Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Immunology Therapeutic Area, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
J Crohns Colitis. 2019 Aug 14;13(8):1025-1035. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz022.
Histologic evaluation is a meaningful complement to endoscopic and clinical measures in ulcerative colitis [UC]. There is a need for a definition of histologic improvement that can be used in clinical trials, and any such definition must be predictive of disease outcomes.
Biopsies were collected from clinical trials (PURSUIT-SC [n = 98], JAK-UC [n = 219], and PROgECT [n = 103]) in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. A pathologist assessed biopsies in a blinded fashion using the Geboes score. A dichotomous histologic improvement end point was defined by selecting Geboes score elements according to their association strength with endoscopic healing. Fisher's exact test and Cramer's V assessed the association of histology with other measures.
Using PURSUIT-SC biopsies, histologic improvement was defined as absence of erosion or ulceration, absence of crypt destruction, and <5% of crypts with epithelial neutrophil infiltration. Histologic improvement was associated with endoscopic healing, as >90% of those with endoscopic healing in JAK-UC [Week 8] and PROgECT [Week 30] achieved histologic improvement. In JAK-UC, patients with histologic improvement had lower disease activity than patients without histologic improvement' [Mayo score = 3.8 vs 7.5] at Week 8. Week 4 histologic improvement was a strong indicator of histologic improvement, endoscopic healing, and clinical response or remission at Week 8 [all p < 0.005]. In PROgECT, 73% of patients with histologic improvement at Week 6 achieved histologic improvement at Week 30 [p = 0.0013].
Histologic improvement based on a simplified, dichotomous Geboes score is associated with favourable endoscopic and clinical outcomes across multiple clinical studies and two therapeutic mechanisms of action.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00487539 [PURSUIT-SC]; NCT01959282 [JAK-UC]; NCT01988961 [PROgECT].
组织学评估是溃疡性结肠炎[UC]内镜和临床评估的有意义补充。需要定义一种可用于临床试验的组织学改善,且任何此类定义都必须能够预测疾病结局。
从中度至重度 UC 患者的临床试验(PURSUIT-SC [n = 98]、JAK-UC [n = 219]和 PROgECT [n = 103])中收集活检。病理学家以盲法使用 Geboes 评分评估活检。根据与内镜愈合的关联强度选择 Geboes 评分元素,定义二分法组织学改善终点。Fisher 确切检验和 Cramer's V 评估组织学与其他指标的关联。
使用 PURSUIT-SC 活检,组织学改善定义为无侵蚀或溃疡、无隐窝破坏和上皮中性粒细胞浸润的隐窝<5%。组织学改善与内镜愈合相关,因为在 JAK-UC[第 8 周]和 PROgECT[第 30 周]中,超过 90%内镜愈合的患者达到组织学改善。在 JAK-UC 中,与无组织学改善的患者相比,组织学改善的患者疾病活动度较低[Mayo 评分 = 3.8 对 7.5],第 8 周。第 4 周组织学改善是第 8 周组织学改善、内镜愈合以及临床反应或缓解的强有力指标[所有 p < 0.005]。在 PROgECT 中,第 6 周组织学改善的 73%患者在第 30 周也实现了组织学改善[p = 0.0013]。
基于简化的二分法 Geboes 评分的组织学改善与多个临床试验以及两种治疗作用机制的有利内镜和临床结局相关。临床试验注册编号:NCT00487539[PURSUIT-SC];NCT01959282[JAK-UC];NCT01988961[PROgECT]。