Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania.
Epilepsia. 2019 Mar;60(3):518-526. doi: 10.1111/epi.14659. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
There remains a paucity of knowledge regarding specific epilepsy-related risk factors for accidents and injuries in people with epilepsy. Injury studies in people with epilepsy are overrepresented, with tertiary based populations that are prone to bias from severe disease. This study aims to assess the contribution of epilepsy-related risk factors to injuries in a community-based cohort.
We performed a retrospective nested case-control study on patients recruited into the Tasmanian Epilepsy Register (TER) from July 1, 2001 to June 30, 2002. The TER is a community-based cohort of patients with epilepsy in Tasmania, Australia, recruited from the national prescription database and interviewed for epilepsy diagnosis, injuries, and risk factors using validated questionnaires with diagnosis made by an epilepsy specialist. The primary outcome measures were lifetime and recent 12-month injury. Multivariate logistic regression with multiple imputation modeling responder nondisclosure was performed, adjusting for age, gender, region, socioeconomic status, seizure frequency, and epilepsy duration.
A total of 819 patients with epilepsy were included in this study. Ten percent of patients experienced an injury in the preceding year. Before adjusting for seizure frequency, any seizure over the past 12 months was associated with recent injury (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 7.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.17-14.96). Impaired awareness, cluster seizures, sleep-only seizures, and convulsive seizure were characteristics found to significantly influence injuries irrespective of seizure frequency. Although a warning appeared initially protective for recent injuries (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.22-0.69), this was entirely explained by seizure frequency, with the effect becoming nonsignificant.
Likely due to their unpredictable nature, seizures expose patients with epilepsy to a high risk of life-threatening injury. These findings emphasize the importance of seizure freedom for maximizing the safety of patients with epilepsy.
目前,人们对癫痫患者发生事故和受伤的特定癫痫相关危险因素知之甚少。癫痫患者的损伤研究较多,但基于三级医院的人群容易受到严重疾病的偏倚影响。本研究旨在评估癫痫相关危险因素对社区人群中癫痫患者损伤的影响。
我们对 2001 年 7 月 1 日至 2002 年 6 月 30 日期间纳入塔斯马尼亚癫痫登记处(TER)的患者进行了回顾性巢式病例对照研究。TER 是澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州的一个基于社区的癫痫患者队列,从国家处方数据库中招募,通过经过验证的问卷对癫痫诊断、损伤和危险因素进行访谈,由癫痫专家进行诊断。主要结局指标为终生和最近 12 个月的损伤。采用多元逻辑回归模型,对响应者不披露情况进行了多次插补建模,调整了年龄、性别、地区、社会经济状况、发作频率和癫痫持续时间。
本研究共纳入 819 例癫痫患者。10%的患者在过去 1 年中发生过损伤。在未调整发作频率之前,过去 12 个月中的任何发作都与近期损伤相关(调整后的优势比[OR] = 7.90,95%置信区间[CI] = 4.17-14.96)。意识障碍、簇发性发作、睡眠中发作和全面性强直-阵挛性发作是无论发作频率如何都会显著影响损伤的特征。尽管最初出现的警示信号对近期损伤具有保护作用(OR = 0.39,95%CI = 0.22-0.69),但这完全归因于发作频率,其影响变得无统计学意义。
由于癫痫发作的不可预测性,癫痫患者可能会面临危及生命的伤害的高风险。这些发现强调了癫痫无发作对最大限度地提高癫痫患者安全性的重要性。