Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019 Feb 12;14(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13722-019-0134-8.
Effective medications for treating alcohol use disorders (AUD) are available but underutilized. Multiple barriers to their provision have been identified, and optimal strategies for addressing and overcoming barriers to use of medications for AUD treatment remain elusive. We conducted a structured review of published care delivery and implementation studies evaluating interventions that aimed to increase medication treatment for patients with AUD to identify interventions and component strategies that were most effective.
We reviewed literature through May 2018 and used networking to identify intervention studies with AUD medication receipt reported as a primary or secondary outcome. Studies were identified as care delivery studies, characterized by patient-level recruitment and willingness to be randomized to candidate treatment options, and implementation studies, characterized by inclusion of all patients treated at sites involved in the study. Each identified study was independently coded by two investigators for strategies used, guided by a published taxonomy of implementation strategies. All authors reviewed coding discrepancies and revised codes based on consensus. After reaching internal consensus, we solicited feedback from lead investigators on studies to code additional strategies. We reviewed implementation strategies used across studies to assess their relationship with medication receipt, as well as alcohol use outcomes, as available.
Nine studies were identified: four RCTs of care delivery interventions, four quasi-experimental evaluations of large-scale implementation interventions, and one quasi-experimental evaluation of a targeted single-site implementation intervention. Implementation strategies used were variable across studies; no strategy was universally used. Effects of the interventions on receipt of AUD pharmacotherapy and alcohol use outcomes also varied. Three of four care delivery interventions resulted in increased receipt of AUD medications, but only one of these three improved alcohol use outcomes. One large-scale and one single-site implementation intervention were associated with increased AUD medication receipt, and these studies did not assess alcohol use outcomes. Patterns of implementation strategies did not clearly distinguish studies that successfully increased use of pharmacotherapy versus those that did not.
Our review did not reveal strategies most effective for implementing AUD medications. Interventions designed to overcome identified barriers may have missed the mark, or differences in the intensity or targets of strategies may matter more than differences in strategies. Further research is needed to understand effective implementation methods and to better understand patient-level perspective, preferences and barriers to receipt of medications.
有效的治疗酒精使用障碍(AUD)的药物是可用的,但未被充分利用。已经确定了提供这些药物的多种障碍,并且仍然难以找到解决和克服 AUD 治疗药物使用障碍的最佳策略。我们对已发表的护理提供和实施研究进行了结构化审查,评估了旨在增加 AUD 患者药物治疗的干预措施,以确定最有效的干预措施和组成策略。
我们通过 2018 年 5 月对文献进行了回顾,并通过网络联系确定了 AUD 药物接受率作为主要或次要结果报告的干预研究。研究被确定为护理提供研究,其特征是患者层面的招募和愿意随机分配到候选治疗方案,以及实施研究,其特征是包括参与研究的所有患者。两位研究者独立对研究中使用的策略进行了编码,这些策略由已发表的实施策略分类法指导。所有作者都审查了编码差异,并根据共识进行了修订。在达成内部共识后,我们征求了编码研究的主要研究者的反馈意见,以添加其他策略。我们审查了跨研究使用的实施策略,以评估它们与药物接受度以及可用的酒精使用结果之间的关系。
确定了九项研究:四项 RCT 对护理提供干预措施进行了评估,四项对大规模实施干预措施的准实验评估,以及一项对针对性单站点实施干预措施的准实验评估。研究中使用的实施策略各不相同;没有一种策略是普遍使用的。干预措施对 AUD 药物治疗的接受程度和酒精使用结果的影响也各不相同。四项护理提供干预措施中的三项导致 AUD 药物治疗的接受度增加,但其中三项仅改善了酒精使用结果。一项大规模和一项单站点实施干预措施与 AUD 药物治疗的接受度增加有关,而这些研究并未评估酒精使用结果。实施策略的模式并没有清楚地区分那些成功增加药物治疗使用率的研究与那些没有的研究。
我们的综述没有发现实施 AUD 药物治疗最有效的策略。旨在克服已确定障碍的干预措施可能没有达到目标,或者策略的强度或目标的差异可能比策略的差异更重要。需要进一步研究以了解有效的实施方法,并更好地了解患者层面的观点、对药物治疗的接受程度和障碍。