Domos Peter, Ascione Francesco, Wallace Andrew L
Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Department of Orthopedics, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli, Naples, Italy.
Shoulder Elbow. 2019 Feb;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1177/1758573217728414. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
The present study aimed to determine whether arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair is an effective treatment for improving outcomes for collision athletes with Bankart and non-engaging Hill-Sachs lesions.
Twenty collision athletes underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with posterior capsulotenodesis (B&R group) and were evaluated retrospectively, using pre- and postoperative WOSI (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability), EQ-5D (EuroQOL five dimensions), EQ-VAS (EuroQol-visual analogue scale) scores and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). The recurrence and re-operation rates were compared to a matched group with isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (B group).
The mean age was 25 years with an mean follow-up of 26 months. All mean scores improved with SSV of 90%. There was a mean deficit in external rotation at the side of 10°. One patient was treated with hydrodilatation for frozen shoulder. One patient had residual posterior discomfort but no apprehension in the B&R group compared to 5% persistent apprehension in the B group. In comparison, the recurrence and re-operation rates were 5% and 30% ( = 0.015), 5% and 35% ( = 0.005) in the B&R and B groups, respectively.
This combined technique demonstrated good outcomes, with lower recurrence rates in high-risk collision athletes. The slight restriction in external rotation does not significantly affect any clinical outcomes and return to play.
本研究旨在确定关节镜下Bankart修复填充术是否是改善患有Bankart损伤和非嵌顿性Hill-Sachs损伤的碰撞项目运动员治疗效果的有效方法。
对20名接受关节镜下Bankart修复联合后关节囊固定术的碰撞项目运动员(B&R组)进行回顾性评估,采用术前和术后的西部安大略肩不稳定指数(WOSI)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)、欧洲生活质量视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)评分以及主观肩关节价值(SSV)。将复发率和再次手术率与单纯关节镜下Bankart修复的匹配组(B组)进行比较。
平均年龄为25岁,平均随访26个月。所有平均评分均有所改善,主观肩关节价值为90%。患侧外旋平均减少10°。1例患者因肩周炎接受了液压扩张治疗。B&R组有1例患者存在残留的后部不适但无恐惧,而B组有5%的患者持续存在恐惧。相比之下,B&R组和B组的复发率分别为5%和30%(P = 0.015),再次手术率分别为5%和35%(P = 0.005)。
这种联合技术显示出良好的治疗效果,在高风险碰撞项目运动员中复发率较低。外旋的轻微受限并未显著影响任何临床结果和重返比赛。