Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Jul;29(4):448-455. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12476. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Caries risk assessment in preschool children has been limited validated.
To validate caries predictive ability of Cariogram using different combinations of factors and settings in preschool children from areas with high caries risk.
Two to five years old children (N = 175) were examined for caries (cavitated and non-cavitated lesions), at baseline and after 1 and 2 years. Mutans streptococci counts (MS) and saliva buffer capacity (SBC) were measured with chair side tests. Diet and oral health attitude were assessed through a parental questionnaire. Baseline caries risk was calculated using standard and high-risk group variables in Cariogram either with nine factors or excluding MS and SBC. Poisson regression models, ROC analysis and information criteria (AIC and BIC), P < 0.05, were used to investigate the predictive ability of Cariograms and to quantify the associations.
Accuracy of Cariogram was found limited. Cariograms with MS showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity than those without bacterial counts. Standard set Cariograms with MS counts performed slightly better than the other models, but the difference was not statistically significant. Caries prediction with standard and high set Cariograms was also found limited.
Cariogram with various factors and settings displayed suboptimal ability to predict caries in this population.
儿童龋齿风险评估的方法有限且经过验证。
验证 Cariogram 在高龋风险地区的学龄前儿童中使用不同因素和设置组合预测龋齿的能力。
对 175 名 2 至 5 岁的儿童进行龋齿(龋洞和非龋洞病变)检查,基线时和随访 1 年和 2 年后。使用椅旁检测测量变形链球菌计数(MS)和唾液缓冲能力(SBC)。通过家长问卷调查评估饮食和口腔健康态度。使用 Cariogram 中的标准和高风险组变量,结合 9 个因素或排除 MS 和 SBC,计算基线龋齿风险。使用泊松回归模型、ROC 分析和信息标准(AIC 和 BIC),P<0.05,评估 Cariogram 的预测能力并量化相关性。
发现 Cariogram 的准确性有限。包含 MS 的 Cariogram 具有更高的敏感性,但特异性较低。包含 MS 计数的标准 Cariogram 比其他模型略好,但差异无统计学意义。标准和高风险 Cariogram 对龋齿的预测也有限。
不同因素和设置的 Cariogram 预测该人群龋齿的能力欠佳。