• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Effectiveness of a novel remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture].[新型保留残端的双向带刺缝线前交叉韧带重建术的有效性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 15;33(2):149-153. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201809132.
2
[Comparative study of I.D.E.A.L. technique and transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].[前交叉韧带重建中IDEAL技术与经胫骨技术的比较研究]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 15;38(8):987-994. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402029.
3
[Arthroscopic reinforced reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with autologous hamstring tendon and anchor suture band].关节镜下自体腘绳肌腱与锚钉缝线带强化重建前交叉韧带
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 15;35(2):171-177. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202008123.
4
[Prospective study on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preserving remnant anterior cruciate ligament by allograft ligament].同种异体韧带保留前交叉韧带残端重建前交叉韧带的前瞻性研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Aug;24(8):917-21.
5
[Case-control study on remnant-preserving strategy for preservation and reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament].[前交叉韧带保留与重建的残端保留策略病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Dec 25;34(12):1095-102. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.12.002.
6
[Comparison of femoral oval tunnel technique and round tunnel technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].单束前交叉韧带重建中股骨椭圆形隧道技术与圆形隧道技术的比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):323-329. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201908030.
7
[A comparative study of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via transtibial and transportal techniques].经胫骨与经髁间窝双隧道技术关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的对比研究
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Sep 15;33(9):1077-1082. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904124.
8
[Effectiveness of computer-assisted preoperative planning system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].[计算机辅助术前规划系统在前交叉韧带重建中的有效性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;27(12):1432-6.
9
[Tibialis anterior allograft versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:long-term clinical outcomes].前交叉韧带重建中同种异体胫骨前肌移植物与自体腘绳肌腱移植物的比较:长期临床结果
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Mar 25;34(3):269-74. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.03.016.
10
[Application of transosseous suture technique in repair of anterior cruciate ligament for multiple ligament injuries with knee dislocation].经骨缝合技术在膝关节脱位合并多发韧带损伤的前交叉韧带修复中的应用
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 15;34(2):190-195. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907075.

本文引用的文献

1
[Histological properties of autogenous hamstring grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].[前交叉韧带重建术后自体腘绳肌肌腱移植物的组织学特性]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 15;32(7):873-879. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201802001.
2
[Anatomical study of anterior cruciate ligament and its effect on reconstruction technique].前交叉韧带的解剖学研究及其对重建技术的影响
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 15;32(3):377-381. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201708038.
3
The difference in clinical outcome of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with and without remnant preservation: A meta-analysis.单束前交叉韧带重建术中保留与不保留残端的临床结果差异:一项荟萃分析。
Knee. 2016 Aug;23(4):566-74. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.07.010. Epub 2016 May 17.
4
Clinical outcomes of remnant preserving augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.前交叉韧带重建中保留残端增强术的临床疗效:一项系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):1976-85. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2749-8. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
5
Sparing the anterior cruciate ligament remnant: is it worth the hassle?保留前交叉韧带残端:值得麻烦吗?
Br Med Bull. 2012;104:91-111. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr053. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
6
Analysis of cyclops lesions after different anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a comparison of the single-bundle and remnant bundle preservation techniques.不同前交叉韧带重建术后独眼畸形的分析:单束和保留残束技术的比较。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Aug;41(8):997-1002. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1347-4. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
7
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using remnant preservation and a femoral tensioning technique: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results.保留残端和股骨拉紧技术的前交叉韧带重建:临床和磁共振成像结果。
Arthroscopy. 2011 Aug;27(8):1079-89. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
8
Immunohistochemical study of mechanoreceptors in the tibial remnant of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament in human knees.人体膝关节前交叉韧带断裂后胫骨残端中机械感受器的免疫组织化学研究
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Sep;17(9):1095-101. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0831-z. Epub 2009 Jun 16.
9
ACL tibial remnant, to save or not?前交叉韧带胫骨残端,留还是不留?
Orthopedics. 2008 Feb;31(2):154-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20080201-13.
10
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of remnant bundle using hamstring autograft: technical note.使用自体腘绳肌腱移植保留残束进行前交叉韧带重建:技术说明
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Aug;129(8):1011-5. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0597-7. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

[新型保留残端的双向带刺缝线前交叉韧带重建术的有效性]

[Effectiveness of a novel remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture].

