用于诱导和维持克罗恩病缓解的抗生素。

Antibiotics for induction and maintenance of remission in Crohn's disease.

作者信息

Townsend Cassandra M, Parker Claire E, MacDonald John K, Nguyen Tran M, Jairath Vipul, Feagan Brian G, Khanna Reena

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 7;2(2):CD012730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012730.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several antibiotics have been evaluated in Crohn's disease (CD), however randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have produced conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for induction and maintenance of remission in CD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Register and Clinicaltrials.gov database from inception to 28 February 2018. We also searched reference lists and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs comparing antibiotics to placebo or an active comparator in adult (> 15 years) CD patients were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors screened search results and extracted data. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcomes were failure to achieve clinical remission and relapse. Secondary outcomes included clinical response, endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic relapse, histologic response, histologic remission, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, withdrawal due to AEs and quality of life. Remission is commonly defined as a Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) of < 150. Clinical response is commonly defined as a decrease in CDAI from baseline of 70 or 100 points. Relapse is defined as a CDAI > 150. For studies that enrolled participants with fistulizing CD, response was defined as a 50% reduction in draining fistulas. Remission was defined as complete closure of fistulas. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes. We calculated the mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% CI for continuous outcomes. GRADE was used to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs (N = 1303 participants) were eligible. Two trials were rated as high risk of bias (no blinding). Seven trials were rated as unclear risk of bias and four trials were rated as low risk of bias. Comparisons included ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) versus placebo, rifaximin (800 to 2400 mg daily) versus placebo, metronidazole (400 mg to 500 mg twice daily) versus placebo, clarithromycin (1 g/day) versus placebo, cotrimoxazole (960 mg twice daily) versus placebo, ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) and metronidazole (250 mg four time daily) versus methylprednisolone (0.7 to 1 mg/kg daily), ciprofloxacin (500 mg daily), metronidazole (500 mg daily) and budesonide (9 mg daily) versus placebo with budesonide (9 mg daily), ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) versus mesalazine (2 g twice daily), ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) with adalimumab versus placebo with adalimumab, ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) with infliximab versus placebo with infliximab, clarithromycin (750 mg daily) and antimycobacterial versus placebo, and metronidazole (400 mg twice daily) and cotrimoxazole (960 mg twice daily) versus placebo. We pooled all antibiotics as a class versus placebo and antibiotics with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) versus placebo with anti-TNF.The effect of individual antibiotics on CD was generally uncertain due to imprecision. When we pooled antibiotics as a class, 55% (289/524) of antibiotic participants failed to achieve remission at 6 to 10 weeks compared with 64% (149/231) of placebo participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.98; 7 studies; high certainty evidence). At 10 to 14 weeks, 41% (174/428) of antibiotic participants failed to achieve a clinical response compared to 49% (93/189) of placebo participants (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.93; 5 studies; moderate certainty evidence). The effect of antibiotics on relapse in uncertain. Forty-five per cent (37/83) of antibiotic participants relapsed at 52 weeks compared to 57% (41/72) of placebo participants (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.47; 2 studies; low certainty evidence). Relapse of endoscopic remission was not reported in the included studies. Antibiotics do not appear to increase the risk of AEs. Thirty-eight per cent (214/568) of antibiotic participants had at least one adverse event compared to 45% (128/284) of placebo participants (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.02; 9 studies; high certainty evidence). The effect of antibiotics on serious AEs and withdrawal due to AEs was uncertain. Two per cent (6/377) of antibiotic participants had at least one adverse event compared to 0.7% (1/143) of placebo participants (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.29 to 10.01; 3 studies; low certainty evidence). Nine per cent (53/569) of antibiotic participants withdrew due to AEs compared to 12% (36/289) of placebo participants (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.29; 9 studies; low certainty evidence) is uncertain. Common adverse events in the studies included gastrointestinal upset, upper respiratory tract infection, abscess formation and headache, change in taste and paraesthesiaWhen we pooled antibiotics used with anti-TNF, 21% (10/48) of patients on combination therapy failed to achieve a clinical response(50% closure of fistulas) or remission (closure of fistulas) at week 12 compared with 36% (19/52) of placebo and anti-TNF participants (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.10; 2 studies; low certainty evidence). These studies did not assess the effect of antibiotics and anti-TNF on clinical or endoscopic relapse. Seventy-seven per cent (37/48) of antibiotics and anti-TNF participants had an AE compared to 83% (43/52) of anti-TNF and placebo participants (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.12; 2 studies, moderate certainty evidence). The effect of antibiotics and anti-TNF on withdrawal due to AEs is uncertain. Six per cent (3/48) of antibiotics and anti-TNF participants withdrew due to an AE compared to 8% (4/52) of anti-TNF and placebo participants (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.45; 2 studies, low certainty evidence). Common adverse events included nausea, vomiting, upper respiratory tract infections, change in taste, fatigue and headache AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate to high quality evidence suggests that any benefit provided by antibiotics in active CD is likely to be modest and may not be clinically meaningful. High quality evidence suggests that there is no increased risk of adverse events with antibiotics compared to placebo. The effect of antibiotics on the risk of serious adverse events is uncertain. The effect of antibiotics on maintenance of remission in CD is uncertain. Thus, no firm conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for maintenance of remission in CD can be drawn. More research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of antibiotics as therapy in CD.

