Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Histopathology. 2019 Jun;74(7):1081-1087. doi: 10.1111/his.13833. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
Comedonecrosis in prostate cancer has always been Gleason pattern 5. However, we aimed to evaluate how intraductal carcinoma (not graded) with comedonecrosis should be considered.
From 52 radical prostatectomy patients, 40 were informative and evaluated with immunohistochemistry for basal cells. Clinical outcome was assessed for biochemical recurrence, metastatic disease and the need for adjuvant therapy. Comedonecrosis was predominantly located in intraductal carcinoma (24, 60%). However, nine (23%) had comedonecrosis within invasive cancer and seven (18%) within both invasive and intraductal carcinoma. Extraprostatic extension rarely showed comedonecrosis (5, 13%), but rather perineural invasion within cribriform glands. Tumours were largely high-stage (15, 38% pT3a and 19, 48% pT3b), with 15 (37%) having positive lymph nodes and four distant metastases. Most cases (25, 63%) had other patterns of Gleason pattern 5 (single cells, solid), although 10 were reclassified as containing no invasive pattern 5. Of these, most were pT3 (eight of 10), but none had positive lymph nodes. Lymph node metastases were more common in patients with invasive cancer containing comedonecrosis (P = 0.02), and the need for androgen deprivation was near significance (P = 0.07), but biochemical recurrence was not significantly different (P = 0.58).
Prostate cancer with comedonecrosis is often intraductal; however, these tumours are largely high-stage, showing a higher rate of positive lymph nodes with invasive comedonecrosis. Immunohistochemistry may be considered when comedonecrosis may significantly change the tumour grade. However, it is not clear at present that excluding intraductal carcinoma from the grade is superior to including it in grading when it is associated with high-grade invasive cancer.
前列腺癌中的粉刺性坏死一直是 Gleason 模式 5。然而,我们旨在评估具有粉刺性坏死的导管内癌(未分级)应如何考虑。
从 52 例根治性前列腺切除术患者中,有 40 例具有信息并通过免疫组织化学对基底细胞进行评估。临床结局评估包括生化复发、转移性疾病和辅助治疗的需求。粉刺性坏死主要位于导管内癌(24,60%)中。然而,有 9 例(23%)在浸润性癌内有粉刺性坏死,7 例(18%)在浸润性癌和导管内癌内均有粉刺性坏死。前列腺外延伸很少有粉刺性坏死(5,13%),但在筛状腺体中常有神经周围侵犯。肿瘤大多为高分期(15,38%pT3a 和 19,48%pT3b),有 15 例(37%)有阳性淋巴结和 4 例远处转移。大多数病例(25,63%)有其他 Gleason 模式 5 模式(单个细胞,实体),尽管有 10 例重新分类为无浸润性模式 5。其中,大多数为 pT3(10 例中的 8 例),但均无阳性淋巴结。在浸润性癌中含有粉刺性坏死的患者中,淋巴结转移更为常见(P=0.02),雄激素剥夺的需求接近显著性(P=0.07),但生化复发无显著差异(P=0.58)。
伴有粉刺性坏死的前列腺癌通常为导管内;然而,这些肿瘤大多为高分期,显示出更高的阳性淋巴结率,且伴有浸润性粉刺性坏死。当粉刺性坏死可能显著改变肿瘤分级时,可以考虑免疫组织化学。然而,目前尚不清楚将导管内癌排除在分级之外是否优于将其包含在与高级别浸润性癌相关的分级中。