Wang Xi, Wang Chao-Yu, Xu Wen, Yang Hong-Liang, Zhao Hai-Feng, Wang Xiao-Fang, Wang Ya-Fei, Yu Yong, Zhang Yi-Zhuo
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy in Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Tianjin 300060, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy in Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer,Tianjin 300060, China.E-mail:
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb;27(1):52-60. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2019.01.009.
To compare the prognostic value of different staging systems in primary intestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma(PI-DLPCL), and their correlation with clinicopathological characteristics,treatment and prognosis of PI-DLBCL.
A total of 68 patients with PI-DLBCL were recruited from January 2009 to July 2017. All the patients underwent staging by using TNM, Lugano, Blackledge and Musshoff system, survival curves for the PI-DLBCL patients were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method and were judged by the log-rank test. The accuracy of each staging system for predicting survival of PI-DLBCL patients was evaluated by calculating the area under curve(AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic(ROC). The correlation of the 4 staging systems, clinical features patients and treatment regimes with PFS and OS were analysed.
The median follow-up time was 52 (1-105) months, the median PFS time was 41(1-86) months, patients did not reached the median OS time. The most frequently involved site was ileocecal (30.9%), followed by small intestine (29.4%) and colon (29.4%), multiple sites involvement (7.4%) and rectum (2.94%).The PFS and OS rates at 5-year were 44.9% and 51.1%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test results showed that using different staging systems to describe the cumulative retention rates of PFS and OS in PI-DLBCL patients, none of the 4 staging systems can distinguish the survival curves of each stage significantly. The results of ROC curve showed that the prediction ability of the Lugano staging system was better than other staging system for 1 year PFS (AUC=0.826;P=0.015)and 1 year OS(AUC=0-792;P=0.001) in PI-DLBCL patients. The 3 year PFS rate in the operation+chemo or radio-therapy group (62 cases) and the single operation group (6 cases) were 53.9% and 16. 7%,respectively(P=0.116),The 3 year OS rate were 66.7% and 16.7%(P=0.015),respectively. Patients who received chemotherapy combined with rituximab had a higher 3-year PFS(66.0% vs 44.0%,P=0.139) and 3.year OS(70.2% vs.39.2%,P=0.148).The patients with ileocecal lesion had higher PFS rate and OS rate than other sites(P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that only bone marrow invasion was an independent prognostic factor in patients with PFS.
Bone marrow invasion is an independent risk factor for PFS in patients with PI-DLBCL , according to this limited preliminary data,Lugano staging system for stratifying and predicting the prognosis of PI-DLBCL patients is better than other staging system.
比较不同分期系统对原发性肠道弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(PI-DLPCL)的预后价值,及其与PI-DLBCL临床病理特征、治疗和预后的相关性。
选取2009年1月至2017年7月期间共68例PI-DLBCL患者。所有患者均采用TNM、卢加诺、布莱克利奇和穆斯霍夫系统进行分期,采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制PI-DLBCL患者的生存曲线,并通过对数秩检验进行判断。通过计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)评估各分期系统预测PI-DLBCL患者生存的准确性。分析4种分期系统、临床特征、患者及治疗方案与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的相关性。
中位随访时间为52(1-105)个月,中位PFS时间为41(1-86)个月,患者未达到中位OS时间。最常累及的部位是回盲部(30.9%),其次是小肠(29.4%)和结肠(29.4%)、多部位受累(7.4%)和直肠(2.94%)。5年时的PFS率和OS率分别为44.9%和51.1%。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和对数秩检验结果显示,使用不同分期系统描述PI-DLBCL患者PFS和OS的累积保留率,4种分期系统均不能显著区分各阶段的生存曲线。ROC曲线结果显示,卢加诺分期系统对PI-DLBCL患者1年PFS(AUC=0.826;P=0.015)和1年OS(AUC=0.792;P=0.001)的预测能力优于其他分期系统。手术+化疗或放疗组(62例)和单纯手术组(6例)的3年PFS率分别为53.9%和16.7%(P=0.116),3年OS率分别为66.7%和16.7%(P=0.015)。接受化疗联合利妥昔单抗治疗的患者3年PFS(66.0%对44.0%,P=0.139)和3年OS(70.2%对39.2%,P=0.148)较高。回盲部病变患者的PFS率和OS率高于其他部位(P<0.05)。多因素Cox回归分析表明,仅骨髓侵犯是PFS患者的独立预后因素。
骨髓侵犯是PI-DLBCL患者PFS的独立危险因素,根据这一有限的初步数据,卢加诺分期系统在分层和预测PI-DLBCL患者预后方面优于其他分期系统。