Wegener Veronika, Rarack Stephanie, Tiffe Theresa, Grill Eva, Melcher Carolin, Birkenmaier Christof, Jansson Volkmar, Wegener Bernd
Department of Orthopaedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University, Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße.
MediCenter am Klinikum Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Straße.
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 May;32(4):E214-E220. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000777.
This 2-step prospective randomized parallel trial evaluated postural stability in 65 back pain participants (61.6±7.9 y) and 50 nonback pain participants (61.2±8.6 y) in a first step using the MFT-S3-Check. In a second step, postural stability and questionnaires were evaluated in back pain participants before and after therapy with either whole body vibration therapy or classic physiotherapy.
The first aim was to investigate whether the MFT-S3-Check is suitable to evaluate differences in postural stability in back pain and nonback pain participants. The second aim was to evaluate the effect of whole body vibration therapy and classic physiotherapy on postural stability and the influence of depressive symptoms and pain.
Objective bodily measurement values in chronic back pain are rare; therefore, the evaluation of effectiveness of different therapies is difficult.
Postural stability was investigated using stability-, sensorimotor-, and symmetry indexes, in standing and seated positions with the MFT-S3-Check. The following standard questionnaires were used to investigate pain and depressive symptoms: HADS, ODI, NASS, SF-36.
No significant difference in postural stability was found between back pain participants and the nonback pain group. None of the two training concepts in back pain participants was superior, concerning postural stability and pain. Both treatments showed positive effects, with significant improvements in postural stability in the classic physiotherapy group. Depressive symptoms had a significant correlation with pain intensity in back pain participants.
The MFT-S3-Check could not find a significant difference in postural stability between the back pain and nonback pain group in the study setting. Postural stability improved after treatment.
这项两阶段前瞻性随机平行试验,第一步使用MFT-S3检查评估了65名背痛参与者(61.6±7.9岁)和50名无背痛参与者(61.2±8.6岁)的姿势稳定性。第二步,对背痛参与者在接受全身振动疗法或传统物理治疗前后的姿势稳定性和问卷进行了评估。
第一个目的是研究MFT-S3检查是否适合评估背痛和无背痛参与者在姿势稳定性方面的差异。第二个目的是评估全身振动疗法和传统物理治疗对姿势稳定性的影响以及抑郁症状和疼痛的影响。
慢性背痛的客观身体测量值很少见;因此,评估不同疗法的有效性很困难。
使用MFT-S3检查,通过稳定性、感觉运动和对称性指标,在站立和坐姿下研究姿势稳定性。使用以下标准问卷来调查疼痛和抑郁症状:医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、腰椎间盘疾病患者功能障碍指数(ODI)、北美脊柱协会(NASS)问卷、健康调查简表(SF-36)。
背痛参与者和无背痛组之间在姿势稳定性上没有发现显著差异。在姿势稳定性和疼痛方面,背痛参与者的两种训练方案都没有更优。两种治疗都显示出积极效果,传统物理治疗组的姿势稳定性有显著改善。背痛参与者的抑郁症状与疼痛强度有显著相关性。
在本研究中,MFT-S3检查未发现背痛组和无背痛组在姿势稳定性上有显著差异。治疗后姿势稳定性有所改善。