Takeda Tomoya, Nakataki Masahito, Ohta Masashi, Hamatani Sayo, Matsuura Kanae, Yoshida Reona, Kameoka Naomi, Tominaga Takeo, Umehara Hidehiro, Kinoshita Makoto, Watanabe Shinya, Numata Shusuke, Sumitani Satsuki, Ohmori Tetsuro
Graduate School of Medical Science, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan.
Department of Psychiatry, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan,
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Jan 21;15:293-301. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S190381. eCollection 2019.
Recently, cognitive variables such as negative and positive self-belief and thoughts have attracted much attention because they are associated with functional outcomes and quality of life (QOL). However, it is unclear how cognitive variables affect subjective and objective QOL. This study aimed to investigate the relationship of negative and positive self-belief and thoughts with subjective and objective QOL.
Thirty-six people with schizophrenia participated in this study. Subjective and objective QOL were assessed with the Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale (SQLS) and Quality of Life Scale (QLS), respectively. Neurocognitive function was assessed with the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Clinical symptoms were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia. Side effects were assessed with the Drug-induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS). Negative and positive self-belief and thoughts were assessed with the Defeatist Performance Belief Scale and Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire-Revised. A generalized linear model was tested, with subjective and objective QOL as the response variable and symptoms, neurocognitive function, and cognitive variables that were significantly correlated with subjective and objective QOL as explanatory variables.
In the schizophrenia group, the common objects score on the QLS was predicted by the composite BACS score, and the total QLS score was predicted by the DIEPSS score. Motivation and Energy, Psychosocial, and Symptoms and Side effects scores on the SQLS were predicted by depression and by negative automatic thought (NAT) and positive automatic thought (PAT).
Our results indicated that key targets for improving objective and subjective QOL in people with schizophrenia are side effects, neurocognitive function, depression, and NAT and PAT.
最近,诸如消极和积极的自我信念及想法等认知变量备受关注,因为它们与功能结局和生活质量(QOL)相关。然而,尚不清楚认知变量如何影响主观和客观生活质量。本研究旨在探讨消极和积极的自我信念及想法与主观和客观生活质量之间的关系。
36名精神分裂症患者参与了本研究。主观和客观生活质量分别用精神分裂症生活质量量表(SQLS)和生活质量量表(QLS)进行评估。神经认知功能用精神分裂症认知简短评估量表(BACS)进行评估。临床症状用阳性和阴性症状量表及精神分裂症卡尔加里抑郁量表进行评估。副作用用药物诱发的锥体外系症状量表(DIEPSS)进行评估。消极和积极的自我信念及想法用失败主义表现信念量表和自动思维问卷修订版进行评估。检验了一个广义线性模型,将主观和客观生活质量作为反应变量,将与主观和客观生活质量显著相关的症状、神经认知功能和认知变量作为解释变量。
在精神分裂症组中,QLS的共同目标得分由BACS综合得分预测,QLS总分由DIEPSS得分预测。SQLS上的动机与活力、心理社会以及症状与副作用得分由抑郁以及消极自动思维(NAT)和积极自动思维(PAT)预测。
我们的结果表明,改善精神分裂症患者客观和主观生活质量的关键目标是副作用、神经认知功能、抑郁以及NAT和PAT。