Suppr超能文献

卡培他滨治疗转移性乳腺癌患者治疗前 DPYD 基因分型的临床应用。

Clinical implementation of pre-treatment DPYD genotyping in capecitabine-treated metastatic breast cancer patients.

机构信息

Breast Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's Biomedical Centre, 4th Floor, Bermondsey Wing, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.

Purine Research Laboratory, Viapath, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(2):511-517. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05144-9. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients with DPYD genetic variants linked to loss of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity are at risk of severe capecitabine-associated toxicities. However, prospective DPYD genotyping has not yet been implemented in routine clinical practice. Following a previous internal review in which two patients underwent lengthy hospitalisations whilst receiving capecitabine, and were subsequently found to be DPD deficient, we initiated routine DPYD genotyping prior to starting capecitabine. This study evaluates the clinical application of routine DPYD screening at a large cancer centre in London.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records for consecutive patients with mBC who underwent DPYD genotyping before commencing capecitabine between December 2014 and December 2017. Patients were tested for four DPYD variants associated with reduced DPD activity.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients underwent DPYD testing. Five (8.4%) patients were found to carry DPYD genetic polymorphisms associated with reduced DPD activity; of these, two received dose-reduced capecitabine. Of the 61 patients with DPYD wild-type, 14 (23%) experienced grade 3 toxicities which involved palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (65%), and gastrointestinal toxicities (35%); no patient was hospitalised due to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective DPYD genotyping can be successfully implemented in routine clinical practice and can reduce the risk of severe fluoropyrimidine toxicities.

摘要

目的

与二氢嘧啶脱氢酶(DPD)活性丧失相关的 DPYD 基因变异的转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者有发生严重卡培他滨相关毒性的风险。然而,前瞻性 DPYD 基因分型尚未在常规临床实践中实施。在先前的内部审查中,两名患者在接受卡培他滨治疗时经历了长时间的住院治疗,随后发现 DPD 缺乏,我们在开始卡培他滨治疗前开始常规 DPYD 基因分型。本研究评估了在伦敦一家大型癌症中心常规 DPYD 筛查的临床应用。

方法

我们回顾了 2014 年 12 月至 2017 年 12 月期间连续接受 mBC 且在开始卡培他滨治疗前进行 DPYD 基因分型的患者的病历。对四名与降低 DPD 活性相关的 DPYD 变异进行了检测。

结果

66 名患者接受了 DPYD 检测。5 名(8.4%)患者携带与降低 DPD 活性相关的 DPYD 基因多态性;其中 2 名接受了剂量减少的卡培他滨。在 61 名 DPYD 野生型患者中,14 名(23%)出现 3 级毒性,包括掌跖红斑感觉异常(65%)和胃肠道毒性(35%);没有因毒性而住院的患者。

结论

前瞻性 DPYD 基因分型可成功应用于常规临床实践,降低氟嘧啶类药物严重毒性的风险。

相似文献

1
Clinical implementation of pre-treatment DPYD genotyping in capecitabine-treated metastatic breast cancer patients.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(2):511-517. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05144-9. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
2
DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis.
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1459-1467. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30686-7. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
3
Patients homozygous for DPYD c.1129-5923C>G/haplotype B3 have partial DPD deficiency and require a dose reduction when treated with fluoropyrimidines.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;78(4):875-80. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3137-0. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
New advances in DPYD genotype and risk of severe toxicity under capecitabine.
PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0175998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175998. eCollection 2017.
7
Evaluation of clinical implementation of prospective DPYD genotyping in 5-fluorouracil- or capecitabine-treated patients.
Pharmacogenomics. 2016 May;17(7):721-9. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2016-0013. Epub 2016 May 16.
8
Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction of DPYD and fluoropyrimidines.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Apr;28(4):508-517. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0540-0. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

2
A call for reporting of tumor-specific outcomes in studies of DPYD genotyping.
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Aug;17(8):e70003. doi: 10.1111/cts.70003.
4
Defining Clinical Utility of Germline Indicators of Toxicity Risk: A Perspective.
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;40(16):1721-1731. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02209. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
5
Ethnic Diversity of DPD Activity and the Gene: Review of the Literature.
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2021 Dec 9;14:1603-1617. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S337147. eCollection 2021.
6
7
Exome sequencing in BRCA1-2 candidate familias: the contribution of other cancer susceptibility genes.
Front Oncol. 2021 May 7;11:649435. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.649435. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
A cost analysis of upfront DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy.
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;107:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
2
DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation of fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with cancer: a prospective safety analysis.
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1459-1467. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30686-7. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
3
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
Prospective DPYD genotyping to reduce the risk of fluoropyrimidine-induced severe toxicity: Ready for prime time.
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Feb;54:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验