• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何在评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的不匹配分级中协调超声心动图、计算机断层扫描和混合成像?

How Do We Reconcile Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid Imaging in Assessing Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec/Québec Heart and Lung Institute, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):267-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.027
PMID:30732722
Abstract

Up to 40% of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) present with a "discordant grading" usually referred to as "low-gradient AS." This article presents a step-by-step integrative approach overview of the utility, limitations, and complementary role of the different imaging modalities for the assessment of AS severity with a special emphasis on the reconciliation of discordant grading. The first step is to confirm the validity of echocardiographic measures of AS severity. For example, hybrid imaging can combine left ventricular outflow tract area measured by 3-dimensional echocardiography or contrast enhanced multidetector row computed tomography with flow velocities measured by Doppler. The next step is to differentiate severe from non-severe AS with the use of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography, especially in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction, low-flow, low-gradient AS. Aortic valve calcium scoring measured by noncontrast multidetector row computed tomography is preferred in patients with low-gradient AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction as well as in those with inconclusive results with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

摘要

高达 40%的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者存在“不一致分级”,通常被称为“低梯度 AS”。本文提出了一种逐步综合的方法,概述了不同影像学方法在评估 AS 严重程度方面的应用、局限性和互补作用,特别强调了不一致分级的协调。第一步是确认超声心动图评估 AS 严重程度的有效性。例如,混合成像可以将 3 维超声心动图或对比增强多排 CT 测量的左心室流出道面积与多普勒测量的血流速度相结合。下一步是使用低剂量多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图来区分严重和非严重 AS,特别是在左心室射血分数低、低流量、低梯度 AS 的患者中。对于低梯度 AS 且左心室射血分数保留的患者,以及多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图结果不确定的患者,推荐使用非增强多排 CT 测量主动脉瓣钙评分。

相似文献

1
How Do We Reconcile Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid Imaging in Assessing Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity?如何在评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的不匹配分级中协调超声心动图、计算机断层扫描和混合成像?
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):267-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.027.
2
Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Solving the Conundrum Using Multi-Modality Imaging.低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄:应用多模态影像学解决难题。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Nov-Dec;61(5-6):416-422. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Cardiac Imaging for Assessing Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.评估轻中度主动脉瓣狭窄的心脏影像学检查。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.002.
4
Imaging Strategies for Evaluating Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis with Reduced and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.评估左心室射血分数降低和保留的低流量、低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄的影像学策略。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2019 Jul 27;21(9):94. doi: 10.1007/s11886-019-1186-9.
5
The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study.不和谐严重钙化主动脉瓣疾病分级的复杂性:联合多普勒超声心动图和计算机断层扫描研究的新见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 17;62(24):2329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
Value of low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography on defining true severe low gradient aortic stenosis in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.小剂量多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图在明确左心室射血分数保留患者真正严重的低跨瓣压差主动脉瓣狭窄中的价值
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec;34(12):1877-1887. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1416-z. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
7
Usefulness of global left ventricular longitudinal strain for risk stratification in low ejection fraction, low-gradient aortic stenosis: results from the multicenter True or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis study.整体左心室纵向应变在低射血分数、低跨瓣压差主动脉瓣狭窄危险分层中的应用价值:多中心真性或假性重度主动脉瓣狭窄研究结果
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;8(3):e002117. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002117.
8
Assessment of aortic valve calcium load by multidetector computed tomography. Anatomical validation, impact of scanner settings and incremental diagnostic value.多排螺旋 CT 评估主动脉瓣钙负荷。解剖学验证、扫描参数的影响和增量诊断价值。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep-Oct;11(5):360-366. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
9
Diagnostic Value of Aortic Valve Calcification Levels in the Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣钙化程度对低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄评估的诊断价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug;17(8):847-860. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 May 22.
10
Adjudication of Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Severity: Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography and MSCT Are Complementary, Not Competitive.低流量、低跨瓣压差主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的判定:多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图与多层螺旋CT是互补而非竞争关系。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Aug;17(8):861-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.04.018. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Discordance between aortic valve gradient and area: do I trust the significant gradient?主动脉瓣压差与瓣口面积之间的不一致:我是否应该相信显著的压差?
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2025 Apr 16;27(Suppl 3):iii111-iii116. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suaf027. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Prevalence of low-flow state by automated machine-learning 3D echocardiography in patients with moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis and normal ejection-fraction.自动机器学习三维超声心动图评估中度至重度主动脉瓣狭窄且射血分数正常患者低流量状态的患病率
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03398-7.
3
[Clinical application of cardiac computed tomography : Current recommendations].
[心脏计算机断层扫描的临床应用:当前建议]
Herz. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s00059-025-05310-4.
4
Aortic Valve Calcium Score: Applications in Clinical Practice and Scientific Research-A Narrative Review.主动脉瓣钙化评分:在临床实践与科研中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 11;13(14):4064. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144064.
5
Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Setting the Record Straight.左心室射血分数保留的不一致性低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄:澄清事实。
JACC Adv. 2023 Mar 22;2(2):100263. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100263. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Impact of Stress Echocardiography on Aortic Valve Stenosis Management.负荷超声心动图对主动脉瓣狭窄管理的影响
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 14;13(12):3495. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123495.
7
A Multimodality Video-Based AI Biomarker For Aortic Stenosis Development And Progression.一种基于多模态视频的人工智能生物标志物用于主动脉瓣狭窄的发生和进展
medRxiv. 2024 Feb 29:2023.09.28.23296234. doi: 10.1101/2023.09.28.23296234.
8
An alternative method of indexation in aortic stenosis: height-adjusted effective orifice area : An observational prospective study.一种主动脉瓣狭窄的指数化替代方法:身高校正的有效瓣口面积:一项观察性前瞻性研究。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2023 Aug 22;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12947-023-00314-8.
9
Performance of Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Aortic Valve Area for Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.基于计算机断层扫描血管造影的主动脉瓣口面积评估主动脉瓣狭窄的性能。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Aug 15;12(16):e029973. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029973. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
10
Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score.使用机器学习预测主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后:主动脉瓣狭窄风险(ASteRisk)评分。
Open Heart. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001990.