• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急医疗服务中的用药安全:寻求基于证据的核查方法以减少差错。

Medication safety in emergency medical services: approaching an evidence-based method of verification to reduce errors.

作者信息

Misasi Paul, Keebler Joseph R

机构信息

Wichita State University, 1845 N. Fairmount, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA.

Associate Professor, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, USA.

出版信息

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Jan 21;10:2042098618821916. doi: 10.1177/2042098618821916. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1177/2042098618821916
PMID:30728945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6351968/
Abstract

Lack of verification is often cited as a root cause of medication errors; however, medication errors occur in spite of conventional verification practices and it appears that human factors engineering (HFE) can inform the design of a more effective method. To this end, an HFE-driven process was designed and implemented in an urban, Midwestern emergency medical service agency. Medication error data were collected over a 54-month period, 27 months before and after implementation. A decrease in the average monthly error rate was realized for all medications administered (49.0%) during the post-intervention time period. The average monthly error rate for fentanyl, a commonly administered analgesic, demonstrated a 71.1% error rate decrease. This study is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of a team-based cross-check process for medication verification to prevent errors in the prehospital setting.

摘要

缺乏核查常被视为用药错误的一个根本原因;然而,尽管有传统的核查流程,用药错误仍会发生,而且似乎人因工程学(HFE)可以为设计一种更有效的方法提供依据。为此,在中西部城市的一家紧急医疗服务机构设计并实施了一个由人因工程学驱动的流程。在实施前后各27个月的54个月期间收集用药错误数据。干预后时间段内所有给药药物的平均每月错误率下降了(49.0%)。常用镇痛药芬太尼的平均每月错误率下降了71.1%。本研究首次评估了基于团队的交叉核对流程在院前环境中进行用药核查以预防错误的有效性。

相似文献

1
Medication safety in emergency medical services: approaching an evidence-based method of verification to reduce errors.紧急医疗服务中的用药安全:寻求基于证据的核查方法以减少差错。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2019 Jan 21;10:2042098618821916. doi: 10.1177/2042098618821916. eCollection 2019.
2
Structured inspection of medications carried and stored by emergency medical services agencies identifies practices that may lead to medication errors.对急救医疗服务机构携带和储存的药物进行结构化检查,可以确定可能导致用药错误的操作实践。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):67-75. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.621046. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
3
Medication prescribing errors in the prehospital setting and in the ED.院前和急诊科的用药处方错误。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.023. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
4
Medication dosing errors in pediatric patients treated by emergency medical services.儿科患者在接受急救医疗服务时的用药剂量错误。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Jan-Mar;16(1):59-66. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.614043. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
5
Comparing the accuracy of medication order verification between pharmacists and a tech check tech model: A prospective randomised observational study.比较药师与技术检查技术模型在药物医嘱核对准确性方面的差异:一项前瞻性随机观察研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Oct;14(10):931-935. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
6
Development and Prospective Federal State-Wide Evaluation of a Device for Height-Based Dose Recommendations in Prehospital Pediatric Emergencies: A Simple Tool to Prevent Most Severe Drug Errors.院前儿科急诊中基于身高的剂量推荐设备的开发及联邦全州范围前瞻性评估:预防最严重用药错误的简易工具
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Mar-Apr;22(2):252-259. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1248257. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
7
Color-coded prefilled medication syringes decrease time to delivery and dosing errors in simulated prehospital pediatric resuscitations: A randomized crossover trial.颜色编码预充式给药注射器可减少模拟院前儿科复苏中的给药时间和给药错误:一项随机交叉试验。
Resuscitation. 2015 Nov;96:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.035. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
8
Implementation and evaluation of a collaborative clinical pharmacist's medications reconciliation and charting service for admitted medical inpatients in a metropolitan hospital.为一家大都市医院的住院内科患者实施并评估临床药师协作的用药核对与医嘱录入服务。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Dec;41(6):662-666. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12442. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
9
Assessing controlled substance prescribing errors in a pediatric teaching hospital: an analysis of the safety of analgesic prescription practice in the transition from the hospital to home.评估一家儿科教学医院的管制药品处方错误:对从医院到家庭过渡阶段镇痛处方实践安全性的分析。
J Pain. 2009 Feb;10(2):160-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.08.004. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
10
Time trend of injection drug errors before and after implementation of bar-code verification system.条形码验证系统实施前后注射药物错误的时间趋势。
Technol Health Care. 2015;23(3):267-74. doi: 10.3233/THC-150897.

引用本文的文献

1
Human errors in emergency medical services: a qualitative analysis of contributing factors.急诊医疗服务中的人为失误:促成因素的定性分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 30;32(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01253-7.
2
How safe is prehospital care? A systematic review.院前急救有多安全?一项系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Oct 26;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab138.
3
Effect of a Mobile App on Prehospital Medication Errors During Simulated Pediatric Resuscitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.移动应用程序对模拟儿科复苏期间院前用药错误的影响:一项随机临床试验。

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-checking to reduce adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department: study protocol of the CHARMED cluster randomized study.交叉核对以减少急诊科医疗差错导致的不良事件:CHARMED整群随机研究方案
BMC Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 4;15:21. doi: 10.1186/s12873-015-0046-1.
2
A comparative assessment of adverse event classification in the out-of-hospital setting.院外环境中不良事件分类的比较评估。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):495-504. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.916022. Epub 2014 May 30.
3
Dusting for fingerprints. How to reinforce the foundation of an EMS safety culture.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2123007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23007.
提取指纹。如何强化急救医疗服务安全文化的基础。
EMS World. 2013 Nov;42(11):63-6.
4
The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction.人类因素科学:区分事实与虚构。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):802-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001450. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
5
Factors associated with adverse events resulting from medical errors in the emergency department: two work better than one.急诊科医疗差错导致不良事件的相关因素:两人协作效果更佳。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.061. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
Medication administration errors by nurses: adherence to guidelines.护士给药错误:遵守指南。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Feb;22(3-4):590-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04344.x. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
7
Fatal mistakes in prehospital medicine. The laryngoscope, the syringe and the ink pen can all cause great harm.院前医学中的致命错误。喉镜、注射器和钢笔都可能造成巨大伤害。
EMS World. 2012 Oct;41(10):28, 30, 32 passim.
8
Application of human error theory in case analysis of wrong procedures.人为失误理论在错误程序案例分析中的应用。
J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun;6(2):108-14. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3181de47f9.
9
What is rational about killing a patient with an overdose?: enlightenment, continental philosophy and the role of the human subject in system failure.过量用药杀死病人有何合理之处?:启示、大陆哲学以及人类主体在系统故障中的作用。
Ergonomics. 2011 Aug;54(8):679-83. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2011.592607.
10
Medication prescribing errors in the prehospital setting and in the ED.院前和急诊科的用药处方错误。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.04.023. Epub 2011 Jul 8.