Kaur Kirandeep, Shah Amar, Patel Bhupendra C.
Gomabai Netralaya and Research Centre
University of Utah
The superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) approach for embolization of carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) was first described over 25 years ago. CCFs are typically classified into 4 subtypes based on the etiology and nature of the lesion. Direct (Barrow type A) lesions involve an endothelial tear in the carotid artery itself, while indirect lesions (Barrow types B, C, or D) affect small branches of the internal or external carotid systems. Although 10% to 60% of CCFs may resolve spontaneously, and up to 30% of low-flow CCFs may improve with conservative management (carotid compression therapy), many progressive lesions require intervention. Direct lesions are treatable with endoarterial procedures, whereas indirect lesions are best managed with transvenous embolization, with the ipsilateral inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) being the preferred access route. Initial reports characterized case series where the SOV route was used when traditional access through the IPS was unsuccessful. The SOV is typically accessed through the facial-angular venous system; however, vessel stenosis, hypoplasia, or tortuosity can sometimes prevent safe transvenous access via this route. Surgical cutdown for direct cannulation of the SOV is a safe and effective option when other endovascular approaches have been exhausted. Although advances in endovascular access techniques have reduced the need for this method, direct cannulation of the SOV via surgical cutdown remains a valuable technique in the surgical armamentarium. SOV cannulation for CCF is a critical but challenging procedure in the management of vascular abnormalities affecting the cavernous sinus. CCF is an abnormal communication between the carotid artery and the cavernous sinus, leading to increased venous pressure and subsequent orbital congestion, proptosis, conjunctival chemosis, and vision-threatening complications. Endovascular treatment has revolutionized CCF management, with transvenous embolization being the preferred approach. Although the femoral and jugular routes are standard access points, anatomical variations and venous thrombosis may necessitate alternative routes, among which SOV cannulation is a key option. The SOV is a vital orbital venous drainage pathway that connects the facial venous system to the cavernous sinus. However, its small caliber and anatomical variability make direct cannulation complex, requiring careful imaging guidance to ensure precise navigation and minimize complications. Despite these challenges, SOV access offers an invaluable route for embolization in cases where conventional venous access routes fail or are unavailable. SOV cannulation is particularly indicated when the traditional transfemoral or transjugular approach is unsuccessful due to venous occlusion, thrombosis, or anatomic anomalies. Indirect dural CCFs with preferential drainage through the ophthalmic venous system also warrant SOV access for optimal embolization. Additionally, patients with severe proptosis and orbital venous congestion may require urgent intervention through SOV cannulation to prevent irreversible visual impairment. The procedure relies on detailed anatomical knowledge of the SOV, which originates from the angular vein near the medial canthus and courses posteriorly into the superior orbital fissure. Anatomical variations, tortuosity, and the close proximity to surrounding structures, such as the optic nerve and extraocular muscles, make precise catheterization crucial. The vein is usually accessed percutaneously via a medial canthal approach, with real-time imaging guidance from modalities such as ultrasound and fluoroscopy to confirm its patency and location. The procedure for SOV cannulation begins with meticulous preparation, including the administration of local or general anesthesia and the creation of a sterile field. Ultrasound is used to visualize the vein, ensuring accurate entry and minimizing the risk of complications. A micropuncture needle is introduced through a small medial canthal incision, and a guidewire is carefully threaded into the vein. Once access is secured, a microcatheter is advanced through the SOV into the cavernous sinus, guided by fluoroscopy and angiography. The final step involves embolization using coils, liquid embolic agents such as Onyx, or detachable balloons to occlude the fistulous communication. Postprocedural imaging is performed to confirm successful closure, and careful hemostasis is achieved to prevent venous leakage. Despite its advantages, SOV cannulation presents several technical challenges. Small, tortuous, or thrombosed veins can complicate access, often requiring advanced imaging techniques or alternative surgical exposure. The fragility of the SOV increases the risk of vein rupture and orbital hemorrhage, and improper needle placement may cause inadvertent arterial puncture or optic nerve injury. Incomplete embolization is another concern, as partial occlusion of the fistula can lead to symptom recurrence, necessitating repeat interventions. Infection and thrombophlebitis are additional risks, making postprocedural monitoring essential to ensure patient safety. Advancements in imaging, catheter technology, and minimally invasive techniques are continuously refining the approach to SOV cannulation for CCF treatment. Endoscopic-assisted visualization improves procedural accuracy, while robotic-assisted navigation enhances precision in catheter placement. The development of bioabsorbable embolic agents may reduce long-term complications, and artificial intelligence-assisted imaging analysis can optimize procedural planning, further improving success rates. These innovations are poised to make SOV cannulation safer and more effective, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.
