Saphenous Vein Graft Sacrifice Following Native Vessel PCI is Safe and Associated with Favourable Longer-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Competitive flow from saphenous vein grafts (SVG) that remain patent following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the native vessel may compromise durability of the reconstructed vessel. SVG sacrifice has been advocated, but the safety and longer-term outcomes of this are unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all post-bypass patients who following successful PCI of the native vessel underwent attempted saphenous vein graft (SVG) closure between January 2014 and July 2018 in two institutions. The co-primary end-points of interest were safety and target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel recurrent myocardial infarction or clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (TLR).

RESULTS

Of the 33 consecutive patients included, the reconstructed native vessel was a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in 93.9% of patients (n = 31) with a mean J-CTO score of 3.2 (±1.1) SVG closure was successful in 97.0% of patients (n = 32). Amplatzer Vascular Plugs (AVP; Abbott Vascular) were used in all patients with most grafts closed by a single plug (72.7%). The average procedure time was 20.1 min with evidence of a short learning curve. Over a mean follow up of 602 (±393) days from the date of SVG closure, the incidence of TLF was 9.1% (n = 3). There was an additional case of targe vessel failure (TVF) due to progression of native vessel disease not treated at the index procedure. SVG closure resulted in only 1 episode of "slow flow" that was transient and self-resolving. There were no other associated peri-procedural or in-hospital complications.

CONCLUSION

Following native vessel PCI, SVG sacrifice may be considered to terminate the potentially deleterious effects of residual competitive flow. In selected cases, this approach achieves high success rate and favourable longer-term outcomes.