• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中心静脉置管能力和重症监护远程医疗减少严重脓毒症患者的医院间转院:混合方法设计。

Central Venous Access Capability and Critical Care Telemedicine Decreases Inter-Hospital Transfer Among Severe Sepsis Patients: A Mixed Methods Design.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2019 May;47(5):659-667. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003686.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003686
PMID:30730442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6465097/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Severe sepsis is a complex, resource intensive, and potentially lethal condition and rural patients have worse outcomes than urban patients. Early identification and treatment are important to improving outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify hospital-specific factors associated with inter-hospital transfer.

DESIGN

Mixed method study integrating data from a telephone survey and retrospective cohort study of state administrative claims.

SETTING AND SUBJECTS

Survey of Iowa emergency department administrators between May 2017 and June 2017 and cohort of adults seen in Iowa emergency departments for severe sepsis and septic shock between January 2005 and December 2013.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of inter-hospital transfer. We included 114 institutions that provided data (response rate = 99%), and responses were linked to a total of 150,845 visits for severe sepsis/septic shock. In our adjusted model, having the capability to place central venous catheters or having a subscription to a tele-ICU service was independently associated with lower odds of inter-hospital transfer (adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86 and adjusted odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.54-0.88, respectively). A facility's participation in a sepsis-specific quality improvement initiative was associated with 62% higher odds of transfer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10-2.39).

CONCLUSIONS

The insertion of central venous catheters and access to a critical care physician during sepsis treatment are important capabilities in hospitals that transfer fewer sepsis patients. In the future, hospital-specific capabilities may be used to identify institutions as regional sepsis centers.

摘要

目的

严重脓毒症是一种复杂、资源密集型且可能致命的疾病,农村患者的预后比城市患者差。早期识别和治疗对改善预后至关重要。本研究的目的是确定与医院间转院相关的医院特定因素。

设计

混合方法研究,整合了电话调查数据和对 2005 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月间爱荷华州急诊部门因严重脓毒症和感染性休克就诊的成人回顾性队列研究数据。

地点和对象

2017 年 5 月至 6 月期间对爱荷华州急诊部门管理员进行调查,2005 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月间对爱荷华州急诊部门因严重脓毒症和感染性休克就诊的成人进行队列研究。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

多变量逻辑回归用于确定医院间转院的独立预测因素。我们纳入了提供数据的 114 家机构(应答率=99%),这些机构的应答与 150845 例严重脓毒症/感染性休克就诊相关。在调整后的模型中,具备放置中心静脉导管的能力或订阅远程 ICU 服务与较低的医院间转院几率独立相关(调整后比值比,0.69;95%置信区间,0.54-0.86 和调整后比值比,0.69;95%置信区间,0.54-0.88)。医疗机构参与脓毒症特定质量改进计划与转院几率增加 62%相关(调整后比值比,1.62;95%置信区间,1.10-2.39)。

