• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉注射右旋酮洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚治疗急诊科非创伤性肌肉骨骼疼痛的随机临床试验。

Intravenous dexketoprofen versus paracetamol in non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Gaziantep 25 Aralik State Hospital, Emergency Service, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Pamukkale University, Medical Faculty, Department of Emergency Medicine, 20070 Denizli, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2136-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.040. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.040
PMID:30744914
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although acute musculoskeletal pain has a wide range of causes from tendinitis, muscle spasm, to bone and joint injuries, it is a frequent occurrence in emergency services. Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) are common used in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study sets out to compare the effectiveness of intravenous dexketoprofen and paracetamol in musculoskeletal pain relief.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled study was carried out in a university emergency room. The participating patients were randomized into two groups to receive either 50 mg of dexketoprofen or 1000 mg of paracetamol intravenously by rapid infusion in 150 ml of normal saline. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scala (NRS) was employed for pain measurement at baseline, after 15, after 30 and after 60 mins.

RESULTS

200 patients were included in the study, excluding 7342 of them. The mean age of the patients was calculated as 32,6. Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention decreases NRS pain scores over time. When compared to all pain locations, the NRS pain score of the patients was found to be statistically more effective in dexketoprofen than in paracetamol (p = 0.001). Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention reduces pain VAS scores over time. When the VAS pain score of the patients was compared to all pain locations, dexketoprofen was found to be statistically more effective than paracetamol (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intravenous dexketoprofen seemed to achieve superior analgesia to intravenous paracetamol when compared with all pain locations in patients with non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain.

摘要

简介

急性肌肉骨骼疼痛的病因广泛,从肌腱炎、肌肉痉挛到骨和关节损伤都有,但它在急诊服务中很常见。扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎镇痛药(NSAID)常用于治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛。本研究旨在比较静脉注射右旋酮洛芬和扑热息痛在缓解肌肉骨骼疼痛方面的效果。

方法

这是一项在大学急诊室进行的前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究。将参与的患者随机分为两组,分别静脉注射 50mg 右旋酮洛芬或 1000mg 扑热息痛,用 150ml 生理盐水快速输注。在基线、15 分钟、30 分钟和 60 分钟时使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和数字评分量表(NRS)进行疼痛测量。

结果

该研究纳入了 200 名患者,排除了其中的 7342 名患者。患者的平均年龄计算为 32.6 岁。扑热息痛和右旋酮洛芬干预均随时间降低 NRS 疼痛评分。与所有疼痛部位相比,右旋酮洛芬在 NRS 疼痛评分上比扑热息痛更有效(p=0.001)。扑热息痛和右旋酮洛芬干预均随时间降低 VAS 疼痛评分。与所有疼痛部位相比,右旋酮洛芬在 VAS 疼痛评分上比扑热息痛更有效(p=0.001)。

结论

与非创伤性肌肉骨骼疼痛的所有疼痛部位相比,静脉注射右旋酮洛芬似乎比静脉注射扑热息痛更能达到镇痛效果。

相似文献

1
Intravenous dexketoprofen versus paracetamol in non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial.静脉注射右旋酮洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚治疗急诊科非创伤性肌肉骨骼疼痛的随机临床试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2136-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.040. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
2
Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen in acute musculoskeletal trauma in the emergency department: A randomised clinical trial.静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚与右旋酮洛芬在急诊科急性肌肉骨骼创伤中的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 May;37(5):902-908. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
3
Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: a randomised clinical trial.急诊科急性偏头痛发作时静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚与右酮洛芬的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Mar;31(3):182-5. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203044. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
4
Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen versus morphine in acute mechanical low back pain in the emergency department: a randomised double-blind controlled trial.急诊科急性机械性下背痛患者中静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚、右酮洛芬与吗啡的疗效比较:一项随机双盲对照试验
Emerg Med J. 2014 Mar;31(3):177-81. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201670. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
5
Comparison of IV dexketoprofen trometamol, fentanyl, and paracetamol in the treatment of renal colic in the ED: A randomized controlled trial.静脉注射右酮洛芬氨丁三醇、芬太尼和对乙酰氨基酚治疗急诊科肾绞痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):571-576. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Intravenous metoclopramide versus dexketoprofen trometamol versus metoclopramide+ dexketoprofen trometamol in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.静脉注射甲氧氯普胺与右酮洛芬氨丁三醇与甲氧氯普胺+右酮洛芬氨丁三醇在急诊科急性偏头痛发作中的比较:一项随机双盲对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Nov;38(11):2254-2258. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
[Efficacy of intravenous dexketoprofen trometamol compared to intravenous paracetamol for postoperative pain management after day-case operative hysteroscopy: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study].日间手术宫腔镜检查术后疼痛管理中静脉注射右酮洛芬氨丁三醇与静脉注射对乙酰氨基酚的疗效比较:随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
Agri. 2014;26(1):15-22. doi: 10.5505/agri.2014.85047.
8
Pain treatment in patients with acute pancreatitis: A randomized controlled trial.急性胰腺炎患者的疼痛治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;27(2):192-6. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.150398.
9
Intradermal mesotherapy versus systemic therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: A prospective randomized study.皮内间充质疗法与全身治疗在治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛中的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;37(11):2061-2065. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.042. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
10
Tramadol/dexketoprofen (TRAM/DKP) compared with tramadol/paracetamol in moderate to severe acute pain: results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active-controlled, parallel group trial in the impacted third molar extraction pain model (DAVID study).曲马多/右旋酮洛芬(TRAM/DKP)与曲马多/对乙酰氨基酚在中重度急性疼痛中的比较:一项在第三磨牙阻生拔牙疼痛模型中进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂和阳性药物对照、平行组试验(DAVID 研究)的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e023715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023715.