• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青光眼患者中iStent与CyPass在有或无超声乳化情况下的比较:一项荟萃分析。

Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mahdavi Fard Ali, Patel Sangita P, Pourafkari Leili, Nader Nader D

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Department of Ophthalmology, Ross Eye Institute, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA Ophthalmology and Research Service, Veterans Administration Western New York Healthcare, System, Buffalo, NY, USA SUNY Eye Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2019 Jan 31;10:2040622318820850. doi: 10.1177/2040622318820850. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1177/2040622318820850
PMID:30728930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6357298/
Abstract

BACGROUND

The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the overall intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of iStent or CyPass as isolated procedures or in combination with cataract extraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cochrane review manager 5.3 software (RevMan 5.3) was used for a meta-analysis of IOPs and the number of antiglaucoma medications in six groups according to the type and number of stents and whether the procedure was isolated or in combination with cataract extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 33 out of 446 publications retrieved have been enrolled. The mean changes in IOP in the groups with one iStent and more than two iStents with concurrent cataract extraction were -3.78 ± 0.53 mmHg and -3.89 ± 0.73 mmHg, respectively. The mean differences in IOP in the groups with one iStent and more than two iStents without concurrent cataract extraction were -3.96 ± 0.25 mmHg and -7.48 ± 0.55 mmHg, respectively. The mean changes in IOP in the groups with CyPass implantation with and without concurrent cataract extraction were -4.97 ± 1.38 mmHg and -8.96 ± 0.16 mmHg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both iStent and CyPass either in combination with cataract extraction or as isolated procedures effectively decrease IOP. This effect is greatest with isolated implantation of CyPass followed by multiple iStents and then single iStent implantation and lasts up to 2 years.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是进行一项荟萃分析,以比较iStent或CyPass单独使用或与白内障摘除术联合使用时降低眼内压(IOP)的总体效果。

材料与方法

使用Cochrane综述管理器5.3软件(RevMan 5.3)对六组患者的眼内压和抗青光眼药物数量进行荟萃分析,这六组根据支架的类型和数量以及手术是单独进行还是与白内障摘除术联合进行来划分。

主要结果

在检索到的446篇出版物中,共有33篇被纳入。在同时进行白内障摘除术的单枚iStent组和两枚以上iStent组中,眼内压的平均变化分别为-3.78±0.53mmHg和-3.89±0.73mmHg。在未同时进行白内障摘除术的单枚iStent组和两枚以上iStent组中,眼内压的平均差异分别为-3.96±0.25mmHg和-7.48±0.55mmHg。在植入CyPass且同时进行和未同时进行白内障摘除术的组中,眼内压的平均变化分别为-4.97±1.38mmHg和-8.96±0.16mmHg。

