School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
J Mol Diagn. 2019 May;21(3):418-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
The analysis of circulating tumor DNA provides a minimally invasive molecular interrogation that has the potential to guide treatment selection and disease monitoring. Here, the authors evaluated a custom UltraSEEK melanoma panel for the MassARRAY system, probing for 61 mutations over 13 genes. The analytical sensitivity and clinical accuracy of the UltraSEEK melanoma panel was compared with droplet digital PCR. The blinded analysis of 68 mutations detected in 48 plasma samples from stage IV melanoma patients revealed a concordance of 88% between the two platforms. Further comparison of both methods for the detection of BRAF V600E mutations in 77 plasma samples demonstrated a Cohen's κ of 0.826 (bias-corrected and accelerated 95% CI, 0.669-0.946). These results indicate that the UltraSEEK melanoma panel is as sensitive as droplet digital PCR for the detection of circulating tumor DNA in this cohort of patients but highlight the need for detected variants to be confirmed orthogonally to mitigate any false-positive results. The MassARRAY system enables rapid and sensitive genotyping for the detection of multiple melanoma-associated mutations in plasma.
循环肿瘤 DNA 的分析提供了一种微创的分子检测方法,具有指导治疗选择和疾病监测的潜力。在这里,作者评估了 MassARRAY 系统上的一个定制 UltraSEEK 黑色素瘤面板,用于检测 13 个基因中的 61 个突变。与数字液滴 PCR 相比,UltraSEEK 黑色素瘤面板的分析灵敏度和临床准确性。在来自 IV 期黑色素瘤患者的 48 个血浆样本中检测到的 68 个突变的盲法分析显示,两种平台之间的一致性为 88%。进一步比较两种方法在 77 个血浆样本中检测 BRAF V600E 突变的结果表明,Cohen's κ 为 0.826(偏倚校正和加速 95%置信区间为 0.669-0.946)。这些结果表明,UltraSEEK 黑色素瘤面板在该患者队列中检测循环肿瘤 DNA 的灵敏度与数字液滴 PCR 一样高,但强调需要对检测到的变异进行正交确认,以减少任何假阳性结果。MassARRAY 系统能够快速灵敏地进行基因分型,以检测血浆中多种与黑色素瘤相关的突变。