Assessment of aortocoronary bypass graft patency by intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography compared to selective graft angiography.

The value of digital subtraction angiography (DSA), in assessing aortocoronary bypass graft patency, was evaluated by studying 22 consecutive patients with 54 aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass grafts, who had postoperative angina pectoris. Each patient underwent selective graft angiography and non-gated DSA. The DSA consisted of a run of 15 to 20 frames, taken at 2.3 frames per second during injection of diluted contrast in the ascending aorta, performed after a test exposure was made. Thirty-two of the 54 grafts (59%) were patent. Thirty of the 32 grafts were seen to be patent by both selective graft angiography and DSA. In addition, a further two grafts were found to be patent on DSA, but were not able to be selectively catheterised and were not seen on the conventional aortogram. Selective graft angiography revealed four tight proximal graft stenoses, of which one only was seen on DSA; and poor distal run-off in five grafts, two of which showed up as late filling grafts on DSA. In summary, the accuracy of intra-arterial DSA in assessment of bypass graft patency was excellent. All grafts seen to be patent on selective graft angiography were also seen by DSA alone and in addition two grafts which could not be selectively catheterised were found to be patent. However, in patients with postoperative chest pain, selective graft angiography is probably required as non-gated intra-arterial DSA does not provide sufficient information to assess graft stenoses, distal flow and the native coronary vessels.