• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习预测主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后:主动脉瓣狭窄风险(ASteRisk)评分。

Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Open Heart. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001990.

DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2022-001990
PMID:35641101
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9157386/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To use echocardiographic and clinical features to develop an explainable clinical risk prediction model in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), including those with low-gradient AS (LGAS), using machine learning (ML).

METHODS

In 1130 patients with moderate or severe AS, we used bootstrap lasso regression (BLR), an ML method, to identify echocardiographic and clinical features important for predicting the combined outcome of all-cause mortality or aortic valve replacement (AVR) within 5 years after the initial echocardiogram. A separate hold out set, from a different centre (n=540), was used to test the generality of the model. We also evaluated model performance with respect to each outcome separately and in different subgroups, including patients with LGAS.

RESULTS

Out of 69 available variables, 26 features were identified as predictive by BLR and expert knowledge was used to further reduce this set to 9 easily available and input features without loss of efficacy. A ridge logistic regression model constructed using these features had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 for the combined outcome of mortality/AVR. The model reliably identified patients at high risk of death in years 2-5 (HRs ≥2.0, upper vs other quartiles, for years 2-5, p<0.05, p=not significant in year 1) and was also predictive in the cohort with LGAS (n=383, HRs≥3.3, p<0.05). The model performed similarly well in the independent hold out set (AUC 0.78, HR ≥2.5 in years 1-5, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In two separate longitudinal databases, ML identified prognostic features and produced an algorithm that predicts outcome for up to 5 years of follow-up in patients with AS, including patients with LGAS. Our algorithm, the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score, is available online for public use.

摘要

目的

使用超声心动图和临床特征,通过机器学习(ML)为主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者(包括低梯度 AS [LGAS]患者)开发一个可解释的临床风险预测模型。

方法

在 1130 名中重度 AS 患者中,我们使用了一种 ML 方法——Bootstrap 套索回归(BLR),来识别对预测初始超声心动图后 5 年内全因死亡率或主动脉瓣置换(AVR)的复合结局有重要意义的超声心动图和临床特征。使用来自不同中心的另一个独立验证集(n=540)来测试模型的通用性。我们还分别评估了模型在不同亚组中的表现,包括 LGAS 患者。

结果

在 69 个可用变量中,有 26 个特征通过 BLR 被确定为具有预测性,然后使用专家知识进一步将该组特征减少至 9 个易于获取且不影响疗效的输入特征。使用这些特征构建的岭逻辑回归模型对死亡率/AVR 的复合结局的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.74。该模型可靠地识别出 2-5 年内死亡风险较高的患者(2-5 年内 HR≥2.0,上四分位数比其他四分位数,p<0.05,p=第 1 年无统计学意义),并且在 LGAS 患者队列中也具有预测性(n=383,HR≥3.3,p<0.05)。该模型在独立验证集中的表现也相当出色(AUC 0.78,HR≥2.5,1-5 年,p<0.05)。

