Institute for Ecopreneurship, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Hofackerstrasse 30, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland.
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Division, CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (CSIR-NEERI), Nehru Marg, Nagpur 440 020, Maharashtra, India.
J Environ Manage. 2019 Apr 15;236:396-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.014. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
The quest for improved living conditions in rapidly growing Indian communities puts pressure on natural resources and produces emissions which harm the environment, society and the economy. Current municipal solid waste (MSW) practices are an important example, as most waste remains untreated and is often deposited on unsafe dumpsites or burned on open fires. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is an option to treat the large biodegradable fraction ('biowaste'). In rural parts of India, the technology to supply energy from biogas has been promoted for 30 years. Biowaste treatment in urban MSW management and organic fertilizer ('digestate') production for agriculture via AD have more recently gained attention but with limited success so far. Recent environmental policies in waste, energy, agricultural and other sectors have, however, set important cornerstones for a broader diffusion in the coming years. On the basis of peer-reviewed literature and governmental reports, we identify barriers and enabling factors along the AD chain (biowaste to technology to product utilization), and analyse relevant boundary conditions for the new multi-sector policies. We show that AD implementation has repeatedly failed due to unrealistic assumptions on biowaste quantity and quality, underestimation of the complex biowaste supply chain, unsuitable AD designs and overestimation of economic returns from biogas and digestate. Local knowledge and capacities for planning and process control are lacking in many places and resources required for operation and maintenance in the long run have often been ignored. We found that the multi-facetted value propositions of AD - including biowaste treatment, energy and fertilizer products - have only been partially tapped due to the exclusive focus on biogas. The new sector policies provide important enabling factors for change. Decentralized AD plants operating on a few tons biowaste per day from reliable and manageable sources (e.g. fruit and vegetable markets) could be a more promising step forward than large-scale investments which rely on large biowaste volumes from various sources. The parallel development of biowaste management, planning tools for municipalities, standardized digestate monitoring protocols and studies on simple, low-cost optimization measures for methane recovery from a wide range of biowastes and innovative high-solid AD digester designs will be prerequisites for the long-term future of AD projects.
在快速发展的印度社区中,人们对改善生活条件的追求给自然资源带来了压力,并产生了破坏环境、社会和经济的排放物。当前的城市固体废物(MSW)处理方式就是一个重要的例子,因为大部分废物未经处理,通常被倾倒在不安全的垃圾场或露天焚烧。厌氧消化(AD)是处理大量可生物降解部分(“生物废物”)的一种选择。在印度农村地区,用沼气发电的技术已经推广了 30 年。最近,城市 MSW 管理中的生物废物处理和通过 AD 生产农业用有机肥料(“消化物”)引起了更多关注,但迄今为止收效有限。然而,废物、能源、农业和其他部门的新环境政策为未来几年的更广泛推广奠定了重要基石。基于同行评议的文献和政府报告,我们确定了 AD 链(生物废物到技术到产品利用)中的障碍和促成因素,并分析了新的多部门政策的相关边界条件。我们表明,由于对生物废物数量和质量的不切实际的假设、对复杂生物废物供应链的低估、不适合的 AD 设计以及对沼气和消化物的经济回报的高估,AD 的实施一再失败。许多地方缺乏规划和过程控制所需的本地知识和能力,长期运营和维护所需的资源经常被忽视。我们发现,由于只关注沼气,AD 的多方面价值主张——包括生物废物处理、能源和肥料产品——只得到了部分利用。新的部门政策为变革提供了重要的促成因素。每天从可靠和可管理的来源(如水果和蔬菜市场)处理几吨生物废物的分散式 AD 工厂可能比依赖各种来源大量生物废物的大规模投资更有希望。生物废物管理的平行发展、市政当局的规划工具、标准化的消化物监测协议以及对从各种生物废物中回收甲烷的简单、低成本优化措施的研究,以及创新的高固体 AD 消化器设计,将是 AD 项目长期未来的前提条件。