• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

城市多压力源对三类河流生物组合的影响。

Effects of urban multi-stressors on three stream biotic assemblages.

机构信息

U.S. Geological Survey, Oregon Water Science Center, 2130 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR 97201, USA.

U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center, 934 Broadway, Suite 300, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1472-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.240. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.240
PMID:30743940
Abstract

During 2014, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) project assessed stream quality in 75 streams across an urban disturbance gradient within the Piedmont ecoregion of southeastern United States. Our objectives were to identify primary instream stressors affecting algal, macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages in wadeable streams. Biotic communities were surveyed once at each site, and various instream stressors were measured during a 4-week index period preceding the ecological sampling. The measured stressors included nutrients; contaminants in water, passive samplers, and sediment; instream habitat; and flow variability. All nine boosted regression tree models - three for each of algae, invertebrates, and fish - had cross-validation R (CV R) values of 0.41 or above, and an invertebrate model had the highest CV R of 0.65. At least one contaminant metric was important in every model, and minimum daytime dissolved oxygen (DO), nutrients, and flow alteration were important explanatory variables in many of the models. Physical habitat metrics such as sediment substrate were only moderately important. Flow alteration metrics were useful factors in eight of the nine models. Total phosphorus, acetanilide herbicides and flow (time since last peak) were important in all three algal models, whereas insecticide metrics (especially those representing fipronil and imidacloprid) were dominant in the invertebrate models. DO values below approximately 7 mg/L corresponded to a strong decrease in sensitive taxa or an increase in tolerant taxa. DO also showed strong interactions with other variables, particularly contaminants and sediment, where the combined effect of low DO and elevated contaminants increased the impact on the biota more than each variable individually. Contaminants and flow alteration were strongly correlated to urbanization, indicating the importance of urbanization to ecological stream condition in the region.

摘要

2014 年,美国地质调查局(USGS)国家水质评估(NAWQA)项目评估了美国东南部皮埃蒙特生态区的 75 条溪流,这些溪流位于城市干扰梯度范围内。我们的目标是确定影响可涉水溪流中藻类、大型无脊椎动物和鱼类群落的主要溪流胁迫因素。在每个地点进行了一次生物群落调查,并在生态采样前的 4 周索引期内测量了各种溪流胁迫因素。测量的胁迫因素包括营养物;水、被动采样器和沉积物中的污染物;溪流栖息地;以及流量变化。所有九个提升回归树模型-藻类、无脊椎动物和鱼类各三个-的交叉验证 R(CV R)值均为 0.41 或更高,并且无脊椎动物模型的 CV R 值最高,为 0.65。至少有一个污染物指标在每个模型中都很重要,最低日白天溶解氧(DO)、营养物和流量变化是许多模型中的重要解释变量。物理栖息地指标如沉积物基质仅具有中等重要性。流量变化指标在九个模型中的八个中是有用的因素。总磷、乙酰苯胺类除草剂和流量(上次峰值后的时间)在所有三个藻类模型中都很重要,而杀虫剂指标(尤其是那些代表氟虫腈和噻虫啉的指标)在无脊椎动物模型中占主导地位。DO 值低于约 7mg/L 对应于敏感类群的强烈减少或耐受类群的增加。DO 还与其他变量(尤其是污染物和沉积物)之间存在强烈的相互作用,其中低 DO 和升高的污染物的综合效应对生物群的影响大于每个变量单独的影响。污染物和流量变化与城市化强烈相关,表明城市化对该地区生态溪流状况的重要性。

相似文献

1
Effects of urban multi-stressors on three stream biotic assemblages.城市多压力源对三类河流生物组合的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1472-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.240. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
2
Multiple in-stream stressors degrade biological assemblages in five U.S. regions.多种流内压力源降低了美国五个地区的生物组合。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 15;800:149350. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149350. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
Legacy and Current-Use Contaminants in Sediments Alter Macroinvertebrate Communities in Southeastern US Streams.沉积物中的遗留和当前使用的污染物改变了美国东南部溪流中的大型底栖无脊椎动物群落。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 May;39(6):1219-1232. doi: 10.1002/etc.4705. Epub 2020 May 3.
4
Storm-event-transport of urban-use pesticides to streams likely impairs invertebrate assemblages.城市使用的杀虫剂随暴雨事件向溪流的输送可能会损害无脊椎动物群落。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Jun;188(6):345. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5215-5. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Mixed-chemical exposure and predicted effects potential in wadeable southeastern USA streams.美国东南部可涉水溪流中的混合化学物质暴露和潜在影响预测。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 10;655:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.186. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
6
Water quality deterioration remains a major stressor for macroinvertebrate, diatom and fish communities in German rivers.水质恶化仍然是德国河流中大型无脊椎动物、硅藻和鱼类群落的主要压力源。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:167994. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167994. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
7
Projected urban growth in the southeastern USA puts small streams at risk.美国东南部预计的城市增长将使小溪面临风险。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0222714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222714. eCollection 2019.
8
Examining the influence of human stressors on benthic algae, macroinvertebrate, and fish assemblages in Mediterranean streams of Chile.探讨人类压力源对智利地中海溪流底栖藻类、大型无脊椎动物和鱼类群落的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Oct 10;686:26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.277. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
Identifying congruence in stream assemblage thresholds in response to nutrient and sediment gradients for limit setting.为了确定限制因素,识别在养分和沉积物梯度下河流综合阈值响应中的一致性。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Mar;27(2):469-484. doi: 10.1002/eap.1457. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
10
The influence of multiple chemical and non-chemical stressors on benthic communities in a mid-west agricultural stream.多种化学和非化学应激源对中西部农业溪流底栖生物群落的影响。
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2017 Aug 24;52(10):1008-1021. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2017.1328947. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Modeling Reveals Elevated Conductivity Relative to Background Levels in Freshwater Tributaries within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA.预测模型显示,美国切萨皮克湾流域内淡水支流的电导率相对于背景水平有所升高。
ACS ES T Water. 2024 Oct 30;4(11):4978-4989. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.4c00589. eCollection 2024 Nov 8.
2
Integrating social, climate and environmental changes to confront accelerating global aging.将社会、气候和环境变化相结合,应对全球加速老龄化。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):2838. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20346-7.
3
Identifying Key Stressors Driving Biological Impairment in Freshwater Streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, USA.
识别导致美国切萨皮克湾流域淡水溪流生物受损的关键压力源。
Environ Manage. 2022 Dec;70(6):926-949. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01723-7. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Common insecticide disrupts aquatic communities: A mesocosm-to-field ecological risk assessment of fipronil and its degradates in U.S. streams.常见杀虫剂扰乱水生群落:美国溪流中氟虫腈及其降解产物从中尺度生态系统到野外的生态风险评估
Sci Adv. 2020 Oct 23;6(43). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc1299. Print 2020 Oct.
5
Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey.优先对美国地质调查局进行密集监测和评估的河流流域。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jun 27;192(7):458. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08403-1.
6
Projected urban growth in the southeastern USA puts small streams at risk.美国东南部预计的城市增长将使小溪面临风险。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0222714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222714. eCollection 2019.