Bora Vaibhav, Brown Kristen N., Lim Michael J.
Augusta University- Medical College of Georgia
Augusta University
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most common valvular abnormalities, second only to aortic valve stenosis. Treatment depends on the duration and severity of this condition. Acute severe MR, often caused by papillary muscle rupture or leaflet perforation from infective endocarditis, leads to significant hemodynamic instability, acute volume overload, and congestion—necessitating immediate surgical intervention. Chronic MR can be categorized into 2 types: primary and secondary. Primary MR is caused by a primary abnormality of 1 or more components of the valve apparatus (leaflets, chordae tendineae, papillary muscles, annulus).In contrast, secondary MR is caused by alterations in left ventricular or left atrial function and shape. If mild and asymptomatic, chronic MR can be medically managed and monitored over time. However, patients with symptomatic chronic MR should undergo evaluation for potential surgical intervention. In cases of patients who are asymptomatic with chronic MR, surgical consideration may be warranted if they exhibit signs of depressed left ventricular function and dilatation, atrial fibrillation, or pulmonary hypertension. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the initial imaging modality for screening and evaluating mitral valve morphology and pathology and determining the mechanism of MR. TTE also helps quantify the severity of MR and assess left ventricular function and size, and left atrial size. Various parameters are used for qualitative and quantitative MR assessment, including a 2-dimensional analysis of mitral valve leaflet characteristics, motion, coaptation, MR jet to left atrial area ratio, vena contracta, effective regurgitant orifice area, regurgitant volume, regurgitant area, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular end-diastolic area. In cases where TTE images do not provide adequate information, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can offer a more detailed assessment. Three-dimensional TEE can provide an "enface" view of the MV, resembling a surgical inspection, which can greatly aid discussions and preprocedure planning (see Mitral Valve, En Face View). In situations where TEE is contraindicated, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is an alternative option, providing highly accurate data for MR assessment and evaluation of left ventricle dimensions. Results from recent studies have shown percutaneous mitral valve repair as a viable alternative for high-surgical-risk patients suffering from severe symptomatic MR. This procedure has demonstrated low morbidity and mortality rates among many patients. The Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study Trial (EVEREST) 1 laid the groundwork, demonstrating the safety and feasibility of the edge-to-edge repair technique. The subsequent EVEREST 2 randomized control trial compared percutaneous edge-to-edge repair with surgical mitral valve repair/replacement; this suggested the surgical approach's superiority in reducing MR but also supported the long-term safety of the edge-to-edge repair device and its durability in reducing MR. The edge-to-edge leaflet repair device is a minimally invasive, catheter-based therapy based on the principle of the "Alfieri stitch," a surgical technique pioneered by Dr. Ottavio Alfieri, an Italian cardiothoracic surgeon. This technique involves bringing together the 2 flailing leaflets of the MV, resulting in reduced or eliminated regurgitation. Typically, this repair creates a double orifice based on the surgical edge-to-edge Alfieri repair. Many percutaneous options exist for patients with MR and multiple comorbidities, placing them at higher risk for surgical interventions. These percutaneous techniques can be classified based on the specific site of the mitral apparatus they target, such as the leaflets (edge-to-edge repair), annulus (indirect or direct annuloplasty), chordae (neo-chords, percutaneous chord implantation), or left ventricle (percutaneous left ventricle remodeling). This article discusses primary and secondary MR and noninvasive catheter management options, including their indications, contraindications, procedural techniques, and complications. The primary focus of the discussion will be on the United States Food and Drug Administration's approved edge-to-edge repair devices.
二尖瓣反流(MR)是最常见的瓣膜异常之一,仅次于主动脉瓣狭窄。治疗取决于该病症的持续时间和严重程度。急性重度MR通常由乳头肌破裂或感染性心内膜炎导致的瓣叶穿孔引起,会导致严重的血流动力学不稳定、急性容量超负荷和充血,因此需要立即进行手术干预。慢性MR可分为两种类型:原发性和继发性。原发性MR是由瓣膜装置的一个或多个组件(瓣叶、腱索、乳头肌、瓣环)的原发性异常引起的。相比之下,继发性MR是由左心室或左心房功能及形态的改变引起的。如果是轻度且无症状的慢性MR,可以进行药物治疗并长期监测。然而,有症状的慢性MR患者应接受评估,以确定是否需要进行潜在的手术干预。对于无症状的慢性MR患者,如果出现左心室功能减退和扩张、房颤或肺动脉高压的迹象,也可能需要考虑手术治疗。经胸超声心动图(TTE)是筛查和评估二尖瓣形态及病理状况并确定MR机制的初始影像学检查方法。TTE还有助于量化MR的严重程度,评估左心室功能和大小以及左心房大小。用于定性和定量评估MR的参数有多种,包括二尖瓣瓣叶特征、运动、对合情况的二维分析,MR射流与左心房面积之比、反流束颈宽、有效反流口面积、反流容积、反流面积、左心室射血分数以及左心室舒张末期面积。如果TTE图像提供的信息不足,经食管超声心动图(TEE)可以提供更详细的评估。三维TEE可以提供二尖瓣的“正面”视图,类似于手术检查,这对讨论和术前规划有很大帮助(见二尖瓣正面视图)。在TEE禁忌的情况下,心脏磁共振成像也是一种选择,可为MR评估和左心室尺寸评估提供高度准确的数据。最近的研究结果表明,经皮二尖瓣修复术对于患有严重症状性MR的高手术风险患者是一种可行的替代方案。该手术在许多患者中已显示出较低的发病率和死亡率。血管内瓣膜缘对缘修复研究试验(EVEREST)1奠定了基础,证明了缘对缘修复技术的安全性和可行性。随后的EVEREST 2随机对照试验将经皮缘对缘修复与外科二尖瓣修复/置换进行了比较;结果表明手术方法在减少MR方面具有优势,但也支持了缘对缘修复装置的长期安全性及其在减少MR方面的耐久性。缘对缘瓣叶修复装置是一种基于“阿尔菲里缝合”原理的微创导管治疗方法,“阿尔菲里缝合”是由意大利心胸外科医生奥塔维奥·阿尔菲里博士开创的一种手术技术。该技术涉及将二尖瓣的两个脱垂瓣叶拉拢在一起,从而减少或消除反流。通常,这种修复会基于手术缘对缘阿尔菲里修复形成双孔。对于患有MR和多种合并症、手术干预风险较高的患者,有多种经皮治疗选择。这些经皮技术可根据其针对的二尖瓣装置的特定部位进行分类,例如瓣叶(缘对缘修复)、瓣环(间接或直接瓣环成形术)、腱索(新腱索、经皮腱索植入)或左心室(经皮左心室重塑)。本文讨论原发性和继发性MR以及非侵入性导管治疗选择,包括其适应证、禁忌证、操作技术和并发症。讨论的主要重点将是美国食品药品监督管理局批准的缘对缘修复装置。