• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回肠造口环钻直径和面积的放射学进展。

Radiological progression of end colostomy trephine diameter and area.

机构信息

University of Exeter Medical School Exeter UK.

Department of Mathematics University of Exeter Exeter UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2018 Oct 24;3(1):112-118. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50109. eCollection 2019 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50109
PMID:30734022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6354228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Development of a parastomal hernia is common following abdominoperineal excision (APE). The true incidence is difficult to assess fully owing to differing lengths of follow-up and techniques used to assess herniation; radiological or clinical. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate colostomy diameter by studying the rate of change of axial and sagittal trephine diameters, trephine area, and the ratio of the trephine over time. A secondary aim was to investigate variation in trephine area and variables affecting parasternal hernia over time.

METHODS

Serial CT scans performed after APE from January 2006 to December 2014 were reviewed. Variables analysed included age, sex, trephine position relative to rectus abdominis muscle (RAM), type of incision for stoma creation, and axial and sagittal trephine diameters measured on follow-up CT. A Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework was used to examine the relationship of trephine diameters, area and ratio over time.

RESULTS

Of 112 patients undergoing APE, 103 were eligible for analysis; this included 91 colostomies (88·3 per cent) through the RAM and 12 (11·7 per cent) lateral to the RAM. Median age of the patients was 68 years. Sixty patients (58·3 per cent) had a circular and 43 (41·7 per cent) a cruciate incision for stoma creation. The sagittal trephine diameter increased by 0·22 (95 per cent credible interval 0·12 to 0·32) mm/month for both sexes. Women reported a significant increase in axial trephine diameters; the male : female ratio difference was -0·17 (-0·30 to -0·03) mm/month and for trephine areas -6·21 (0·96 to 13·7) mm/month. Patient age, colostomy trephine location and shape of incision were not statistically significant variables for parasternal hernia.

CONCLUSION

Female sex was the only variable affecting the rate of increase in axial trephine diameter and trephine area over time.

摘要

背景

经腹会阴联合切除术(APE)后,发生造口旁疝较为常见。由于随访时间和评估疝的技术(影像学或临床)不同,很难全面评估真实发病率;原发目的本研究旨在通过研究轴向和矢状环钻直径、环钻面积以及随时间变化的环钻比值的变化率,评估结肠造口直径。次要目的是研究随时间变化的环钻面积和影响造口旁疝的变量。

方法

回顾 2006 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月 APE 后的连续 CT 扫描。分析的变量包括年龄、性别、环钻相对于腹直肌(RAM)的位置、造口切口类型、以及随访 CT 上测量的轴向和矢状环钻直径。采用贝叶斯层次模型框架来检验环钻直径、面积和比值随时间的关系。

结果

在 112 例接受 APE 的患者中,有 103 例符合分析条件;其中 91 例(88.3%)通过 RAM 进行结肠造口,12 例(11.7%)位于 RAM 外侧。患者中位年龄为 68 岁。60 例(58.3%)患者采用圆形切口,43 例(41.7%)采用十字形切口。无论性别,矢状环钻直径每月增加 0.22(95%可信区间 0.12 至 0.32)mm。女性轴向环钻直径增加显著,男女差异为-0.17(-0.30 至-0.03)mm/月,环钻面积差异为-6.21(0.96 至 13.7)mm/月。患者年龄、结肠造口环钻位置和切口形状不是影响胸骨旁疝的统计学显著变量。

