Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan.
Mod Pathol. 2019 Jul;32(7):1023-1031. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0220-1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Endometrial endometrioid carcinoma is usually divided into three histological subgroups: grade 1 (G1), grade 2 (G2), and grade 3 (G3). Most cases of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma G1/2 have a favorable prognosis, although some can have unfavorable outcomes, especially when they involve elderly patients, with similarities to endometrioid carcinoma G3 and serous carcinoma. This retrospective study evaluated whether TP53 abnormalities in endometrial endometrioid carcinoma could be used to supplement the current grading system and improve its ability to predict clinical outcomes. Immunohistochemical expression of TP53 was analyzed using tissue microarrays from the surgically resected specimens of 475 patients with endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Weak or moderate expression was defined as TP53-normal expression, while absent or strongly positive expression was defined as TP53-aberrant expression. The endometrial endometrioid carcinomas had originally been diagnosed as G1 (69%), G2 (18%), and G3 (13%). Univariate analyses revealed that TP53-aberrant expression was associated with poor survival in G1 and G2 cases, but not G3 cases. In addition, age (<60 years vs. ≥60 years) was correlated with TP53-aberrant expression in G1 cases (3% vs. 16%, p = 0.001), but not in G2 or G3 cases. Based on immunohistochemical TP53 expression, the endometrial endometrioid carcinomas were reclassified using a prognostic grading system as high-grade (G1 or G2 with TP53- aberrant expression, and G3 with TP53-normal or -aberrant expression) or low-grade (G1 or G2 with TP53-normal expression). The multivariate analyses revealed that the prognostic grading system (using histological grade and TP53 expression) could independently predict poor progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.91, p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 3.62, p < 0.001). Therefore, combining immunohistochemical TP53 expression with the traditional histological grading system for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma may help improve its ability to accurately predict the patient's prognosis.
G1 级(grade 1,G1)、G2 级(grade 2,G2)和 G3 级(grade 3,G3)。大多数 G1/2 级子宫内膜样癌病例预后良好,尽管有些病例可能预后不佳,尤其是当涉及老年患者时,其与 G3 级子宫内膜样癌和浆液性癌相似。本回顾性研究评估了子宫内膜样癌中 TP53 异常是否可用于补充现行分级系统,并提高其预测临床结局的能力。使用来自 475 例子宫内膜样癌手术切除标本的组织微阵列分析 TP53 的免疫组织化学表达。弱或中度表达定义为 TP53 正常表达,而缺失或强阳性表达定义为 TP53 异常表达。这些子宫内膜样癌最初被诊断为 G1(69%)、G2(18%)和 G3(13%)。单因素分析显示,G1 和 G2 病例中 TP53 异常表达与生存不良相关,但 G3 病例中无此相关性。此外,年龄(<60 岁与≥60 岁)与 G1 病例中 TP53 异常表达相关(3%与 16%,p=0.001),但与 G2 或 G3 病例无关。基于免疫组织化学 TP53 表达,使用预后分级系统将子宫内膜样癌重新分类为高级别(G1 或 G2 伴 TP53 异常表达,G3 伴 TP53 正常或异常表达)或低级别(G1 或 G2 伴 TP53 正常表达)。多因素分析显示,预后分级系统(使用组织学分级和 TP53 表达)可独立预测不良无进展生存期(风险比:2.91,p<0.001)和总生存期(风险比:3.62,p<0.001)。因此,将免疫组织化学 TP53 表达与传统的子宫内膜样癌组织学分级系统相结合,可能有助于提高其准确预测患者预后的能力。