Suppr超能文献

帕克兰公式

Parkland Formula

作者信息

Mehta Mitali, Tudor Gregory J.

机构信息

MUSC

University of IL College of Med

Abstract

Extensive burns can cause considerable local damage, tissue injury, and a widespread inflammatory response affecting multiple organ systems. All severely burned patients are trauma patients first, thus should always be handled systematically with an initial focus on the ABCs (airway, breathing, and circulation). After the primary and secondary surveys are completed, early and aggressive fluid resuscitation is initiated.  The fundamental critical elements in burn resuscitation have progressively evolved as more information is unveiled through decades of research. Many formulas and their respective modifications have been modeled to reflect the changes in knowledge. In the 1930s, Frank Pell Underhill reported the fluid within a blister sustained from a burn to be of similar composition to plasma, which led to fluid resuscitation parameters based on patient weight and serum protein levels or hematocrit. Cope and Moore established a relationship between burn size and fluid resuscitation in the 1940s. Initially, plasma was favored as the principal constituent in resuscitation, with the Evan formula advocating for 2 mL per patient weight in kilograms per percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) burned, plus 2 L of intravenous maintenance fluids, half of which consisted of plasma and the other half of normal saline solution. The original Brooke formula continued to use 2 mL per weight in kilograms per percentage of TBSA burn but decreased the plasma requirements to one-fourth of the total fluids administered, and the remainder consisted of Lactated Ringer's solution.  Currently, the Parkland formula is the most frequently used burn resuscitation formula, followed by the Brooke formula. The Parkland formula uses 4 mL per patient weight in kilograms per percentage of TBSA burned with Lactated Ringer's solution as the primary crystalloid solution. However, despite the Parkland formula being the gold standard in burn resuscitation, controversy continues to remain as many studies seek to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of the Parkland formula in burn resuscitation.

摘要

大面积烧伤可导致严重的局部损伤、组织损伤以及影响多个器官系统的广泛炎症反应。所有严重烧伤患者首先都是创伤患者,因此应始终系统地进行处理,最初重点关注ABC(气道、呼吸和循环)。在完成初级和次级评估后,应尽早积极进行液体复苏。随着数十年来研究揭示了更多信息,烧伤复苏的基本关键要素也在不断演变。许多公式及其各自的修改版本已被建模以反映知识的变化。20世纪30年代,弗兰克·佩尔·昂德希尔报告说,烧伤水泡内的液体成分与血浆相似,这导致了基于患者体重和血清蛋白水平或血细胞比容的液体复苏参数。20世纪40年代,科普和摩尔建立了烧伤面积与液体复苏之间的关系。最初,血浆被视为复苏的主要成分,埃文公式主张每千克体重的患者每烧伤全身表面积(TBSA)的百分比给予2毫升,再加上2升静脉维持液,其中一半为血浆,另一半为生理盐水溶液。原始的布鲁克公式继续采用每千克体重每烧伤TBSA百分比给予2毫升,但将血浆需求量降至所给予总液体量的四分之一,其余部分为乳酸林格氏液。目前,帕克兰公式是最常用的烧伤复苏公式,其次是布鲁克公式。帕克兰公式使用每千克体重的患者每烧伤TBSA百分比给予4毫升乳酸林格氏液作为主要晶体溶液。然而,尽管帕克兰公式是烧伤复苏的金标准,但随着许多研究试图评估帕克兰公式在烧伤复苏中的准确性和可行性,争议仍然存在。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验