结论

iStent和CyPass无论是与白内障摘除术联合使用还是单独使用,均能有效降低眼内压。单独植入CyPass的效果最佳,其次是多枚iStent,然后是单枚iStent植入,且这种效果可持续长达2年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/e52bc32a43c3/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/fa79cf67e3bd/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/b3fafc2b0a06/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/ec649f4642f1/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/ee4b10eaf909/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/ce703a120b36/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/8f84999aea52/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/bef403b93bfc/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/e52bc32a43c3/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/fa79cf67e3bd/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/b3fafc2b0a06/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/ec649f4642f1/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/ee4b10eaf909/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/ce703a120b36/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/8f84999aea52/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/bef403b93bfc/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6f7/6357298/e52bc32a43c3/10.1177_2040622318820850-fig8.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis.青光眼患者中iStent与CyPass在有或无超声乳化情况下的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2019 Jan 31;10:2040622318820850. doi: 10.1177/2040622318820850. eCollection 2019.
2
iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis.青光眼合并白内障患者使用iStent联合超声乳化术与单纯超声乳化术的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0131770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131770. eCollection 2015.
3
iStent as a Solo Procedure for Glaucoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.iStent作为青光眼患者的单一治疗方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128146. eCollection 2015.
4
12-Month Retrospective Comparison of Kahook Dual Blade Excisional Goniotomy with Istent Trabecular Bypass Device Implantation in Glaucomatous Eyes at the Time of Cataract Surgery.白内障手术时青光眼眼中 Kahook 双刀片切除术与 Istent 小梁旁路装置植入的 12 个月回顾性比较。
Adv Ther. 2019 Sep;36(9):2515-2527. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01025-1. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with two iStent inject trabecular microbypass stents with or without endocyclophotocoagulation.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合使用或不联合使用内路环光凝的两种 iStent inject 小梁微旁路引流植入物的效果。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct;104(10):1378-1383. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315434. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Ab interno trabecular bypass surgery with iStent for open-angle glaucoma.用于开角型青光眼的iStent内小梁旁路手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 28;3(3):CD012743. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012743.pub2.
7
Effectiveness of iStent Trabecular Microbypass System Combined with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone in Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract Depending on the Initial Intraocular Pressure.iStent Trabecular Microbypass 系统联合超声乳化白内障吸除术与单纯超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗青光眼合并白内障的疗效比较:基于初始眼压的影响。
Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(2):327-336. doi: 10.1159/000511456. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction.青光眼患者白内障摘除术中房角切开术与小梁旁路装置植入术的多中心回顾性比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr 30;12:791-797. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S158403. eCollection 2018.
9
Clinical Outcomes After Second-Generation Trabecular Microbypass Stents (iStent inject®) with Phacoemulsification in Korean Patients.韩国患者第二代小梁微旁路支架(iStent inject®)联合超声乳化术后的临床结果
Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(4):1105-1117. doi: 10.1007/s40123-021-00412-8. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
10
Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: Comparison of iStent with iStent inject in primary open angle glaucoma.微创青光眼手术:原发性开角型青光眼的 iStent 与 iStent inject 的比较。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep;47(7):898-903. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13526. Epub 2019 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing iStent versus CyPass with or without phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma: a meta-analysis.青光眼患者中比较iStent与CyPass在有或无超声乳化情况下的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 1;10:2040622319865657. doi: 10.1177/2040622319865657. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Manchester iStent study: 3-year results and cost analysis.曼彻斯特iStent研究:3年结果及成本分析。
Eye (Lond). 2016 Oct;30(10):1365-1370. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.139. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
2
The Suprachoroidal Route in Glaucoma Surgery.青光眼手术中的脉络膜上腔途径
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2016 Jan-Apr;10(1):13-20. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1197. Epub 2016 May 12.
3
Where does selective laser trabeculoplasty stand now? A review.选择性激光小梁成形术现状如何?一篇综述。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Apr 5;3:10. doi: 10.1186/s40662-016-0041-y. eCollection 2016.
4
Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: An Update.选择性激光小梁成形术:最新进展
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016 Jan-Feb;5(1):63-9. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000175.
5
Trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation during small-incision cataract surgery for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: Long-term results.小切口白内障手术期间小梁微旁路支架植入治疗开角型青光眼或高眼压症:长期结果
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;41(12):2664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.032.
6
Prospective, randomized study of one, two, or three trabecular bypass stents in open-angle glaucoma subjects on topical hypotensive medication.对使用局部降压药物的开角型青光眼患者植入一、二或三个小梁旁路支架的前瞻性随机研究。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec 11;9:2313-20. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S96695. eCollection 2015.
7
A prospective 3-year follow-up trial of implantation of two trabecular microbypass stents in open-angle glaucoma.一项关于在开角型青光眼中植入两个小梁微旁路支架的前瞻性3年随访试验。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov 3;9:2057-65. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S91732. eCollection 2015.
8
Micro-Bypass Implantation for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Combined with Phacoemulsification: 4-Year Follow-Up.原发性开角型青光眼合并白内障超声乳化术中微旁路植入术:4年随访
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:795357. doi: 10.1155/2015/795357. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
9
iStent with Phacoemulsification versus Phacoemulsification Alone for Patients with Glaucoma and Cataract: A Meta-Analysis.青光眼合并白内障患者使用iStent联合超声乳化术与单纯超声乳化术的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0131770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131770. eCollection 2015.
10
iStent as a Solo Procedure for Glaucoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.iStent作为青光眼患者的单一治疗方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0128146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128146. eCollection 2015.