Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, C1A 4P3.
Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, C1A 4P3.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3392-3405. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15349. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
Lameness in dairy cattle is a major issue for the industry due to the effects on the welfare of the animal, the economic impact, and consumer perception. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of lameness and explore potential risk factors in the Maritime Provinces of Canada. Cows were scored for lameness and potential risk factors and were assessed in 46 freestall herds and 33 tiestall herds in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island. In freestall herds, lameness was assessed using the most common method, locomotion scoring. A cow with a gait score of ≥3 out of 5 was considered to be lame. In tiestall herds, lameness was assessed using an alternative method known as stall lameness scoring. This assessment consisted of observation of the cow for 4 behavioral changes: standing on the edge of the stall, shifting weight, resting a limb, and uneven weight bearing when moved side to side. A cow displaying 2 or more of these behaviors was considered to be lame. At the time of the assessment, other animal-, environmental-, and management-based measurements were collected. These measurements were used in multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine risk factors that were associated with lameness for both freestalls and tiestalls independently. The prevalence of lameness was 21% for freestall-housed cattle and 15% for tiestall-housed cattle. Of the 1,488 tiestall-housed cows that were assessed, 68% showed no behavioral changes, whereas 15, 15, 2, and <1% showed 1, 2, 3, or 4 changes, respectively. In freestalls, higher odds of lameness were seen when cows spent ≥3 h/d in the holding area for milking compared with those that spent <3 h/d. In tiestall herds, higher odds of lameness were seen when bedding material was wet compared with when it was dry. For both lactating cow facility types, housing the dry cows and heifers on a deep bedded pack compared with tiestalls or freestalls was associated with a decreased odds of lameness. There were also many cow-level variables associated with lameness, including parity, daily milk production, stage of production, body condition, and width at the tuber coxae (hook bones). If producers become aware of the risk factors associated with lameness, they can make informed decisions on where to implement changes to help reduce the level of lameness in their herd.
奶牛跛行是一个对行业有重大影响的问题,因为它会影响动物的福利、经济影响和消费者认知。本研究的目的是确定加拿大海洋省份跛行的流行率,并探讨潜在的风险因素。在新斯科舍省、新不伦瑞克省和爱德华王子岛的 46 个自由卧床饲养场和 33 个围栏卧床饲养场中,对奶牛进行跛行评估和潜在风险因素评估。在自由卧床饲养场中,使用最常见的运动评分法评估跛行。步态评分为 5 分制,得分≥3 分的奶牛被认为跛行。在围栏卧床饲养场中,使用一种称为卧床跛行评分的替代方法评估跛行。这种评估包括观察奶牛的 4 种行为变化:站在牛栏边缘、改变体重分布、休息一条腿以及在左右移动时承重不均。显示出 2 种或更多这些行为的奶牛被认为跛行。在评估时,还收集了其他动物、环境和管理方面的测量数据。这些测量数据用于多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与自由卧床和围栏卧床饲养场的跛行相关的风险因素。自由卧床饲养场奶牛跛行的流行率为 21%,围栏卧床饲养场奶牛跛行的流行率为 15%。在评估的 1488 头围栏卧床饲养场奶牛中,68%没有表现出任何行为变化,而 15%、15%、2%和<1%分别表现出 1 种、2 种、3 种或 4 种变化。在自由卧床饲养场中,与每天在挤奶等候区停留<3 小时的奶牛相比,每天在挤奶等候区停留≥3 小时的奶牛跛行的可能性更高。在围栏卧床饲养场中,与垫料干燥时相比,当垫料潮湿时,奶牛跛行的可能性更高。对于两种泌乳牛设施类型,与围栏卧床或自由卧床相比,将干奶牛和小母牛饲养在深层卧床垫料上与跛行的可能性降低有关。还有许多与奶牛跛行相关的奶牛个体变量,包括胎次、日产量、产奶阶段、体况和坐骨结节宽度。如果生产者了解与跛行相关的风险因素,他们可以做出明智的决策,在何处实施改变,以帮助降低其牛群的跛行水平。