结论

女性是影响轴向环钻直径和环钻面积随时间增加的唯一变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/f26685ba678d/BJS5-3-112-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/d8fb25130e07/BJS5-3-112-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/f119131f5f29/BJS5-3-112-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/5fa4c1a7c2c0/BJS5-3-112-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/42d442a6ec4e/BJS5-3-112-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/f26685ba678d/BJS5-3-112-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/d8fb25130e07/BJS5-3-112-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/f119131f5f29/BJS5-3-112-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/5fa4c1a7c2c0/BJS5-3-112-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/42d442a6ec4e/BJS5-3-112-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f76b/6354228/f26685ba678d/BJS5-3-112-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Radiological progression of end colostomy trephine diameter and area.回肠造口环钻直径和面积的放射学进展。
BJS Open. 2018 Oct 24;3(1):112-118. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50109. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Radiological incidence of parastomal herniation in cancer patients with permanent colostomy: what is the ideal size of the surgical aperture?永久性肠造口术的癌症患者发生造口旁疝的放射学发生率:理想的手术孔径是多大?
Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):425-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
3
Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of Parastomal Hernia Development After End Colostomy.经肛门结肠造口术后发生造口旁疝的临床和放射学预测因素。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan;216(1):94-103. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22498. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
4
Parastomal hernia.造口旁疝
Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):784-93. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4220.
5
Short-term outcomes of parastomal hernia prophylaxis with Stapled Mesh stomA Reinforcement Technique (SMART) in permanent stomas.吻合器网片造口加固技术(SMART)预防永久性造口旁疝的短期结局
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jun;91(6):1185-1189. doi: 10.1111/ans.16420. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
6
Prevention of parastomal hernia by intraperitoneal onlay mesh reinforcement at the time of stoma formation.在造口形成时使用腹腔内补片加强预防吻合口旁疝。
Hernia. 2012 Dec;16(6):655-60. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0947-9. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
7
Methods of Colostomy Construction: No Effect on Parastomal Hernia Rate: Results from Stoma-const-A Randomized Controlled Trial.造口术构建方法:对造口旁疝发生率无影响:来自 Stoma-const-A 随机对照试验的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):640-647. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003843.
8
Preventing parastomal hernia with modified stapled mesh stoma reinforcement technique (SMART) in patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer: a case-control study.采用改良吻合器网片造口加固技术(SMART)预防直肠癌手术患者的造口旁疝:一项病例对照研究。
Hernia. 2018 Apr;22(2):379-384. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1723-7. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
9
The lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma (LRAPS) in the construction of end colostomies, loop ileostomies and ileal conduits.在末端结肠造口术、袢式回肠造口术和回肠造口术的构建中,采用横向腹直肌定位造口术(LRAPS)。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):803-808. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02275-7. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Use of prophylactic stoma mesh is a risk factor for developing rectus abdominis muscle atrophy.使用预防性造口网片是发生腹直肌萎缩的一个危险因素。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):517-523. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02580-3. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.预防性补片在预防造口旁疝中的应用:当前证据
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jul 30;4:15011. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.15011. eCollection 2025.
2
Propensity Score Analysis of the Utility of Supervised Perioperative Abdominal Wall Exercises for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia.监督性围手术期腹壁运动预防造口旁疝效用的倾向评分分析
Nurs Rep. 2025 Feb 8;15(2):62. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15020062.
3
A risk prediction model based on machine learning algorithm for parastomal hernia after permanent colostomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain & Ireland (ACPGBI): Guidelines for the Management of Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus (2017) - Follow Up, Lifestyle and Survivorship.大不列颠及爱尔兰结直肠外科学会(ACPGBI):《结肠、直肠和肛管癌管理指南(2017年)-随访、生活方式与生存》
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jul;19 Suppl 1:67-70. doi: 10.1111/codi.13706.
2
European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias.欧洲疝学会的造口旁疝分类。
Hernia. 2014 Feb;18(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1162-z. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
3
Risk factors for parastomal hernia in Japanese patients with permanent colostomy.
基于机器学习算法的永久性结肠造口术后粪袋周围疝风险预测模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 8;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02627-8.
4
Proof of concept of an experimental prototype for the prevention of parastomal hernia.预防造口旁疝的实验原型概念验证。
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1997-2009. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01898-0. Epub 2024 May 27.
5
Virtual simulation of the biomechanics of the abdominal wall with different stoma locations.不同造口位置的腹壁生物力学的虚拟模拟。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 3;12(1):3545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07555-z.
6
Comparison of different modalities for the diagnosis of parastomal hernia: a systematic review.比较不同方法诊断造口旁疝的效果:系统评价。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Feb;35(2):199-212. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03499-5. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
7
Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation.直肠旁外侧与经直肠造口术预防造口旁疝的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 24;4(4):CD009487. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009487.pub3.
日本永久性结肠造口术患者造口旁疝的危险因素。
Surg Today. 2014 Aug;44(8):1465-9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0721-3. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
4
Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28-30 June 2012.腹壁修复结局结果报告建议:2012 年 6 月 28-30 日在意大利巴勒莫召开的共识会议结果。
Hernia. 2013 Aug;17(4):423-33. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1108-5. Epub 2013 May 15.
5
Radiological incidence of parastomal herniation in cancer patients with permanent colostomy: what is the ideal size of the surgical aperture?永久性肠造口术的癌症患者发生造口旁疝的放射学发生率:理想的手术孔径是多大?
Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):425-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
6
The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments.肠造口旁疝的持续挑战:文献回顾与未来发展。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 May;15(5):e202-14. doi: 10.1111/codi.12156.
7
Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia.造口旁疝的发病率及危险因素
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012 Oct;28(5):241-6. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.241. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
8
Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature.手术治疗造口旁疝的技术:文献系统综述。
Ann Surg. 2012 Apr;255(4):685-95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824b44b1.
9
Parastomal hernia repair outcomes in relation to stoma site with diisocyanate cross-linked acellular porcine dermal collagen mesh.应用异氰酸酯交联去细胞猪真皮胶原补片修补造口旁疝的疗效观察。
Hernia. 2011 Aug;15(4):433-7. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0791-3. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
10
Minimal anatomical disruption in stoma formation: the lateral rectus abdominis positioned stoma (LRAPS).在造口形成过程中最小的解剖破坏:外侧腹直肌定位造口术(LRAPS)。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Oct;12(10):1049-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02178.x.