Suppr超能文献

原发结直肠癌及其转移灶的生物标志物一致性。

Biomarker concordance between primary colorectal cancer and its metastases.

机构信息

Colorectal & Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.

Colorectal & Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2019 Feb;40:363-374. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.050. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of biomarkers to target anti-EGFR treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is well-established, requiring molecular analysis of primary or metastatic biopsies. We aim to review concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic sites.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of all published studies (1991-2018) reporting on biomarker concordance between primary CRC and its metastatic site(s) was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines using several medical databases. Studies without matched samples or using peripheral blood for biomarker analysis were excluded.

FINDINGS

61 studies including 3565 patient samples were included. Median biomarker concordance for KRAS (n = 50) was 93.7% [67-100], NRAS (n = 11) was 100% [90-100], BRAF (n = 22) was 99.4% [80-100], and PIK3CA (n = 17) was 93% [42-100]. Meta-analytic pooled discordance was 8% for KRAS (95% CI = 5-10%), 8% for BRAF (95% CI = 5-10%), 7% for PIK3CA (95% CI = 2-13%), and 28% overall (95% CI = 14-44%). The liver was the most commonly biopsied metastatic site (n = 2276), followed by lung (n = 438), lymph nodes (n = 1123), and peritoneum (n = 132). Median absolute concordance in multiple biomarkers was 81% (5-95%).

INTERPRETATION

Metastatic CRC demonstrates high concordance across multiple biomarkers, suggesting that molecular testing of either the primary or liver and lung metastasis is adequate. More research on colorectal peritoneal metastases is required.

摘要

背景

使用生物标志物针对转移性结直肠癌(CRC)的抗 EGFR 治疗已经得到充分证实,需要对原发或转移活检进行分子分析。我们旨在回顾原发性 CRC 与其转移部位之间的一致性。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南,使用多个医学数据库,对所有发表的报告原发性 CRC 与其转移部位之间生物标志物一致性的研究(1991-2018 年)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。排除没有匹配样本或使用外周血进行生物标志物分析的研究。

结果

纳入 61 项研究,共包括 3565 例患者样本。KRAS(n=50)的中位生物标志物一致性为 93.7%[67-100],NRAS(n=11)为 100%[90-100],BRAF(n=22)为 99.4%[80-100],PIK3CA(n=17)为 93%[42-100]。KRAS 的荟萃分析汇总不一致率为 8%(95%CI=5-10%),BRAF 为 8%(95%CI=5-10%),PIK3CA 为 7%(95%CI=2-13%),总体为 28%(95%CI=14-44%)。最常活检的转移部位是肝脏(n=2276),其次是肺(n=438)、淋巴结(n=1123)和腹膜(n=132)。多个生物标志物的中位绝对一致性为 81%(5-95%)。

解释

转移性 CRC 在多个生物标志物上表现出高度一致性,表明对原发性肿瘤或肝脏和肺部转移灶进行分子检测即可。需要进一步研究结直肠腹膜转移。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/434f/6413540/c501e134d49a/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验