Gueli Alletti S, Cianci S, Perrone E, Fanfani F, Vascone C, Uccella S, Gallotta V, Vizzielli G, Fagotti A, Monterossi G, Scambia G, Rossitto C
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Department Woman and Child Health Sciences, Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Mar;234:218-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
To investigate the safety, feasibility and oncological adequacy of the Percutaneous Surgical System - PSS in a consecutive series of low-risk endometrial cancer staging.
From May 2015 to April 2017, we prospectively performed 30 consecutive percutaneous staging for low/intermediate risk endometrial cancer (FIGO stage IA G1-G2, IB G1-G2, IA G3). All patients were divided in two different groups on the basis of surgical procedure received: Group A included patients submitted to radical Class A hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; Group B concerned patients that received a lymph nodal assessment also.
The time needed to install percutaneous instruments and suprapubic trocar was 4 min. (range 2-10). The recorded median operative time (OT) was 80 min. (range 65-120) for Gr.A and 143 min. (range 107-190) for Gr.B, in which the median time of lymph nodal assessment was 55 min. (range 20-76). The median time for hysterectomy was 60 min. (range 40-110) in all cases. Lymph nodal assessment was performed in 14 (46.6%) cases: 7 sentinel node mapping, 7 pelvic lymphadenectomy. No intraoperative complications or LPS/LPT conversions were recorded. Median discharge time was 2 days (range 1-4), 5 patients were discharged in 3rd post-op day, and only 1 patient was discharged in 4th day for fever. All patients conveyed high satisfaction with the cosmetic results. A progressive overall reduction of pain perception was observed at 24 h after surgery. Median follow-up was of 14 months (range 12-36), no recurrences have been detected.
PSS seems to be a feasible approach for endometrial cancer staging. Larger experiences and prospective comparative studies are important to assess our assumptions and further investigate the real benefits of percutaneous surgical system.
在一系列连续的低风险子宫内膜癌分期中,研究经皮手术系统(PSS)的安全性、可行性及肿瘤学适宜性。
2015年5月至2017年4月,我们前瞻性地对30例低/中风险子宫内膜癌(国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期IA期G1 - G2、IB期G1 - G2、IA期G3)患者进行了连续的经皮分期。所有患者根据接受的手术程序分为两组:A组包括接受根治性A类子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术的患者;B组包括还接受了淋巴结评估的患者。
安装经皮器械和耻骨上套管针所需时间为4分钟(范围2 - 10分钟)。记录的A组中位手术时间(OT)为80分钟(范围65 - 120分钟),B组为143分钟(范围107 - 190分钟),其中B组淋巴结评估的中位时间为55分钟(范围20 - 76分钟)。所有病例中子宫切除术的中位时间为60分钟(范围40 - 110分钟)。14例(46.6%)患者进行了淋巴结评估:7例前哨淋巴结定位,7例盆腔淋巴结清扫术。未记录到术中并发症或转为腹腔镜手术/开腹手术的情况。中位出院时间为2天(范围1 - 4天),5例患者在术后第3天出院,仅1例患者因发热在第4天出院。所有患者对美容效果表示高度满意。术后24小时观察到疼痛感知总体逐渐减轻。中位随访时间为14个月(范围12 - 36个月),未检测到复发情况。
PSS似乎是子宫内膜癌分期的一种可行方法。更多的经验和前瞻性比较研究对于评估我们的假设以及进一步研究经皮手术系统的实际益处很重要。