25年多前首次描述了经眼上静脉(SOV)途径栓塞颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)。CCF通常根据病变的病因和性质分为4种亚型。直接型(巴罗A型)病变涉及颈动脉本身的内皮撕裂,而间接型病变(巴罗B、C或D型)影响颈内或颈外动脉系统的小分支。尽管10%至60%的CCF可能会自发缓解,高达30%的低流量CCF通过保守治疗(颈动脉压迫疗法)可能会改善,但许多进行性病变仍需要干预。直接型病变可通过动脉内手术治疗,而间接型病变最好通过经静脉栓塞治疗,同侧岩下窦(IPS)是首选的入路途径。最初的报告描述了一些病例系列,其中当通过IPS的传统入路不成功时使用了SOV途径。SOV通常通过面静脉-角静脉系统进入;然而,血管狭窄、发育不全或迂曲有时会妨碍通过该途径进行安全的经静脉入路。当其他血管内入路方法都用尽时,手术切开直接插管进入SOV是一种安全有效的选择。尽管血管内入路技术的进步减少了对这种方法的需求,但通过手术切开直接插管进入SOV仍然是手术器械库中的一项有价值技术。对于影响海绵窦的血管异常,经SOV插管治疗CCF是一个关键但具有挑战性的手术。CCF是颈动脉与海绵窦之间的异常交通,导致静脉压升高,随后出现眼眶充血、眼球突出、结膜水肿以及威胁视力的并发症。血管内治疗彻底改变了CCF的治疗方式,经静脉栓塞是首选方法。尽管股静脉和颈静脉途径是标准的入路点,但解剖变异和静脉血栓形成可能需要选择其他途径,其中经SOV插管是一个关键选择。SOV是一条重要的眼眶静脉引流途径,它将面静脉系统与海绵窦相连。然而,其管径小且解剖变异大,使得直接插管操作复杂,需要仔细的影像学引导以确保精确导航并将并发症降至最低。尽管存在这些挑战,但在传统静脉入路失败或不可用时,SOV入路为栓塞提供了一条非常有价值的途径。当传统的经股静脉或经颈静脉入路由于静脉闭塞、血栓形成或解剖异常而不成功时,特别适合经SOV插管。通过眼静脉系统优先引流的间接硬脑膜CCF也需要经SOV入路以实现最佳栓塞。此外,患有严重眼球突出和眼眶静脉充血的患者可能需要通过经SOV插管进行紧急干预,以防止不可逆转的视力损害。该手术依赖于对SOV的详细解剖知识,SOV起源于内眦附近的角静脉,向后进入眶上裂。解剖变异、迂曲以及与周围结构(如视神经和眼外肌)的紧密相邻使得精确插管至关重要。通常通过内眦入路经皮进入该静脉,借助超声和荧光透视等方式进行实时影像学引导,以确认其通畅性和位置。经SOV插管的手术首先要进行细致的准备,包括局部或全身麻醉的实施以及无菌手术区域的创建。使用超声可视化静脉,确保准确穿刺并将并发症风险降至最低。通过内眦小切口插入微穿刺针,然后小心地将导丝穿入静脉。一旦建立通路,在荧光透视和血管造影的引导下,将微导管通过SOV推进到海绵窦。最后一步是使用弹簧圈、如Onyx等液体栓塞剂或可脱性球囊进行栓塞,以闭塞瘘口。术后进行影像学检查以确认封堵成功,并进行仔细的止血以防止静脉渗漏。尽管经SOV插管有其优势,但也存在一些技术挑战。静脉细小、迂曲或血栓形成会使穿刺变得复杂,通常需要先进的影像学技术或其他手术暴露方法。SOV的脆弱性增加了静脉破裂和眼眶出血的风险,不当的穿刺针放置可能导致意外动脉穿刺或视神经损伤。另一个问题是栓塞不完全,因为瘘口的部分闭塞可能导致症状复发,需要再次干预。感染和血栓性静脉炎是额外的风险,因此术后监测对于确保患者安全至关重要。影像学、导管技术和微创技术的进步不断完善经SOV插管治疗CCF的方法。内镜辅助可视化提高了手术准确性,而机器人辅助导航增强了导管放置的精确性。可生物吸收栓塞剂的开发可能会减少长期并发症,人工智能辅助的影像学分析可以优化手术规划,进一步提高成功率。这些创新有望使经SOV插管更安全、更有效,最终为患者带来更好的治疗效果。