Manoussakis M N, Garalea K L, Tzioufas A G, Moutsopoulos H M
Department of Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Greece.
Clin Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;7(4):465-9.
In this report, we examined whether immunofluorescent anti-nuclear antibody (FANA) test could be used as an initial screening test in identifying serum samples where subsequent testing for antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) and to double-stranded DNA (ds-DNA), would be worthwhile. For this purpose, we retrospectively analysed the results of tests for FANA (on Hep-2 cells, positive FANA titers greater than or equal to 1:80), anti-ENA (antibodies to Ro (SSA), La(SSB), U1 nRNP and Sm, by counterimmunoelectrophoresis) and anti-dsDNA (by enzyme-immunoassay) in the sera of 488 consecutive autoimmune patients. It was found that, among the 243 serum samples with negative FANA, only two each (0.8%), had anti-ENA (weak anti-Ro (SSA) and anti-dsDNA (in low levels), respectively. In contrast, anti-ENA and anti-dsDNA were present in 28.2% and 13.5%, respectively, of the 245 FANA-positive sera (p less than 0.00001). In addition, it was found that the probability of positive tests for antibodies to ENA and to dsDNA increases proportionally to the FANA titer (p less than 0.00001). We conclude that searching for anti-ENA and anti-dsDNA in FANA-negative serum samples is generally unjustifiable.
在本报告中,我们研究了免疫荧光抗核抗体(FANA)检测能否作为一种初始筛查检测,用于识别后续对可提取核抗原(ENA)抗体和双链DNA(ds-DNA)抗体进行检测是否有价值的血清样本。为此,我们回顾性分析了488例连续自身免疫性疾病患者血清中FANA(在Hep-2细胞上检测,阳性FANA滴度大于或等于1:80)、抗ENA(通过对流免疫电泳检测Ro(SSA)、La(SSB)、U1 nRNP和Sm抗体)和抗dsDNA(通过酶免疫测定)的检测结果。结果发现,在243份FANA阴性的血清样本中,仅有两份(0.8%)分别有抗ENA(弱抗Ro(SSA))和抗dsDNA(低水平)。相比之下,在245份FANA阳性血清中,抗ENA和抗dsDNA的阳性率分别为28.2%和13.5%(p<0.00001)。此外,还发现ENA抗体和dsDNA抗体检测呈阳性的概率与FANA滴度成正比增加(p<0.00001)。我们得出结论,在FANA阴性的血清样本中检测抗ENA和抗dsDNA通常是不合理的。