Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1074-1078. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15815. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
The American College of Surgeons Coalition for Quality in Geriatric Surgery is a multidisciplinary stakeholder group that aims to systematically improve the surgical care of older adults by establishing a verifiable quality improvement program with standards based on best evidence. Prior work confirmed the validity of a preliminary set of 308 standards to improve the quality of geriatric surgery, but concerns exist as to whether the standards are feasible for hospitals to implement.
Our aim was to utilize data gained from a multi-institutional survey and interview to improve the scalability and generalizability of a geriatric quality improvement program.
Using a survey followed by a targeted debrief interview, 15 hospitals gathered an interdisciplinary panel to answer whether each standard was already in place at their institution, and if not, the perceived difficulty of implementation according to a five-point Likert scale (from 1 [very easy] to 5 [very difficult]). The standards were then placed into categories according to the hospital responses. Standards were designated "duplicative" if 11 or more hospitals reported baseline implementation, "prohibitively difficult" if 6 or more hospitals rated the standard as such, and "high potential" if they were neither duplicative nor difficult. A targeted debrief interview was then conducted with each participating hospital.
Fifteen participating hospitals evaluated the feasibility of 108 standards and found 28 (26%) duplicative, 35 (32%) too difficult, and 45 (42%) high potential. Of the 108 standards, 49 (45%) were selected for the next iteration of standards, and 59 were removed. Among the standards that were removed, the majority (64%) were rated duplicative and/or difficult.
A multi-institutional survey and interview successfully identified care standards that were redundant or too difficult to implement on the hospital level. These data will help improve the generalizability and scalability of the program while maintaining the overall goal of improving care. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1074-1078, 2019.
美国外科医师学会老年外科质量联盟是一个多学科利益相关者团体,旨在通过建立一个基于最佳证据的可验证质量改进计划,系统地改善老年人的外科护理。先前的工作证实了一套初步的 308 项标准的有效性,以提高老年手术的质量,但人们担心这些标准是否可行,医院是否能够实施。
我们的目的是利用多机构调查和访谈获得的数据,提高老年外科质量改进计划的可扩展性和普遍性。
使用调查,然后进行有针对性的汇报访谈,15 家医院召集一个跨学科小组,回答每个标准在其机构中是否已经到位,如果没有,根据五点李克特量表(从 1 [非常容易]到 5 [非常困难]),实施的难度。然后根据医院的反应将标准分类。如果 11 家或更多医院报告了基线实施情况,则将标准指定为“重复”;如果 6 家或更多医院将标准评为如此,则将标准指定为“难以实施”;如果既不重复也不困难,则将标准指定为“高潜力”。然后对每个参与医院进行有针对性的汇报访谈。
15 家参与医院评估了 108 项标准的可行性,发现 28 项(26%)是重复的,35 项(32%)太难,45 项(42%)有很高的潜力。在 108 项标准中,有 49 项(45%)被选入下一轮标准,59 项被删除。在被删除的标准中,大多数(64%)被评为重复和/或难以实施。
多机构调查和访谈成功地确定了在医院层面上冗余或难以实施的护理标准。这些数据将有助于提高计划的可推广性和可扩展性,同时保持改善护理的总体目标。美国老年医学会 67:1074-1078, 2019.