• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猫和狗的前肢偏好:荟萃分析。

Paw preferences in cats and dogs: Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Biopsychology, Department of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University Bochum , Bochum , Germany.

Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University , Ankara , Turkey.

出版信息

Laterality. 2019 Nov;24(6):647-677. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2019.1578228. Epub 2019 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2019.1578228
PMID:30741091
Abstract

Predator-prey relationships have been suggested to be one of the primary evolutionary factors driving the development of functional hemispheric asymmetries. However, lateralization in many predator species is not well understood and existing studies often are statistically underpowered due to small sample sizes and they moreover show conflicting results. Here, we statistically integrated findings on paw preferences in cats and dogs, two predator species within the order that are commonly kept as pets in many societies around the globe. For both species, there were significantly more lateralized than non-lateralized animals. We found that 78% of cats and 68% of dogs showed either left- or right-sided paw preference. Unlike humans, neither dogs nor cats showed a rightward paw preference on the population level. For cats, but not dogs, we found a significant sex difference, with female animals having greater odds of being right-lateralized compared to male animals.

摘要

捕食者-猎物关系被认为是驱动功能半球不对称发展的主要进化因素之一。然而,许多捕食者物种的偏侧性尚不清楚,并且由于样本量小,现有研究通常在统计学上没有足够的效力,而且它们的结果也存在冲突。在这里,我们对猫和狗这两种在全球许多社会中通常作为宠物饲养的 目捕食者的爪子偏好进行了统计综合。对于这两个物种,明显有更多的偏侧性动物而非非偏侧性动物。我们发现,78%的猫和 68%的狗表现出左或右侧爪子偏好。与人类不同,狗和猫都没有表现出在种群水平上的右爪偏好。对于猫来说,但不是狗,我们发现了一个显著的性别差异,与雄性动物相比,雌性动物有更大的可能性是右侧偏侧性的。

相似文献

1
Paw preferences in cats and dogs: Meta-analysis.猫和狗的前肢偏好:荟萃分析。
Laterality. 2019 Nov;24(6):647-677. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2019.1578228. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
2
The distribution of paw preference in right-, left-, and mixed pawed male and female cats: the role of a female right-shift factor in handedness.右爪、左爪和混合爪的雄性和雌性猫的爪偏好分布:雌性右移因素在利手性中的作用。
Int J Neurosci. 1991 Aug;59(4):219-29. doi: 10.3109/00207459108985976.
3
Distribution of paw preference in mongrel and tortoise-shell cats and the relation of hemispheric weight to paw preference: sexual dimorphism in paw use and its relation to hemispheric weight.杂种猫和玳瑁猫的爪偏好分布以及半球重量与爪偏好的关系:爪使用中的性别二态性及其与半球重量的关系。
Int J Neurosci. 1993 Jun;70(3-4):199-212. doi: 10.3109/00207459309000575.
4
Paw preferences in mice and rats: Meta-analysis.鼠类的前肢偏好:荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Aug;127:593-606. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
Paw preferences in dogs.犬类的爪偏好
Int J Neurosci. 1987 Feb;32(3-4):825-9. doi: 10.3109/00207458709043336.
6
Stability of motor bias in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris.家犬(犬属)运动偏倚的稳定性
Behav Processes. 2018 Apr;149:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Measuring paw preferences in dogs, cats and rats: Design requirements and innovations in methodology.测量犬、猫和大鼠的爪偏好:方法学的设计要求和创新。
Laterality. 2024 May;29(3):246-282. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2024.2341459. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
The relationship between problem-solving ability and laterality in cats.猫的解决问题能力与侧化的关系。
Behav Brain Res. 2020 Aug 5;391:112691. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112691. Epub 2020 May 16.
9
Dog paw preference shows lability and sex differences.狗的爪子偏好表现出不稳定性和性别差异。
Behav Processes. 2006 Sep;73(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.011. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
10
Does owner handedness influence paw preference in dogs?主人的惯用手会影响狗的前肢偏好吗?
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01673-x. Epub 2022 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cortical thickness differences between hearing and perinatally deaf cats using ultra-high field MRI.使用超高场磁共振成像技术对比听力正常和围产期耳聋猫的皮质厚度差异。
Neuroimage Rep. 2024 Jul 3;4(3):100213. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2024.100213. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Kin selection as a modulator of human handedness: sex-specific, parental and parent-of-origin effects.亲缘选择作为人类利手的调节因素:性别特异性、亲本及亲本来源效应
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Aug 27;6:e32. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.24. eCollection 2024.
3
A novel electroencephalographic evaluation of noxious stimulation during isoflurane anesthesia in dogs.
犬异氟烷麻醉期间有害刺激的新型脑电图评估
Exp Anim. 2025 Jan 10;74(1):83-92. doi: 10.1538/expanim.24-0036. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
4
Functional mapping of the somatosensory cortex using noninvasive fMRI and touch in awake dogs.使用无创 fMRI 和触摸在清醒的狗身上进行躯体感觉皮层的功能映射。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Jun;229(5):1193-1207. doi: 10.1007/s00429-024-02798-0. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
5
Methodological comparison of cancellation versus two-way choice spatial attention tests in humans and dogs.人类和犬类中取消测试与双向选择空间注意力测试的方法学比较。
Front Vet Sci. 2023 Oct 13;10:1264151. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1264151. eCollection 2023.
6
Hemispheric asymmetries and brain size in mammals.哺乳动物的半球不对称性和大脑大小。
Commun Biol. 2023 May 15;6(1):521. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04894-z.
7
Acute and chronic stress alter behavioral laterality in dogs.急性和慢性压力会改变狗的行为侧化。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 11;13(1):4092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31213-7.
8
Hemispheric asymmetries in mental disorders: evidence from rodent studies.精神障碍的半球不对称性:来自啮齿动物研究的证据。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2023 Sep;130(9):1153-1165. doi: 10.1007/s00702-023-02610-z. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
9
Broadening the scope: Increasing phenotype diversity in laterality research.拓展研究范围:增加偏侧性研究中的表型多样性。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct 28;16:1048388. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1048388. eCollection 2022.
10
Does owner handedness influence paw preference in dogs?主人的惯用手会影响狗的前肢偏好吗?
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):425-433. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01673-x. Epub 2022 Sep 3.