Posham Raghuram, Young Lindsay B, Lookstein Robert A, Pena Constantino, Patel Rahul S, Fischman Aaron M
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Florida.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018 Dec;35(5):427-434. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676341. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
The benefits of transradial arterial access (TRA) versus transfemoral arterial access (TFA) have been extensively described in the literature; however, TFA remains the predominant access site choice in the management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). There are still significant unmet needs for operators wishing to provide the same effective interventions for lower extremity PAD via TRA as with TFA. This article provides an up-to-date review of the literature and devices currently available for operators wishing to treat lower extremity PAD via TRA and the limitations they may face.
经桡动脉入路(TRA)与经股动脉入路(TFA)的优势在文献中已有广泛描述;然而,在周围动脉疾病(PAD)的治疗中,TFA仍然是主要的入路部位选择。对于希望通过TRA为下肢PAD提供与TFA相同有效干预措施的操作者来说,仍存在重大未满足的需求。本文对目前可供希望通过TRA治疗下肢PAD的操作者使用的文献和设备以及他们可能面临的局限性进行了最新综述。