Suppr超能文献

诺和笔II与低精蛋白锌胰岛素笔芯的临床使用经验。

Clinical experience with NovoPen II and insulin Protaphane HM Penfill.

作者信息

Kølendorf K, Beck-Nielsen H, Oxenbøll B

机构信息

Medical Department, Sundby Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1988;64 Suppl 3:14-6; discussion 21.

PMID:3074294
Abstract

The acceptance and convenience of an intermediate acting insulin Protaphane HM in Penfill were evaluated and compared with vials, and the safety of administration in Penfill was tested in 19 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. The design was a randomized, cross-over within-patient comparison with a run-in period of 4 weeks and two 12-week study periods. Safety was assessed by 7 point blood glucose profiles, HbA1c, total insulin dosage and frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes. Acceptance and convenience were evaluated by a questionnaire. None of the differences was statistically significant. Seventeen out of the 19 patients found NovoPen easier and quicker to use than conventional syringes and needles. The acceptance of a new pen device, NovoPen II, was tested in 56 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. Fifty-two out of 55 patients who completed a questionnaire preferred to continue with NovoPen II and 51 found it easy to preselect the dose. In conclusion, insulin Protaphane HM in Penfill can be safely administered with the NovoPen system.

摘要

对中效胰岛素Protaphane HM预填充笔芯的可接受性和便利性进行了评估,并与胰岛素瓶进行比较,且在19例胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中测试了预填充笔芯给药的安全性。研究设计为随机、患者内交叉对照,有4周的导入期和两个12周的研究期。通过7点血糖曲线、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、总胰岛素剂量和低血糖发作频率评估安全性。通过问卷调查评估可接受性和便利性。所有差异均无统计学意义。19例患者中有17例发现诺和笔比传统注射器和针头使用起来更容易、更快捷。在56例胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者中测试了新型笔式装置诺和笔II的可接受性。完成问卷调查的55例患者中有52例倾向于继续使用诺和笔II,51例发现预先选择剂量很容易。总之,预填充笔芯中的胰岛素Protaphane HM可通过诺和笔系统安全给药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验