Suppr超能文献

基于PCR检测植物病原体的组织破坏方法比较

Comparison of Tissue-Disruption Methods for PCR-Based Detection of Plant Pathogens.

作者信息

Vincelli Paul, Amsden Bernadette

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0312.

出版信息

Plant Dis. 2013 Mar;97(3):363-368. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-12-0536-RE.

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of plant-associated microbes depends on physical disruption of tissues of the host and microorganism in order to liberate nucleic acids during extraction. Using six types of plant tissues as well as an oospore preparation of Phytophthora capsici, we evaluated the use of pressure-cycling technology (PCT) compared with several common techniques for physical tissue disruption. With all tissues tested, bead-beating provided excellent yields of amplifiable nucleic acid, with a few inconsistent exceptions. The use of PCT did not consistently improve nucleic acid yields or "amplifiability". The use of a mortar and pestle to physically disrupt plant tissue also provided good results at low cost, though it was not consistently as effective as the bead-beater. Furthermore, handling of ground tissues in an open mortar may present more challenges in minimizing cross-contamination than working with tissues pulverized in a bead-beater tube.

摘要

基于聚合酶链反应的植物相关微生物检测依赖于对宿主和微生物组织进行物理破坏,以便在提取过程中释放核酸。我们使用六种类型的植物组织以及辣椒疫霉的卵孢子制剂,评估了压力循环技术(PCT)与几种常见物理组织破坏技术相比的使用情况。在所有测试的组织中,除了少数不一致的例外情况,珠磨法能提供优异的可扩增核酸产量。使用PCT并不能持续提高核酸产量或“可扩增性”。使用研钵和杵对植物组织进行物理破坏也能以低成本获得良好结果,尽管其效果并不总是与珠磨机一样好。此外,在开放的研钵中处理研磨后的组织,在将交叉污染降至最低方面可能比处理在珠磨机管中粉碎的组织面临更多挑战。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验