Clinical Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka Medical College Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug;100(8):1458-1466. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
To investigate which clinical assessments are suitable for differentiating patients who fall from patients who do not fall in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH).
Prospective observational study.
Osaka Medical College Hospital.
Patients with a cerebrospinal fluid tap test (TT) result meeting the diagnosis criteria for iNPH (N=68).
Not applicable.
Participants were assessed before the TT based on the following: timed Up and Go (TUG), 10-meter walk test (10MWT), Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), isometric quadriceps strength (QS), and a history of falls within the past 6 months.
The full area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curves and 95% confidence interval were found to be 0.651 (95% confidence interval, 0.503-0.775) for the TUG, 0.692 (95% confidence interval, 0.540-0.812) for the 10MWT, 0.869 (95% confidence interval, 0.761-0.933) for the FGA, and 0.796 (95% confidence interval, 0.663-0.886) for the BBS; except for QS, they all were identified as statistically significant predictive variables. In the TUG<20 seconds group (n=47), the FGA (AUC 0.849 [95% confidence interval, 0.698-0.932]) and BBS (AUC 0.734 [95% confidence interval, 0.550-0.862]) were found to be statistically significant predictive variables; however, the other assessments were not. In the TUG<15 seconds group (n=34), the FGA was found to be the only statistically significant predictive variable (AUC 0.842 [95% confidence interval, 0.640-0.942]), whereas the other assessments were not. The AUC of the FGA was statistically significantly greater than those of the other assessments.
Our findings indicate that patients with iNPH who fall experience falls due to dynamic balance dysfunction during gait rather than lower limb muscle strength. The FGA may be more suitable than other assessments for differentiating patients who fall from patients who do not fall in patients with mild iNPH.
探讨哪些临床评估适用于区分特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)患者中跌倒的患者和未跌倒的患者。
前瞻性观察性研究。
大阪医科大学医院。
符合 iNPH 脑脊液腰穿试验(TT)结果诊断标准的患者(N=68)。
无。
根据以下内容在 TT 前对参与者进行评估:计时起立行走测试(TUG)、10 米步行测试(10MWT)、功能性步态评估(FGA)、伯格平衡量表(BBS)、等长股四头肌力量(QS)和过去 6 个月内的跌倒史。
TUG 的受试者工作特征曲线的完整曲线下面积(AUC)和 95%置信区间为 0.651(95%置信区间,0.503-0.775),10MWT 的 AUC 为 0.692(95%置信区间,0.540-0.812),FGA 的 AUC 为 0.869(95%置信区间,0.761-0.933),BBS 的 AUC 为 0.796(95%置信区间,0.663-0.886);除 QS 外,所有这些均被确定为具有统计学意义的预测变量。在 TUG<20 秒组(n=47)中,FGA(AUC 0.849[95%置信区间,0.698-0.932])和 BBS(AUC 0.734[95%置信区间,0.550-0.862])被发现具有统计学意义的预测变量;然而,其他评估则没有。在 TUG<15 秒组(n=34)中,仅发现 FGA 是具有统计学意义的唯一预测变量(AUC 0.842[95%置信区间,0.640-0.942]),而其他评估则没有。FGA 的 AUC 明显大于其他评估。
我们的研究结果表明,iNPH 跌倒患者在步态中由于动态平衡功能障碍而跌倒,而不是下肢肌肉力量。FGA 可能比其他评估更适合区分轻度 iNPH 中跌倒的患者和未跌倒的患者。