• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物越多会让我们病得越重吗?重温伊万·伊里奇的观点。

Does more medicine make us sicker? Ivan Illich revisited.

作者信息

Russell Cormac

机构信息

Asset-Based Community Development Institute at DePaul University, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Gac Sanit. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):579-583. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.11.006. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.11.006
PMID:30718081
Abstract

A proper understanding of health is a social and political challenge, the modern social medicine approach to public health and health approaches more generally tend to minimise this, making the isolated individual the primary unit of health. Ivan Illich, social critic and philosopher, was at the forefront of arguing for a collective health approach and challenging medical hegemony. His theories of institutional counter-productivity, proportionality and his critique of the medical model which he argued was entrenched within an economics of scarcity are as relevant today as they were at their height of popularity, in the 1970s. Applying his analysis to current trends in health approaches I conclude, as did he, that beyond a certain institutional scale or intensity more medicine is making us sicker. Therefore public health requires a dramatic shift away from a focus on individual deficits, lifestyle diseases, behaviour change and health promotion approaches towards genuine community building and significant political investment in the health creation of local communities. Moreover, there is need for more resolute regulation of the marketplace to prevent the health-harming behaviours of industrial and other institutional interests, including public sector and third sector organisations engaged in institutional overreach.

摘要

对健康的正确理解是一项社会和政治挑战,现代社会医学对公共卫生及更广泛的健康方法往往将此最小化,使孤立的个体成为健康的主要单位。社会批评家和哲学家伊万·伊里奇站在倡导集体健康方法和挑战医学霸权的前沿。他的制度反生产力、相称性理论,以及他对医学模式的批判(他认为这种模式深深植根于稀缺经济学之中),在今天与它们在20世纪70年代最受欢迎时一样具有现实意义。将他的分析应用于当前健康方法的趋势,我得出的结论与他一样,即超过一定的制度规模或强度,更多的医疗反而让我们病得更重。因此,公共卫生需要从关注个体缺陷、生活方式疾病、行为改变和健康促进方法,大幅转向真正的社区建设以及对当地社区健康创造进行重大政治投资。此外,需要对市场进行更坚决的监管,以防止工业和其他机构利益(包括从事机构越界行为的公共部门和第三部门组织)的有害健康行为。

相似文献

1
Does more medicine make us sicker? Ivan Illich revisited.药物越多会让我们病得越重吗?重温伊万·伊里奇的观点。
Gac Sanit. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6):579-583. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.11.006. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
2
Ivan Illich and the Nemesis of Medicine. The man and his message in memoriam.伊万·伊里奇与医学的报应。纪念此人及其理念。
Med Health Care Philos. 2003;6(3):273-86. doi: 10.1023/a:1025991708888.
3
Convivial Populations: Ivan Illich and Public Health in the 21st Century.《友善的人群:21 世纪的伊凡·伊里奇与公共卫生》。
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jul;114(7):723-728. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307675. Epub 2024 May 9.
4
The industrialization of fetishism or the fetishism of industrialization: a critique of Ivan Illich.拜物教的工业化或工业化的拜物教:对伊万·伊里奇的批判
Int J Health Serv. 1975;5(3):351-71. doi: 10.2190/QKBJ-TB26-WJDW-P3E4.
5
Introduction: medicine's shadowside: revisiting clinical iatrogenesis.引言:医学的阴暗面:重新审视临床医源性疾病。
Anthropol Med. 2021 Jun;28(2):141-155. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2021.1937514.
6
[Ivan Illich, critic of health care, forgotten by his followers].[伊万·伊里奇,医疗保健批评家,被其追随者遗忘]
Lakartidningen. 2011;108(39):1917-8.
7
John Bradshaw (1918-1989): putting doctors on trial.约翰·布拉德肖(1918 - 1989):审判医生
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Sep;184(3):559-63. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1206-0. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
[Ivan Illich's revenge and death: on iatrogenesis and related phenomena].[伊万·伊里奇的报复与死亡:论医源性疾病及相关现象]
Harefuah. 2004 Apr;143(4):300-2, 316.
9
[Evaluating quality and effectiveness in the promotion of health: approaches and methods of public health and social sciences].[评估促进健康中的质量与效果:公共卫生与社会科学的方法与途径]
Promot Educ. 1997 Jun;4(2):10-5. doi: 10.1177/102538239700400205.
10
Ivan Illich's Medical Nemesis and the 'age of the show': On the Expropriation of Death.伊万·伊里奇的《医学的灾祸》与“作秀时代”:论死亡的剥夺
Nurs Philos. 2018 Jan;19(1). doi: 10.1111/nup.12187.

引用本文的文献

1
Becoming a valued member of society: the meaning of Art-Based vocational rehabilitation in the Norwegian labour and welfare service.成为社会的重要一员:挪威劳动与福利服务中基于艺术的职业康复的意义。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 18;13(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02597-0.
2
The mattering citizen: young adults with mental illness and complex needs' experiences and perceived opportunities of social inclusion.重要公民:患有精神疾病且有复杂需求的年轻人的社会融入经历及感知到的机会
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 29;16:1504767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1504767. eCollection 2025.
3
A framework for extending co-creative communication models to sustainability research.
将共同创造式沟通模型扩展至可持续性研究的框架。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Aug 5;7:1236310. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1236310. eCollection 2024.
4
Treating risk, risking treatment: experiences of iatrogenesis in the HIV/AIDS and opioid epidemics.应对风险,冒险治疗:艾滋病病毒/艾滋病和阿片类药物流行中的医源性经历。
Anthropol Med. 2021 Jun;28(2):239-254. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2021.1926916. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
5
Relational welfare: a socially just response to co-creating health and wellbeing for all.关系福利:共同创造全民健康与幸福的社会公正回应。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Aug;49(6):639-652. doi: 10.1177/1403494820970815. Epub 2020 Dec 15.