Fan Bin, Huang Fen, Zhang Yu-Hong, Mei Gan-Hong
PICC Outpatient Clinic,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China.E-mail:
PICC Outpatient Clinic,The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China.
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Feb;27(1):272-276. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2019.01.044.
To evaluate the effects of peripheral introvascular central catheters (PICC) on the catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and the formations of catheter-related bloodstream infections.
Total of 483 patients with hematologic malignancies admitted in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study, and 612 PICC catheterization were conducted. The median time of catheterization was 101 d (48 ∼ 184 d) . The incidence rates of CRBSI and CRTC were observed, and the CRBSI and CRTC associated variables were also analyzed.
There were 47 cases of CRBSI (7.7%), and the incidence was 0.59‰ PICC days, and there were 16 cases of CRTC (2.6%), with the incidence of 0.20‰ PICC days. Meanwhile, no other related serious complications found. The Cox regression analysis of CRBSI and CRTC-associated variables showed that the acute leukemia was significantly related with a higher incidence of CRBSI as compared with the other type of disease, however, which was not significantly related with the CRTC.
Compared with the traditional CVAD catheterization, the PICC is more safe and effective for the patients with malignant tumors, thus which may become a alternative method for CVAD.
评估外周静脉中心静脉导管(PICC)对导管相关血流感染(CRBSI)及导管相关血栓形成的影响。
选取2013年1月至2016年12月在我院收治的483例血液系统恶性肿瘤患者,共进行612次PICC置管。置管中位时间为101天(48~184天)。观察CRBSI和CRTC的发生率,并分析与CRBSI和CRTC相关的变量。
发生CRBSI 47例(7.7%),发生率为0.59‰PICC日;发生CRTC 16例(2.6%),发生率为0.20‰PICC日。同时,未发现其他相关严重并发症。对CRBSI和CRTC相关变量进行Cox回归分析显示,与其他类型疾病相比,急性白血病与CRBSI发生率较高显著相关,但与CRTC无显著相关性。
与传统中心静脉导管置管相比,PICC对恶性肿瘤患者更安全有效,可能成为中心静脉导管的替代方法。