Suppr超能文献

“黄化脆果病”恢复的两个葡萄品种中的差异基因表达。

Differential gene expression in two grapevine cultivars recovered from "flavescence dorée".

机构信息

Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante (IPSP), C.N.R. Strada delle Cacce, 73, 10135 Torino, Italy; Istituto di Bioscienze e BioRisorse (IBBR), C.N.R. Corso Calatafimi 414, 90129 Palermo, Italy.

Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante (IPSP), C.N.R. Strada delle Cacce, 73, 10135 Torino, Italy; Leibniz Institute-DSMZ, Inhoffenstrasse 7b, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.

出版信息

Microbiol Res. 2019 Mar;220:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.12.005. Epub 2018 Dec 28.

Abstract

The biological bases of recovery of two grapevine cultivars, Nebbiolo and Barbera, showing different susceptibility and recovery ability to "flavescence dorée" (FD) phytoplasma infection were investigated. The expression over one vegetative season, in FD-recovered and healthy grapevines, of 18 genes involved in defence, hydrogen peroxide and hormone production was verified at two time points. Difference (Δ) between the relative expressions of August and July were calculated for each target gene of both cultivars. The significance of differences among groups assessed by univariate and multivariate statistical methods, and sPLS-DA analyses of the Δ gene expression values, showed that control and recovered grapevines of both cultivars were clearly separated. The Barbera-specific deregulation of defence genes supports a stronger response of this variety, within a general frame of interactions among HO, jasmonate and ethylene metabolisms, common to both varieties. This may strengthen the hypothesis that FD-recovered Barbera grapevines modulate transcription of their genes to cope with potential damages associated to the alteration of their oxidative status. Nebbiolo variety would fit into this picture, although with a less intense response, in line with its lower degree of susceptibility and recovery incidence to FD, compared to Barbera. The results evidenced a scenario where plant response to phytoplasma infection is highly affected by climatic and edaphic conditions. Nevertheless, even after several years from the original FD infection, it was still possible to distinguish, at molecular level, control and recovered grapevines of both cultivars by analyzing their overall-season response, rather than that of a single time point.

摘要

本研究调查了对“黄化病”(FD)植原体感染表现出不同易感性和恢复能力的两个葡萄品种 Nebbiolo 和 Barbera 的生物恢复基础。在 FD 恢复和健康葡萄植株中,18 个与防御、过氧化氢和激素产生相关的基因在一个生育季节中的表达情况,在两个时间点进行了验证。对两个品种的每个靶基因,计算了 8 月和 7 月相对表达量之间的差异(Δ)。通过单变量和多变量统计方法以及 sPLS-DA 对 Δ基因表达值的分析,评估了组间差异的显著性,结果表明,两个品种的对照和恢复葡萄植株明显分开。该品种防御基因的特异性失调支持了这种品种更强的反应,这是在 HO、茉莉酸和乙烯代谢之间相互作用的一般框架内,两种品种都存在这种相互作用。这可能加强了这样的假设,即 FD 恢复的 Barbera 葡萄植株会调节其基因的转录,以应对与氧化状态改变相关的潜在损害。 Nebbiolo 品种也符合这种情况,尽管其对 FD 的易感性和恢复发生率较低,因此反应较弱。研究结果表明,植物对植原体感染的反应受气候和土壤条件的高度影响。然而,即使在 FD 最初感染后的几年,通过分析其整个季节的反应,而不是单一时间点的反应,仍然可以在分子水平上区分两个品种的对照和恢复葡萄植株。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验