Carvalhaes Jeiel G, Cordeiro-Estrela Pedro, Hohl Leandro S L, Vilela Roberto V, D'Andrea Paulo S, Rocha-Barbosa Oscar
Laboratório de Biologia e Parasitologia de Mamíferos Silvestres Reservatórios, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Programa de Pós-graduação Stricto sensu em Biodiversidade e Saúde, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
J Morphol. 2019 Mar;280(3):436-445. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20955.
The echimyid rodents of the genus Thrichomys vary considerably in their behavior and feeding ecology, reflecting their occurrence in environments as different as the Caatinga, Cerrado, Pantanal, and Chaco biomes. While the genus was originally classified as monospecific, a number of Thrichomys species have been recognized in recent decades, based on morphometric, cytogenetic, and molecular analyses. While Thrichomys is well studied, the variation found in its cranial morphology is poorly understood, given the taxonomic and ecological complexities of the genus. Using a geometric morphometric approach, we characterized the differences found in the cranial morphology of four Thrichomys taxonomic units, including three established species, Thrichomys apereoides, Thrichomys fosteri, and Thrichomys laurentius, and one operational taxonomic unit (OTU), Thrichomys aff. laurentius. No significant differences were found among these units in cranium size, but significant variation was found in skull shape. The Procrustes distances provided a quantification of the differences in the shape of the skull, with the largest distances being found between T. aff. laurentius and T. fosteri in the dorsal view, and between T. aff. laurentius and T. apereoides in the ventral view. A Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA) with cross-validation determined that the pairings with the highest correct classification were T. aff. laurentius vs. T. apereoides and T. aff. laurentius vs. T. fosteri, in both views. The principal variation in skull shape was found in the posterior region and the zygomatic arch, which may be related to differences in diet.
绒毛鼠属(Thrichomys)的刺豚鼠在行为和觅食生态方面差异很大,这反映出它们出现在不同的环境中,如卡廷加、塞拉多、潘塔纳尔和查科生物群落。虽然该属最初被归类为单种属,但近几十年来,基于形态测量、细胞遗传学和分子分析,已识别出多个绒毛鼠物种。尽管对绒毛鼠的研究较为充分,但鉴于该属在分类学和生态学上的复杂性,其颅骨形态的变异仍未得到很好的理解。我们采用几何形态测量方法,对四个绒毛鼠分类单元的颅骨形态差异进行了表征,其中包括三个已确定的物种,即阿氏绒毛鼠(Thrichomys apereoides)、福氏绒毛鼠(Thrichomys fosteri)和劳氏绒毛鼠(Thrichomys laurentius),以及一个操作分类单元(OTU),即劳氏绒毛鼠近似种(Thrichomys aff. laurentius)。这些单元在颅骨大小上未发现显著差异,但在头骨形状上发现了显著变异。普氏距离量化了头骨形状的差异,在背视图中,劳氏绒毛鼠近似种与福氏绒毛鼠之间的距离最大;在腹视图中,劳氏绒毛鼠近似种与阿氏绒毛鼠之间的距离最大。交叉验证的判别函数分析(DFA)确定,在两种视图中,正确分类率最高的配对是劳氏绒毛鼠近似种与阿氏绒毛鼠以及劳氏绒毛鼠近似种与福氏绒毛鼠。头骨形状的主要变异出现在后部区域和颧弓,这可能与饮食差异有关。