摘要

背景

已对多种抗生素在克罗恩病(CD)中的疗效进行了评估,但随机对照试验(RCT)产生了相互矛盾的结果。

目的

评估抗生素在诱导和维持CD缓解中的疗效和安全性。

检索方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL、Cochrane IBD小组专业注册库和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库,检索时间从建库至2018年2月28日。我们还检索了参考文献列表和会议论文集。

入选标准

纳入比较抗生素与安慰剂或活性对照药在成人(>15岁)CD患者中疗效的RCT。

数据收集与分析

两位作者筛选检索结果并提取数据。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚。主要结局为未实现临床缓解和复发。次要结局包括临床反应、内镜反应、内镜缓解、内镜复发、组织学反应、组织学缓解、不良事件(AE)、严重AE、因AE退出研究和生活质量。缓解通常定义为克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)<150。临床反应通常定义为CDAI较基线下降70或100分。复发定义为CDAI>150。对于纳入有瘘管型CD患者的研究,反应定义为引流瘘管减少50%。缓解定义为瘘管完全闭合。我们计算二分结局的风险比(RR)和相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)。我们计算连续结局的数据的平均差(MD)和相应的95%CI。采用GRADE评估证据的确定性。

主要结果

13项RCT(N = 1303名参与者)符合纳入标准。两项试验被评为高偏倚风险(未设盲)。7项试验被评为偏倚风险不明确,4项试验被评为低偏倚风险。比较包括环丙沙星(每日500mg,分两次服用)与安慰剂、利福昔明(每日800至2400mg)与安慰剂、甲硝唑(每日400至500mg,分两次服用)与安慰剂、克拉霉素(每日1g)与安慰剂、复方新诺明(每日960mg,分两次服用)与安慰剂、环丙沙星(每日500mg,分两次服用)和甲硝唑(每日250mg,分四次服用)与甲泼尼龙(每日0.7至1mg/kg)、环丙沙星(每日500mg)、甲硝唑(每日500mg)和布地奈德(每日9mg)与安慰剂加布地奈德(每日9mg)、环丙沙星(每日500mg,分两次服用)与美沙拉嗪(每日2g,分两次服用)、环丙沙星(每日500mg,分两次服用)联合阿达木单抗与安慰剂联合阿达木单抗、环丙沙星(每日500mg,分两次服用)联合英夫利昔单抗与安慰剂联合英夫利昔单抗、克拉霉素(每日750mg)加抗分枝杆菌药物与安慰剂、甲硝唑(每日400mg,分两次服用)和复方新诺明(每日960mg,分两次服用)与安慰剂。我们将所有抗生素作为一类与安慰剂进行汇总分析,并将抗生素联合抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)药物与安慰剂联合抗TNF药物进行汇总分析。由于数据不精确,个别抗生素对CD的影响通常不确定。当我们将抗生素作为一类进行汇总分析时,6至10周时,55%(289/524)使用抗生素的参与者未实现缓解,而安慰剂组为64%(149/231)(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.76至0.98;7项研究;高确定性证据)。在10至14周时,41%(174/428)使用抗生素的参与者未实现临床反应,而安慰剂组为49%(93/189)(RR 0.77,95%CI 0.64至0.93;5项研究;中度确定性证据)。抗生素对复发的影响不确定。52周时,45%(37/83)使用抗生素的参与者复发,而安慰剂组为57%(41/72)(RR 0.87,95%CI 0.52至1.47;2项研究;低确定性证据)。纳入研究中未报告内镜缓解的复发情况。抗生素似乎不会增加AE的风险。38%(214/568)使用抗生素的参与者至少发生一次不良事件,而安慰剂组为45%(128/284)(RR 0.87,95%CI 0.75至1.02;9项研究;高确定性证据)。抗生素对严重AE和因AE退出研究的影响不确定。2%(6/377)使用抗生素的参与者至少发生一次严重不良事件,而安慰剂组为0.7%(1/143)(RR 1.70,95%CI 0.29至10.01;3项研究;低确定性证据)。9%(53/569)使用抗生素的参与者因AE退出研究,而安慰剂组为12%(36/289)(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.57至1.29;9项研究;低确定性证据),结果不确定。研究中常见的不良事件包括胃肠道不适、上呼吸道感染、脓肿形成以及头痛、味觉改变和感觉异常。当我们将抗生素与抗TNF药物联合使用进行汇总分析时,联合治疗组中21%(10/48)的患者在第12周时未实现临床反应(瘘管闭合50%)或缓解(瘘管闭合),而安慰剂联合抗TNF药物组为36%(19/52)(RR 0.57,95%CI 0.29至1.10;2项研究;低确定性证据)。这些研究未评估抗生素与抗TNF药物对临床或内镜复发的影响。77%(37/48)使用抗生素联合抗TNF药物的参与者发生AE,而抗TNF药物联合安慰剂组为83%(43/52)(RR 0.93,95%CI 0.76至1.12;2项研究,中度确定性证据)。抗生素与抗TNF药物联合使用对因AE退出研究的影响不确定。6%(3/48)使用抗生素联合抗TNF药物的参与者因AE退出研究,而抗TNF药物联合安慰剂组为8%(4/52)(RR 0.82,95%CI 0.19至3.45;2项研究,低确定性证据)。常见的不良事件包括恶心、呕吐、上呼吸道感染、味觉改变、疲劳和头痛。

作者结论

中到高质量的证据表明,抗生素在活动性CD中提供的任何益处可能都很有限,可能没有临床意义。高质量的证据表明,与安慰剂相比,抗生素不会增加不良事件的风险。抗生素对严重不良事件风险的影响不确定。抗生素对CD缓解维持的影响不确定。因此,关于抗生素在CD缓解维持中的疗效和安全性无法得出确切结论。需要更多研究来确定抗生素作为CD治疗方法的疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索