Antebi-Gruszka Nadav, Schrimshaw Eric W
Mental Health Counseling, Department of Psychology, City College of New York, CUNY, New York, NY 10031, USA.
Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2018 Jun;5(2):156-168. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000292.
Substantial evidence exists about the negative role of internalized homonegativity on the health and well-being of lesbian women and gay men. However, existing measures of internalized homonegativity assume a gay or lesbian sexual identity ("I wish I wasn't gay") and therefore may be inappropriate for non-gay identified individuals, including bisexual people. Therefore, we developed and tested the psychometric properties of the Negative Attitudes Towards Same-Sex Behavior Inventory (NATSBI) which was designed to assess one's negative attitudes towards their same-sex behavior, regardless of their self-identification. Using data from an ethnically-diverse sample of 203 non-gay identified behaviorally-bisexual men, we examined the factor structure, construct validity, and reliability of the NATSBI. A factor analysis of the NATSBI yielded three subscales: (1) personal homonegativity, (2) disclosure discomfort, and (3) privacy preference, with very good internal consistency reliability estimates for both subscales (α = .90, α = .89, and α = .84, respectively). The reliability was also strong within each of various demographic subgroups within the sample (e.g., race/ethnicity, age, sexual identity). The correlations of the NATSBI with various constructs (e.g., self-esteem, depression, emotional support) provided evidence of the concurrent (i.e., construct) validity of the NATSBI. These findings on the reliability and validity of the NATSBI suggest that it is possible to assess internalized homonegativity based on sexual behavior rather than assuming specific sexual identity labels. As such, we propose the NATSBI for use in studies that focus on bisexual and other non-gay-identified MSM, as well as studies that anticipate including non-gay-identified MSM.
大量证据表明内化的同性恋厌恶对女同性恋者和男同性恋者的健康和幸福具有负面影响。然而,现有的内化同性恋厌恶测量方法假定了同性恋或双性恋的性身份(“我希望我不是同性恋”),因此可能不适用于未被认定为同性恋的个体,包括双性恋者。因此,我们开发并测试了《对同性行为的负面态度量表》(NATSBI)的心理测量特性,该量表旨在评估一个人对自己同性行为的负面态度,无论其自我认同如何。我们使用来自203名行为双性恋男性的种族多样化样本的数据,检验了NATSBI的因子结构、结构效度和信度。对NATSBI的因子分析产生了三个分量表:(1)个人同性恋厌恶,(2)披露不适,(3)隐私偏好,两个分量表的内部一致性信度估计都非常好(分别为α = 0.90、α = 0.89和α = 0.84)。在样本中的各个不同人口亚组(如种族/族裔、年龄、性身份)中,信度也很强。NATSBI与各种构念(如自尊、抑郁、情感支持)的相关性为NATSBI的同时效度(即结构效度)提供了证据。这些关于NATSBI信度和效度的研究结果表明,有可能根据性行为而非假定特定的性身份标签来评估内化的同性恋厌恶。因此,我们建议将NATSBI用于关注双性恋和其他未被认定为同性恋的男男性行为者的研究,以及预期纳入未被认定为同性恋的男男性行为者的研究。