Gaziantep 25 Aralik State Hospital, Emergency Service, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Pamukkale University, Medical Faculty, Department of Emergency Medicine, 20070 Denizli, Turkey.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;37(12):2136-2142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.01.040. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
Although acute musculoskeletal pain has a wide range of causes from tendinitis, muscle spasm, to bone and joint injuries, it is a frequent occurrence in emergency services. Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics (NSAID) are common used in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. This study sets out to compare the effectiveness of intravenous dexketoprofen and paracetamol in musculoskeletal pain relief.
This prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled study was carried out in a university emergency room. The participating patients were randomized into two groups to receive either 50 mg of dexketoprofen or 1000 mg of paracetamol intravenously by rapid infusion in 150 ml of normal saline. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scala (NRS) was employed for pain measurement at baseline, after 15, after 30 and after 60 mins.
200 patients were included in the study, excluding 7342 of them. The mean age of the patients was calculated as 32,6. Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention decreases NRS pain scores over time. When compared to all pain locations, the NRS pain score of the patients was found to be statistically more effective in dexketoprofen than in paracetamol (p = 0.001). Paracetamol and dexketoprofen intervention reduces pain VAS scores over time. When the VAS pain score of the patients was compared to all pain locations, dexketoprofen was found to be statistically more effective than paracetamol (p = 0.001).
Intravenous dexketoprofen seemed to achieve superior analgesia to intravenous paracetamol when compared with all pain locations in patients with non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain.
急性肌肉骨骼疼痛的病因广泛,从肌腱炎、肌肉痉挛到骨和关节损伤都有,但它在急诊服务中很常见。扑热息痛和非甾体抗炎镇痛药(NSAID)常用于治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛。本研究旨在比较静脉注射右旋酮洛芬和扑热息痛在缓解肌肉骨骼疼痛方面的效果。
这是一项在大学急诊室进行的前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究。将参与的患者随机分为两组,分别静脉注射 50mg 右旋酮洛芬或 1000mg 扑热息痛,用 150ml 生理盐水快速输注。在基线、15 分钟、30 分钟和 60 分钟时使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和数字评分量表(NRS)进行疼痛测量。
该研究纳入了 200 名患者,排除了其中的 7342 名患者。患者的平均年龄计算为 32.6 岁。扑热息痛和右旋酮洛芬干预均随时间降低 NRS 疼痛评分。与所有疼痛部位相比,右旋酮洛芬在 NRS 疼痛评分上比扑热息痛更有效(p=0.001)。扑热息痛和右旋酮洛芬干预均随时间降低 VAS 疼痛评分。与所有疼痛部位相比,右旋酮洛芬在 VAS 疼痛评分上比扑热息痛更有效(p=0.001)。
与非创伤性肌肉骨骼疼痛的所有疼痛部位相比,静脉注射右旋酮洛芬似乎比静脉注射扑热息痛更能达到镇痛效果。