Suppr超能文献

符合加拿大修订后的经济评估指南的骨质疏松症药物治疗的成本效益

Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacological Treatments for Osteoporosis Consistent with the Revised Economic Evaluation Guidelines for Canada.

作者信息

Coyle Doug

机构信息

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and Division of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Health & Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK. The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Jan 30;4(1):2381468318818843. doi: 10.1177/2381468318818843. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.

Abstract

Given the lack of independent analyses comparing numerous pharmacotherapies for osteoporosis, the study objective was to identify the optimal osteoporosis treatment based on a woman's age, fracture history, and ability to tolerate oral bisphosphonates adopting practices recommended in the recently revised Canadian guidelines. A cost utility analysis from the health care system perspective compared alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab, and no pharmacotherapy using a Markov model incorporating data on fracture risk and their associated costs, mortality, and disutility and treatment effect. Stratified analysis was conducted based on age, fracture history, and ability to tolerate oral bisphosphonates. Expected lifetime outcomes were obtained through probabilistic analysis with scenario analyses addressing methodological and structural uncertainty. For women able to tolerate oral bisphosphonates, risedronate and etidronate were dominated. Compared to no therapy, alendronate was either dominant or was associated with a low incremental cost per QALY (quality-adjusted life years) gained (ICER)-less than CAN$3,751 based on age and fracture history. In comparison with alendronate, both zoledronate and denosumab were either dominated or associated with a high ICER-greater than CAN$660,000 per QALY. For women unable to tolerate bisphosphonates, dependent on age and fracture history, the ICER for zoledronate versus no therapy ranged from CAN$17,770 to CAN$94,365 per QALY. For all strata, denosumab was dominated by zoledronate or had an ICER greater than CAN$3.0 million. Scenario analyses found consistent findings. Based on a threshold of CAN$50,000 per QALY, alendronate is optimal for osteoporotic women who can tolerate oral bisphosphonates regardless of age or fracture history. For women unable to tolerate oral bisphosphonates, zoledronate is optimal for women with previous fracture or aged 80 to 84 or over 90 with no previous fracture.

摘要

鉴于缺乏对多种骨质疏松症药物疗法进行比较的独立分析,本研究的目的是根据女性的年龄、骨折史以及按照最近修订的加拿大指南中推荐的做法耐受口服双膦酸盐的能力,确定最佳的骨质疏松症治疗方法。从医疗保健系统的角度进行成本效用分析,使用马尔可夫模型比较阿仑膦酸钠、依替膦酸钠、利塞膦酸钠、唑来膦酸、地诺单抗以及不进行药物治疗的情况,该模型纳入了骨折风险及其相关成本、死亡率、负效用和治疗效果的数据。根据年龄、骨折史和耐受口服双膦酸盐的能力进行分层分析。通过概率分析获得预期终身结果,并进行情景分析以解决方法学和结构不确定性。对于能够耐受口服双膦酸盐的女性,利塞膦酸钠和依替膦酸钠不占优势。与不治疗相比,阿仑膦酸钠要么占优势,要么与每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的低增量成本(ICER)相关联——根据年龄和骨折史,低于3751加元。与阿仑膦酸钠相比,唑来膦酸和地诺单抗要么不占优势,要么与高ICER相关联——每QALY超过660,000加元。对于无法耐受双膦酸盐的女性,根据年龄和骨折史,唑来膦酸与不治疗相比的ICER为每QALY 17,770加元至94,365加元。对于所有分层,地诺单抗被唑来膦酸所主导,或者ICER大于300万加元。情景分析得出了一致的结果。基于每QALY 50,000加元的阈值,对于能够耐受口服双膦酸盐的骨质疏松症女性,无论年龄或骨折史如何,阿仑膦酸钠都是最佳选择。对于无法耐受口服双膦酸盐的女性,唑来膦酸对于有既往骨折的女性或年龄在80至84岁或90岁以上且无既往骨折的女性是最佳选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验