Department of Clinical Microbiology, Mater Misercordiae University Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
James and John Kirklin Institute for Research in Surgical Outcomes (KIRSO), University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Apr;38(4):364-373. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
Despite advances in device technology and treatment strategies, infection remains a major cause of adverse events (AEs) in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) patients. To characterize the epidemiology of MCS infection, we examined the type, location, and timing of infection in the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry (ISHLT) for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (IMACS) over 3 years, 2013 to 2015.
Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) definitions were used to categorize AE infections occurring in MCS patients within IMACS. The IMACS infection variables were mapped to ISHLT definitions for infection where feasible. Three categories of MCS infection were defined as ventricular assist device (VAD) specific, VAD related, and non-VAD.
There were 10,171 patients enrolled from January 2013 through December 2015. Infection was the most common AE, with 3,788 patients (37%) experiencing ≥ 1 infection, and 6,758 AE infections reported overall. Non-VAD infection was the largest category, 4,501: 34.0% pneumonias, 30.6% non-VAD-related bloodstream infections (BSIs), 24.15% urinary tract infections (UTIs), and 10.2% gastrointestinal infections. VAD-specific infection was the second largest category, 1,756: 82.9% driveline, 12.8% pocket, and 4.3% pump/or cannula infections. VAD-related infection was the smallest category, 501: 47.5% BSIs, 47.5% mediastinitis, and 5.0% mediastinitis/pocket infections. All 3 categories were more frequently reported ≤ 3 months after implant.
Non-VAD infection, including pneumonia, BSI, UTI, and gastrointestinal infection, was the leading category of infection in MCS patients and the most frequently reported ≤ 3 months after implant. These results provide evidence to support resourcing and strengthening infection prevention strategy early after implantation in MCS.
尽管设备技术和治疗策略取得了进步,但感染仍然是机械循环支持 (MCS) 患者不良事件 (AE) 的主要原因。为了描述 MCS 感染的流行病学特征,我们在 2013 年至 2015 年的国际心肺移植学会 (ISHLT) 机械辅助循环支持 (IMACS) 中检查了 3 年内 MCS 感染的类型、部位和时间。
采用 Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 定义对 IMACS 中发生的 MCS 患者的 AE 感染进行分类。将 IMACS 感染变量映射到 ISHLT 感染定义中(在可行的情况下)。将 MCS 感染分为三类:心室辅助装置 (VAD) 特异性、VAD 相关和非 VAD。
2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间共纳入 10171 例患者。感染是最常见的 AE,有 3788 例(37%)患者发生≥1 次感染,共报告 6758 例 AE 感染。非 VAD 感染是最大的类别,有 4501 例:34.0%肺炎,30.6%非 VAD 相关血流感染 (BSI),24.15%尿路感染 (UTI) 和 10.2%胃肠道感染。VAD 特异性感染是第二大类别,有 1756 例:82.9% 导线,12.8% 囊袋,4.3% 泵/套管感染。VAD 相关感染是最小的类别,有 501 例:47.5% BSI,47.5% 纵隔炎和 5.0% 纵隔炎/囊袋感染。所有 3 个类别在植入后≤3 个月内的报告频率更高。
非 VAD 感染,包括肺炎、BSI、UTI 和胃肠道感染,是 MCS 患者感染的主要类别,也是植入后≤3 个月内最常报告的感染。这些结果为在 MCS 植入后早期为资源配置和加强感染预防策略提供了依据。