作者信息

He Qingsong, Zhuang Leiting, An Zihao, Xu Wennan, Zhang Hangzhou

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery/Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001, P.R.China.

Department of Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery/Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang Liaoning, 110001,

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 15;33(2):149-153. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201809132.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201809132
PMID:30739406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8337612/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel remnant-preserving anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture.

METHODS

Between February 2014 and January 2016, 96 patients (96 knees) with ACL injury who met the inclusion criteria were recruited and randomly divided into 2 groups ( =48). All patients underwent ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon. The tibial remnant was fixed with PDS-Ⅱ suture (control group) and bidirectional barbed suture (trial group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, injury side, the interval from injury to operation, and preoperative knee stability (KT-1000 test), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score ( >0.05). The knee stability (KT-1000 test), IKDC score, Lysholm score, proprioception, and Cyclops lesion after operation were recorded.

RESULTS

All incisions healed by first intention in both groups. Forty-four patients in control group were followed up 26-47 months (mean, 36.6 months), and 45 patients in trial group were followed up 26-48 months (mean, 35.6 months). At last follow-up, the IKDC score, Lysholm score, and KT-1000 test were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones in both groups ( <0.05); but no significant difference was found between 2 groups ( >0.05). There was no significant difference in proprioception between 2 groups at 1 and 2 years after operation, and between 1 year after operation and 2 years after operation ( >0.05) in the same group. The incidences of Cyclops lesion at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after operation were 0, 4.44% (2/45), and 4.44% (2/45) in trial group, and 13.6% (6/44), 13.6% (6/44), 20.5% (9/44) in control group, showing significant differences between 2 groups at 6 months and at 2 years after operation ( =0.012; =0.022) and no significant difference at 1 year after operation ( =0.157).

CONCLUSION

The remnant-preserving ACL reconstruction with bidirectional barbed suture can decrease the incidence of Cyclops lesions. However, this technique can not improve the effectiveness in terms of the clinical function and stability compared with the traditional technique.

摘要

目的

探讨采用双向倒刺缝线进行新型保留残端前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的可行性和有效性。

方法

2014年2月至2016年1月,招募96例符合纳入标准的ACL损伤患者(96膝),随机分为2组(每组48例)。所有患者均采用自体肌腱进行ACL重建。胫骨残端分别用PDS -Ⅱ缝线固定(对照组)和双向倒刺缝线固定(试验组)。两组患者在年龄、性别、损伤侧、受伤至手术间隔时间以及术前膝关节稳定性(KT - 1000测试)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分和Lysholm评分方面均无显著差异(P>0.05)。记录术后膝关节稳定性(KT - 1000测试)、IKDC评分、Lysholm评分、本体感觉及Cyclops病变情况。

结果

两组切口均一期愈合。对照组44例患者随访26 - 47个月(平均36.6个月),试验组45例患者随访26 - 48个月(平均35.6个月)。末次随访时,两组IKDC评分、Lysholm评分及KT - 1000测试结果与术前相比均显著改善(P<0.05);但两组间比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。术后1年和2年两组间本体感觉无显著差异,同组术后1年与术后2年比较也无显著差异(P>0.05)。试验组术后6个月、1年和2年Cyclops病变发生率分别为0、4.44%(2/45)和4.44%(2/45),对照组分别为13.6%(6/44)、13.6%(6/44)、20.5%(9/44),术后6个月和2年两组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.012;P = 0.022),术后1年差异无统计学意义(P = 0.157)。

结论

采用双向倒刺缝线进行保留残端的ACL重建可降低Cyclops病变的发生率。然而,与传统技术相比,该技术在临床功能和稳定性方面并未提高有效性。