Behrens Claudia, Morales Verónica, Parra Paula, Hurtado Amelia, Fernández Rosario, Giaconi Elisa, Santelices Lucía, Armijo Soledad, Furman Gail
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica del Norte, Chile.
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Chile.
Rev Med Chil. 2018 Dec;146(10):1197-1204. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872018001001197.
Outcomes-based education is a trend in medical education and its assessment is one of the main challenges. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is one of the tools used to assess clinical competencies. Although Chilean medical schools have used OSCEs for 18 years, there is a vast variability in the way these examinations are administered.
To design and implement an integrated OSCE to assess clinical competencies at the end of the medical program in Chilean medical schools, aiming to reduce variability between these schools.
Seven medical schools, supported by experts from the National Board of Medical Examiners, designed a 12 station OSCE to measure clinical outcomes at the end of the seventh year of medical training. Unlike traditional OSCEs, this new examination incorporated the assessment of clinical reasoning and communication skills, evaluated from patients' perspective.
One hundred twenty-five volunteers took the same exam at five different venues. The internal consistency was 0.62. Following a compensatory approach, 85% of students passed the exam. Communication assessment showed poorer results than those reported in the literature.
Among Chilean medical students, the assessment of clinical outcomes in a collaborative way, through a valid and reliable exam, is feasible. A consensus on how to teach and assess clinical reasoning across the medical curriculum is required. The assessment of students' communication skills requires further development.
基于结果的教育是医学教育的一种趋势,其评估是主要挑战之一。客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是用于评估临床能力的工具之一。尽管智利医学院校使用OSCE已有18年,但这些考试的实施方式存在很大差异。
设计并实施一项综合OSCE,以评估智利医学院校医学课程结束时的临床能力,旨在减少这些院校之间的差异。
在国家医学考试委员会专家的支持下,七所医学院校设计了一个包含12个站点的OSCE,以测量医学培训第七年结束时的临床结果。与传统OSCE不同,这项新考试纳入了从患者角度评估临床推理和沟通技巧的内容。
125名志愿者在五个不同地点参加了同一项考试。内部一致性为0.62。采用补偿方法后,85%的学生通过了考试。沟通评估结果比文献报道的要差。
在智利医学生中,通过有效且可靠的考试以协作方式评估临床结果是可行的。需要就如何在整个医学课程中教授和评估临床推理达成共识。学生沟通技巧的评估需要进一步改进。