Department of Oncology, Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Pathology, Sarcoma Centre of Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus, Denmark.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Apr;31(4):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
To investigate the prognostic value of combining inflammatory biomarkers in a prognostic index (Aarhus composite biomarker score: ACBS), adjusted for known confounders, including comorbidity, in patients with metastatic sarcoma.
All patients diagnosed with metastatic sarcoma from 1993 until 2008 were extracted from the Aarhus sarcoma database. The levels of serum albumin, C-reactive protein, serum sodium, haemoglobin, neutrophils and lymphocytes were collected. ACBS as well as the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and a combined score of GPS and NLR known as CNG were calculated. The prognostic importance of the biomarkers on disease-specific mortality was analysed. Adjustments were made for age, comorbidity, histological type and site of metastasis using the Cox proportional hazard model. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was used to evaluate whether the ACBS adds prognostic information to already known prognostic factors. The data were validated using the bootstrapping method.
In total, 265 patients with metastatic sarcoma were included. The 2-year disease-specific mortality was 74% (95% confidence interval 68-80) and 79% (95% confidence interval 68-88) for soft-tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma, respectively. Comorbidity was present in 21% of soft-tissue sarcoma patients and 13% of the bone sarcoma patients. All six biomarkers were independent prognostic factors. The various scoring systems (NLR, GPS, CNG and ACBS) combining more than one biomarker were also prognostic for disease-specific mortality.
The biomarker scoring systems are independent prognostic factors for adult patients with metastatic sarcoma. However, a modified ACBS was superior to all the other scoring systems in predicting outcome.
探讨炎症生物标志物联合预后指数(奥胡斯综合生物标志物评分:ACBS)在调整已知混杂因素(包括合并症)后对转移性肉瘤患者的预后价值。
从奥胡斯肉瘤数据库中提取 1993 年至 2008 年间所有诊断为转移性肉瘤的患者。收集血清白蛋白、C 反应蛋白、血清钠、血红蛋白、中性粒细胞和淋巴细胞水平。计算 ACBS 以及中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、格拉斯哥预后评分(GPS)和称为 CNG 的 GPS 和 NLR 的联合评分。分析生物标志物对疾病特异性死亡率的预后重要性。使用 Cox 比例风险模型对年龄、合并症、组织学类型和转移部位进行调整。使用 Harrell 的一致性指数(C 指数)评估 ACBS 是否为已知预后因素提供了更多的预后信息。使用自举法验证数据。
共纳入 265 例转移性肉瘤患者。软组织肉瘤和骨肉瘤的 2 年疾病特异性死亡率分别为 74%(95%置信区间 68-80)和 79%(95%置信区间 68-88)。软组织肉瘤患者中有 21%合并合并症,骨肉瘤患者中有 13%合并合并症。所有 6 种生物标志物均为独立的预后因素。结合两种以上生物标志物的各种评分系统(NLR、GPS、CNG 和 ACBS)也是疾病特异性死亡率的预后因素。
生物标志物评分系统是成人转移性肉瘤患者的独立预后因素。然而,改良的 ACBS 在预测预后方面优于所有其他评分系统。