结论

在两个独立的纵向数据库中,ML 确定了预后特征,并生成了一种算法,可预测 AS 患者长达 5 年的随访结果,包括 LGAS 患者。我们的算法,即主动脉瓣狭窄风险(ASteRisk)评分,可在线供公众使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/dda6e6485c6f/openhrt-2022-001990f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/b6179b82bcea/openhrt-2022-001990f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/4bb3b30a1844/openhrt-2022-001990f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/69395891b5a5/openhrt-2022-001990f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/3ba0758236be/openhrt-2022-001990f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/9d605a790ba5/openhrt-2022-001990f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/99dbe50e9eed/openhrt-2022-001990f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/e87c8a6feabd/openhrt-2022-001990f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/dda6e6485c6f/openhrt-2022-001990f08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/b6179b82bcea/openhrt-2022-001990f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/4bb3b30a1844/openhrt-2022-001990f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/69395891b5a5/openhrt-2022-001990f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/3ba0758236be/openhrt-2022-001990f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/9d605a790ba5/openhrt-2022-001990f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/99dbe50e9eed/openhrt-2022-001990f06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/e87c8a6feabd/openhrt-2022-001990f07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/391a/9157386/dda6e6485c6f/openhrt-2022-001990f08.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score.使用机器学习预测主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后:主动脉瓣狭窄风险(ASteRisk)评分。
Open Heart. 2022 May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-001990.
2
Long-term outcomes after valve replacement for low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch.低跨瓣压差主动脉瓣狭窄瓣膜置换术后的长期预后:人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的影响
Circulation. 2006 Jul 4;114(1 Suppl):I553-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001180.
3
Risk Prediction in Aortic Valve Replacement: Incremental Value of the Preoperative Echocardiogram.主动脉瓣置换术中的风险预测:术前超声心动图的增量价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct 26;4(10):e002129. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002129.
4
A Machine-Learning Framework to Identify Distinct Phenotypes of Aortic Stenosis Severity.一种用于识别主动脉狭窄严重程度的不同表型的机器学习框架。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Sep;14(9):1707-1720. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Diastolic dysfunction and clinical outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with atypical aortic valve stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗非典型主动脉瓣狭窄患者的舒张功能障碍和临床结局。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2024 Apr 1;25(4):318-326. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001597. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
6
Impact of Managing Provider Type on Severe Aortic Stenosis Management and Mortality.管理提供者类型对严重主动脉瓣狭窄管理和死亡率的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e025164. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025164. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
7
Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis-Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.低流量/低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄——仍然是一个诊断和治疗难题。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):654-659. doi: 10.1002/clc.22728. Epub 2017 May 23.
8
Artificial Intelligence Trumps TAVI-SCORE and CoreValve Score in Predicting 1-Year Mortality Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.人工智能在预测经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 1 年死亡率方面优于 TAVI-SCORE 和 CoreValve 评分。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Mar;24:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.010. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
9
Incremental Prognostic Use of Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic/Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Severe Bioprosthetic Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Redo Aortic Valve Replacement.左心室整体纵向应变在接受再次主动脉瓣置换术的无症状/症状轻微的重度生物瓣主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的增量预后价值
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005942.
10
The Association between Aortic Valve Weight, Echocardiographic Indices, and All-Cause Death in 1,046 Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.1046 例主动脉瓣狭窄患者行主动脉瓣置换术后主动脉瓣重量、超声心动图指标与全因死亡的关系。
Cardiology. 2020;145(4):251-261. doi: 10.1159/000505870. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in the Heart of Medicine: A Systematic Approach to Transforming Arrhythmia Care with Intelligent Systems.医学核心领域的人工智能:利用智能系统转变心律失常护理的系统方法。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2025;21(4):e1573403X334095. doi: 10.2174/011573403X334095241205041550.
2
Machine Learning Prediction for Prognosis of Patients With Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄患者预后的机器学习预测
JACC Adv. 2024 Aug 14;3(9):101135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101135. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Artificial Intelligence in the Screening, Diagnosis, and Management of Aortic Stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020 ACC/AHA 瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Feb 2;77(4):450-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.035. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis.跨瓣流量决定主动脉瓣狭窄主动脉瓣面积的预后价值。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 21;75(15):1758-1769. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.02.046.
3
人工智能在主动脉瓣狭窄的筛查、诊断及管理中的应用
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 17;25(1):31. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2501031. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Enhanced detection of severe aortic stenosis via artificial intelligence: a clinical cohort study.人工智能增强重度主动脉瓣狭窄的检测:一项临床队列研究。
Open Heart. 2023 Jul;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002265.
5
Machine learning prediction of progressive subclinical myocardial dysfunction in moderate aortic stenosis.中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行性亚临床心肌功能障碍的机器学习预测
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 30;10:1153814. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1153814. eCollection 2023.
6
The Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Valvular Heart Disease.人工智能在心脏瓣膜病中的新兴作用。
Heart Fail Clin. 2023 Jul;19(3):391-405. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model.
计算开发临床预测模型所需的样本量。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 18;368:m441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m441.
4
Flow Rate in Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Tool, Hemodynamic Insight, or Both?主动脉瓣狭窄中的血流速度:临床工具、血流动力学见解,还是两者兼具?
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020 Apr;33(4):449-451. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
Choosing Clinical Variables for Risk Stratification Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome.选择急性冠状动脉综合征后风险分层的临床变量。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 10;9(1):14631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50933-3.
6
Poor Long-Term Survival in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis.中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期生存状况不佳。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 15;74(15):1851-1863. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
8
How Do We Reconcile Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, and Hybrid Imaging in Assessing Discordant Grading of Aortic Stenosis Severity?如何在评估主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度的不匹配分级中协调超声心动图、计算机断层扫描和混合成像?
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):267-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.027.
9
Timing of intervention in aortic stenosis: a review of current and future strategies.主动脉瓣狭窄的干预时机:当前及未来策略综述
Heart. 2018 Dec;104(24):2067-2076. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312304. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
10
Predicting Survival From Large Echocardiography and Electronic Health Record Datasets: Optimization With Machine Learning.从大型超声心动图和电子健康记录数据集预测生存:机器学习优化。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;12(4):681-689. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.04.026. Epub 2018 Jun 13.