Godfrey Maureen, Cornwell Petrea, Eames Sally, Hodson Tenelle, Thomas Tara, Gillen Ailsa
Occupational Therapy Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Jun;66(3):249-257. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12561. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
The evidence base surrounding occupational therapy pre-discharge home visits discusses current practices, potential beneficial outcomes and limitations. However, research is limited, regarding how clinical teams determine which patients receive this service. This study aims to explore perceptions of occupational therapists and multidisciplinary stakeholders concerning pre-discharge home visits through their experiences and current practice in the Australian context.
A qualitative descriptive approach, using thematic analysis, was employed. Four focus groups were included, comprising 27 health professionals: novice occupational therapists (n = 6), experienced occupational therapists (n = 8), occupational therapy managers (n = 5), and multidisciplinary team members (n = 8).
Three key themes relating to pre-discharge home visits in clinical practice emerged. The first theme of 'Recognition of Clinical Factors' reflected that aspects of the person's occupational performance, environmental and care needs, were prime indicators considered for a pre-discharge home visit. Secondly, 'Contextual and Pragmatic Influences', described clinical setting realities as being significant considerations and strongly mediating practice. A third theme of 'Perceptions of Value' showed awareness of the utility of pre-discharge home visits, while also recognising need to enhance ongoing practice.
This qualitative study provides information on factors influencing decision-making regarding pre-discharge home visits from the hospital setting. Clinical factors were presented as key considerations, but clinicians' experiences and perceptions of contextual influences suggest an explanatory factor for practice variation. While multidisciplinary stakeholders' broadly demonstrated similar rationales for pre-discharge home visits as those of occupational therapists, therapists' decision-making processes for pre-discharge home visits were shaped by their experience level. Clinicians' experience finds pre-discharge home visits to have value and in the absence of clear evidence-based criteria for whom this element of practice should be provided, participants supported the development of a decision-making support tool to assist in decision-making.
围绕职业治疗出院前家访的证据基础探讨了当前的实践、潜在的有益结果和局限性。然而,关于临床团队如何确定哪些患者接受这项服务的研究有限。本研究旨在通过澳大利亚背景下职业治疗师和多学科利益相关者的经验及当前实践,探索他们对出院前家访的看法。
采用定性描述方法,运用主题分析法。纳入了四个焦点小组,由27名卫生专业人员组成:新手职业治疗师(n = 6)、经验丰富的职业治疗师(n = 8)、职业治疗经理(n = 5)和多学科团队成员(n = 8)。
出现了与临床实践中出院前家访相关的三个关键主题。第一个主题“临床因素的识别”反映出,个人职业表现、环境和护理需求等方面是考虑出院前家访的主要指标。其次,“背景和实际影响”描述了临床环境现实是重要的考虑因素,并对实践有强烈的调节作用。第三个主题“价值认知”表明了对出院前家访效用的认识,同时也认识到需要改进持续实践。
这项定性研究提供了有关影响医院出院前家访决策因素的信息。临床因素被视为关键考虑因素,但临床医生的经验以及对背景影响的看法表明了实践差异的一个解释因素。虽然多学科利益相关者对出院前家访的基本原理与职业治疗师大致相似,但治疗师出院前家访的决策过程受其经验水平影响。临床医生的经验表明出院前家访有价值,并且在缺乏关于应向哪些人提供这一实践环节的明确循证标准的情况下,参与者支持开发一种决策支持工具以协助决策。