结论

在脓毒症治疗期间插入中心静脉导管和获得重症监护医生的支持是转院较少的脓毒症患者所在医院的重要能力。未来,医院的特定能力可用于确定作为区域脓毒症中心的机构。

相似文献

1
Central Venous Access Capability and Critical Care Telemedicine Decreases Inter-Hospital Transfer Among Severe Sepsis Patients: A Mixed Methods Design.中心静脉置管能力和重症监护远程医疗减少严重脓毒症患者的医院间转院:混合方法设计。
Crit Care Med. 2019 May;47(5):659-667. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003686.
2
Implementing a collaborative protocol in a sepsis intervention program: lessons learned.在脓毒症干预项目中实施协作方案:经验教训。
Lung. 2011 Feb;189(1):11-9. doi: 10.1007/s00408-010-9266-z. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
3
Inter-hospital transfer is associated with increased mortality and costs in severe sepsis and septic shock: An instrumental variables approach.医院间转运与严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率增加及成本上升相关:一种工具变量法。
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
4
Telemedicine Use Decreases Rural Emergency Department Length of Stay for Transferred North Dakota Trauma Patients.远程医疗的使用缩短了北达科他州创伤患者转院后的急诊停留时间。
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Mar;24(3):194-202. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0083. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Interhospital Transfer Delays Appropriate Treatment for Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.院内转院延迟会影响严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2589-96. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001301.
6
Transfer hospitalizations for pediatric severe sepsis or septic shock: resource use and outcomes.儿科严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克的转院治疗:资源利用和结局。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1577-5.
7
Rates and timing of central venous cannulation among patients with sepsis and respiratory arrest admitted by the emergency department*.急诊收治的脓毒症并呼吸骤停患者中心静脉置管的比例和时机*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):554-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a66a2a.
8
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
9
Double inter-hospital transfer in Sepsis patients presenting to the ED does not worsen mortality compared to single inter-hospital transfer.在急诊科就诊的脓毒症患者中,与单次院内转院相比,两次院内转院并不会增加死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
10
Impact of Telemonitoring of Critically Ill Emergency Department Patients Awaiting ICU Transfer.危重症急诊患者 ICU 转运前远程监护的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Sep;47(9):1201-1207. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003847.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Hospital Capability and Mortality in Sepsis: Development of a Sepsis-Related Hospital Capability Index.医院能力与脓毒症死亡率的关系:脓毒症相关医院能力指数的制定。
Crit Care Med. 2023 Nov 1;51(11):1479-1491. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005973. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
The impact of telehealth in sepsis care: A systematic review.远程医疗在脓毒症护理中的影响:一项系统综述。
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Jan;31(1):3-13. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231170038. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
Concept review of regionalized systems of acute care: Is regionalization the next frontier in sepsis care?

本文引用的文献

1
ICU Telemedicine Reduces Interhospital ICU Transfers in the Veterans Health Administration.重症监护病房远程医疗减少退伍军人健康管理局的医院间 ICU 转院。
Chest. 2018 Jul;154(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
Clinical and epidemiological variability in severe sepsis: an ecological study.严重脓毒症的临床和流行病学变异性:一项生态学研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Aug;72(8):741-745. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210501. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
3
The most commonly used disease severity scores are inappropriate for risk stratification of older emergency department sepsis patients: an observational multi-centre study.
急性护理区域化系统的概念综述:区域化是脓毒症护理的下一个前沿领域吗?
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jan 6;3(1):e12631. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12631. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
Telehealth in emergency medicine: A consensus conference to map the intersection of telehealth and emergency medicine.急诊医学中的远程医疗:绘制远程医疗与急诊医学交叉领域的共识会议。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;28(12):1452-1474. doi: 10.1111/acem.14330. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
5
TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study).远程医疗作为急诊科脓毒症的一种干预措施:一项多中心、比较有效性研究(TELEvISED 研究)。
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Feb;10(2):77-91. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0141. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Provider-to-provider telemedicine improves adherence to sepsis bundle care in community emergency departments.医疗机构间远程医疗可提高社区急诊科脓毒症治疗捆绑护理的依从性。
J Telemed Telecare. 2021 Sep;27(8):518-526. doi: 10.1177/1357633X19896667. Epub 2020 Jan 5.
7
Double inter-hospital transfer in Sepsis patients presenting to the ED does not worsen mortality compared to single inter-hospital transfer.在急诊科就诊的脓毒症患者中,与单次院内转院相比,两次院内转院并不会增加死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.11.018. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
最常用的疾病严重程度评分不适用于老年急诊科脓毒症患者的风险分层:一项观察性多中心研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Sep 11;25(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0436-3.
4
Association Between Hospital Case Volume of Sepsis, Adherence to Evidence-Based Processes of Care and Patient Outcomes.脓毒症医院病例数量、循证护理流程的依从性与患者预后之间的关联
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):980-988. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002409.
5
Case Volume-Outcomes Associations Among Patients With Severe Sepsis Who Underwent Interhospital Transfer.严重脓毒症患者院间转运的病例量-结局关联
Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):615-622. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002254.
6
Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的管理
JAMA. 2017 Feb 28;317(8):847-848. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0131.
7
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.
8
Rural Patients With Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Who Bypass Rural Hospitals Have Increased Mortality: An Instrumental Variables Approach.绕过乡村医院的严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克乡村患者死亡率增加:一种工具变量法
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):85-93. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002026.
9
Inter-hospital transfer is associated with increased mortality and costs in severe sepsis and septic shock: An instrumental variables approach.医院间转运与严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率增加及成本上升相关:一种工具变量法。
J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock: insights and comparisons to ProCESS, ProMISe, and ARISE.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期目标导向治疗:与ProCESS、ProMISe和ARISE研究的见解及比较
Crit Care. 2016 Jul 1;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1288-3.