Clark Toshimasa James, McKinney Kristin, Jensen Alexandria, Patel Nayana U
University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.
Ultrasound Q. 2019 Sep;35(3):224-227. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000420.
We studied diagnostic performance of an algorithm guiding thyroid nodule management using a malignancy risk model as compared with extant management guidelines. Single-institution, retrospective study was performed with sequential cases from pathology registry from 2012 to 2015. Seventy-eight patients were enrolled, with benign and malignant groups defined by aspiration results. Risk Threshold Algorithm determined management based off of a logistic regression model and a risk threshold. American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS), Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU), and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines were used in comparison. Sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) values were derived, with significance assessed via McNemar and permutation tests. Forty-four benign nodules and 40 papillary thyroid carcinomas were included. Risk Threshold Algorithm area under the ROC curve was 0.80 versus 0.59 (ACR TI-RADS), 0.49 (SRU), and 0.44 (ATA); all areas under the ROC curve differences were statistically significant. Risk Threshold Algorithm demonstrates sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of 63%, 91%, 86%, and 73% at the risk threshold maximizing diagnostic performance, compared with 85%, 39%, 56%, and 74% (ACR TI-RADS); 85%, 18%, 50%, and 57% (SRU); and 89%, 11%, 50%, and 83% (ATA). Sensitivity and specificity were significantly different between all groups except SRU versus TI-RADS. The Risk Threshold Algorithm, based on a malignancy risk model, demonstrates increased overall diagnostic accuracy as compared with ACR TI-RADS, SRU, and ATA management guidelines. Through eliminating unnecessary biopsy, patient anxiety, and morbidity can be reduced.
我们研究了一种使用恶性风险模型指导甲状腺结节管理的算法与现有管理指南相比的诊断性能。采用单机构回顾性研究,纳入了2012年至2015年病理登记中的连续病例。共纳入78例患者,根据穿刺结果分为良性和恶性组。风险阈值算法基于逻辑回归模型和风险阈值确定管理方案。将其与美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(ACR TI-RADS)、超声放射学会(SRU)和美国甲状腺协会(ATA)的指南进行比较。得出敏感性、特异性、阳性/阴性预测值、受试者操作特征(ROC)值,并通过McNemar检验和置换检验评估其显著性。纳入了44个良性结节和40个甲状腺乳头状癌。风险阈值算法的ROC曲线下面积为0.80,而ACR TI-RADS为0.59、SRU为0.49、ATA为0.44;所有ROC曲线下面积差异均具有统计学意义。在使诊断性能最大化的风险阈值下,风险阈值算法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为63%、91%、86%和73%,而ACR TI-RADS分别为85%、39%、56%和74%;SRU分别为85%、18%、50%和57%;ATA分别为89%、11%、50%和83%。除SRU与TI-RADS外,所有组之间的敏感性和特异性均有显著差异。基于恶性风险模型的风险阈值算法与ACR TI-RADS、SRU和ATA管理指南相比,总体诊断准确性更高。通过消除不必要的活检,可以降低患者的焦虑和发病率。