Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Chandler Hospital, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2018 Feb;31(2):358-364. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.131. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
Histologic subclassification of high-grade endometrial carcinomas can sometimes be a diagnostic challenge when based on histomorphology alone. Here we utilized immunohistochemical markers to determine the immunophenotype in histologically ambiguous high-grade endometrial carcinomas that were initially diagnosed as pure or mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, aiming to determine the utility of selected immunohistochemical panel in accurate classification of these distinct tumor types, while correlating these findings with the clinical outcome. A total of 43 high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially classified as pure high-grade endometrioid carcinoma (n=32), mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/serous carcinoma (n=9) and mixed high-grade endometrioid carcinoma/clear cell carcinoma (n=2) were retrospectively stained with a panel of immunostains, including antibodies for p53, p16, estrogen receptor, and mammaglobin. Clinical follow-up data were obtained, and stage-to-stage disease outcomes were compared for different tumor types. Based on aberrant staining for p53 and p16, 17/43 (40%) of the high-grade endometrial carcinoma cases initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma were re-classified as serous carcinoma. All 17 cases showed negative staining for mammaglobin, while estrogen receptor was positive in only 6 (35%) cases. The remaining 26 cases of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma showed wild-type staining for p53 in 25 (96%) cases, patchy staining for p16 in 20 (77%) cases, and were positive for mammaglobin and estrogen receptor in 8 (31%) and 19 (73%) cases, respectively, thus the initial diagnosis of high-grade endometrioid carcinoma was confirmed in these cases. In addition, the patients with re-classified serous carcinoma had advanced clinical stages at diagnosis and poorer overall survival on clinical follow-up compared to that of the remaining 26 high-grade endometrioid carcinoma cases. These results indicate that selected immunohistochemical panel, including p53, p16, and mammaglobin can be helpful in reaching accurate diagnosis in cases of histomorphologically ambiguous endometrial carcinomas, and can assist in providing guidance for appropriate therapeutic options for the patients.
当仅基于组织形态学进行高级别子宫内膜癌的组织学分类时,有时可能会具有诊断挑战性。在这里,我们利用免疫组织化学标志物来确定最初诊断为单纯或混合高级别子宫内膜样癌的组织学上存在疑问的高级别子宫内膜癌的免疫表型,旨在确定所选免疫组化标志物在准确分类这些不同肿瘤类型中的效用,同时将这些发现与临床结果相关联。总共 43 例最初分类为单纯高级别子宫内膜样癌的高级别子宫内膜癌病例(n=32)、混合高级别子宫内膜样癌/浆液性癌(n=9)和混合高级别子宫内膜样癌/透明细胞癌(n=2)被回顾性地用一组免疫标志物染色,包括针对 p53、p16、雌激素受体和乳球蛋白的抗体。获得了临床随访数据,并比较了不同肿瘤类型的分期到分期的疾病结局。基于 p53 和 p16 的异常染色,最初诊断为高级别子宫内膜样癌的 43 例高级别子宫内膜癌病例中有 17 例(40%)被重新分类为浆液性癌。所有 17 例均表现为乳球蛋白阴性染色,而雌激素受体阳性仅 6 例(35%)。其余 26 例高级别子宫内膜样癌病例中,25 例(96%)的 p53 野生型染色,20 例(77%)的 p16 局灶性染色,8 例(31%)和 19 例(73%)的乳球蛋白和雌激素受体阳性,因此确认了这些病例的高级别子宫内膜样癌的初始诊断。此外,重新分类为浆液性癌的患者在诊断时具有更晚期的临床分期,并且在临床随访中总体生存率较差,与其余 26 例高级别子宫内膜样癌病例相比。这些结果表明,包括 p53、p16 和乳球蛋白在内的选定免疫组化标志物可有助于在组织形态学上存在疑问的子宫内膜癌病例中做出准确诊断,并为患者提供适当的治疗选择提供指导。